Individual differences in impulsivity predict head motion during magnetic resonance imaging

PLoS One. 2014 Aug 22;9(8):e104989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104989. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides valuable data for understanding the human mind and brain disorders, but in-scanner head motion introduces systematic and spurious biases. For example, differences in MRI measures (e.g., network strength, white matter integrity) between patient and control groups may be due to the differences in their head motion. To determine whether head motion is an important variable in itself, or just simply a confounding variable, we explored individual differences in psychological traits that may predispose some people to move more than others during an MRI scan. In the first two studies, we demonstrated in both children (N = 245) and adults (N = 581) that head motion, estimated from resting-state functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging, was reliably correlated with impulsivity scores. Further, the difference in head motion between children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and typically developing children was largely due to differences in impulsivity. Finally, in the third study, we confirmed the observation that the regression approach, which aims to deal with motion issues by regressing out motion in the group analysis, would underestimate the effect of interest. Taken together, the present findings provide empirical evidence that links in-scanner head motion to psychological traits.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / diagnosis
  • Brain / pathology
  • Brain / physiology
  • Brain Mapping / methods
  • Brain Mapping / standards
  • Female
  • Head Movements*
  • Humans
  • Impulsive Behavior*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging* / standards
  • Male
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31230031, 91132703, 31221003 and 30800295) and the National Basic Research Program of China (2010CB833903). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.