Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
JPN
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
JPN

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow JPN on Twitter
Research Paper

Decreased uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in male and female patients with PTSD: a diffusion tensor imaging study

Saskia B.J. Koch, Mirjam van Zuiden, Laura Nawijn, Jessie L. Frijling, Dick J. Veltman and Miranda Olff
J Psychiatry Neurosci September 01, 2017 42 (5) 331-342; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.160129
Saskia B.J. Koch
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Mirjam van Zuiden
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Nawijn
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jessie L. Frijling
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dick J. Veltman
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miranda Olff
From the Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, van Zuiden, Nawijn, Frijling, Olff); the Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Koch, Nawijn, Frijling); the Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Veltman); the Arq Psychotrauma Expert Center, Diemen, the Netherlands (Olff); and the Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Koch)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Trajectories of the uncinate fasciculus (Unc. Fas), cingulum and superior longitudinal fasciculus (temporal [SLFT] and parietal [SLFP] projections) of a representative participant.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Right uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and trauma-exposed controls. Average (A) fractional anisotropy and (B) mean diffusivity for male and female patients with PTSD and trauma-exposed controls. Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean. *p < 0.05.

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Correlations between mean diffusivity (MD) of the right uncinate fasciculus and symptom severity in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Correlations between MD of the right uncinate fasciculus and anxiety (Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale [HADS] anxiety subscale) and depression symptoms (HADS depression subscale).

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Correlations between mean diffusivity (MD) of the right uncinate fasciculus and right amygdala reactivity in response to (A) fearful–angry faces and (B) happy–neutral faces compared with the control condition. Contrast estimates in arbitrary units (a.u.) were extracted from a 5 mm sphere surrounding the peak activation effect in the right amygdala (x, y, z = 24, −10, −14). Correlations between MD of the right uncinate fasciculus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) reactivity in response to (C) fearful–angry faces and (D) happy–neutral faces compared with the control condition. Contrast estimates in arbitrary units were extracted from a 10 mm sphere surrounding the peak activation effect in the vmPFC (x, y, z = 6, 48, −2).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants

    CharacteristicGroup; mean ± SD or no. (%)Group differences
    PTSD (n = 38)Trauma-exposed controls (n = 39)MenWomen
    Men (n = 21)Women (n = 27)Men (n = 20)Women (n = 19)Statisticp valueStatisticp value
    Age, yr42.29 ± 9.8338.84 ± 9.7041.35 ± 10.6238.06 ± 9.69t39 = −0.2930.36t34 = 0.2420.81
    Length of police service, yr16.29 ± 10.8214.19 ± 10.4718.42 ± 10.0519.05 ± 9.90t39 = 0.9260.36t34 = 1.6920.10
    Educational levelχ2 = 0.9280.12χ2 = 0.1220.73
     Low0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
     Middle14 (67)14 (88)16 (80)16 (84)
     High7 (33)2 (12)4 (20)3 (16)
    Symptom severity
     CAPS total score68.05 ± 15.6267.35 ± 11.494.70 ± 4.794.68 ± 4.67t39 = −17.36< 0.001t34 = −21.87< 0.001
     CAPS re-experiencing20.95 ± 6.4521.00 ± 5.300.70 ± 1.171.10 ± 1.97U < 0.001< 0.001U < 0.001< 0.001
     CAPS avoidance21.57 ± 7.9722.65 ± 5.651.20 ± 2.350.68 ± 1.83U < 0.001< 0.001U < 0.001< 0.001
     CAPS hyperarousal25.71 ± 5.7923.59 ± 4.372.80 ± 3.683.00 ± 3.07U < 0.001< 0.001U < 0.001< 0.001
     IES-R total score44.57 ± 14.5139.82 ± 23.431.10 ± 1.851.72 ± 3.41U < 0.001< 0.001U = 4.000< 0.001
     Current comorbidity
      MDD4 (19)4 (24)0 (0)0 (0)————
      Dysthymia2 (10)1 (6)0 (0)0 (0)————
      Panic disorder1 (5)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)————
      Specific phobia1 (5)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)————
     HADS anxiety11.52 ± 0.7112.47 ± 1.201.60 ± 0.393.02 ± 0.42t39 = −12.19< 0.001t34 = −7.41< 0.001
     HADS depression10.40 ± 1.0110.01 ± 1.230.95 ± 0.350.47 ± 0.18t39 = −9.91< 0.001t34 = −12.95< 0.001
    Trauma history and alcohol use
     PLES
      No. of work-related traumatic experiences22.50 ± 5.9513.47 ± 9.1720.45 ± 6.4219.74 ± 7.31t38 = −1.0470.30t34 = 2.2790.029
      No. of violent incidents9.65 ± 3.455.06 ± 4.468.30 ± 3.576.74 ± 3.63t38 = −1.2150.23t34 = 1.2420.22
      No. of confrontations with tragic incidents12.85 ± 3.388.41 ± 5.3212.15 ± 3.3313.00 ± 4.18t38 = −0.6600.51t34 = 2.8950.007
    ETI no. of different childhood traumatic experiences6.09 ± 4.555.12 ± 5.053.65 ± 2.354.42 ± 4.89t39 = −2.180.037t34 = −0.4570.65
    AUDIT total score3.52 ± 3.404.06 ± 4.643.40 ± 1.673.10 ± 1.79U = 1940.67U = 153.500.79
    • AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test; CAPS = Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; ETI = Early Trauma Inventory; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IES-R = Impact of Events Scale – Revised; MDD = major depressive disorder; PLES = Police Life Event Scale; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; SD = standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Results of the repeated-measures ANOVAs on FA and MD values of each tract

    TractFAMD
    Fp value*Fp value*
    Uncinate fasciculus
     Main effect of groupF1,66 = 0.1300.72F1,67 = 3.0370.09
     Group × sex interactionF1,66 = 1.2090.28F1,67 = 0.000> 0.99
     Hemisphere × group interactionF1,66 = 1.5130.22F1,67 = 7.5750.008
     Hemisphere × group × sex interaction†F1,66 = 0.7890.38F1,67 = 0.2970.59
    Cingulum bundle
     Main effect of groupF1,68 = 0.5210.47F1,67 = 0.2690.61
     Group × sex interactionF1,68 = 0.7790.38F1,67 = 0.8780.35
     Hemisphere × group interactionF1,68 = 2.4790.12F1,67 = 0.8590.36
     Hemisphere × group × sex interactionF1,69 = 0.3270.57F1,67 = 2.8020.10
    Superior longitudinal fasciculus, parietal projections
     Main effect of groupF1,68 = 2.7570.10F1,69 = 0.3280.57
     Group × sex interactionF1,68 = 0.0900.77F1,69 = 0.0370.85
     Hemisphere × group interactionF1,68 = 0.6200.43F1,69 = 0.5980.44
     Hemisphere × group × sex interactionF1,68 = 0.0170.90F1,69 = 0.2120.65
    Superior longitudinal fasciculus, temporal projections
     Main effect of groupF1,69 = 2.6680.11F1,69 = 1.1330.29
     Group × sex interactionF1,69 = 0.1650.69F1,69 = 0.3350.57
     Hemisphere × group interactionF1,69 = 0.0960.76F1,69 = 0.7420.39
     Hemisphere × group × sex interactionF1,69 = 0.9480.33F1,69 = 0.000> 0.99
    • ANOVA = analysis of variance; FA = fractional anisotropy; MD = mean diffusivity.

    • ↵* Results were considered significant for main and interaction effects at p < 0.017.

    • ↵† One-way ANOVA for each hemisphere with group (PTSD – control) and sex (male – female) as between-subject factors (left hemisphere: main effect of group F1,65 = 0.359, p = 0.55; right hemisphere: main effect of group F1,68 = 6.700, p = 0.012; direction: PTSD > controls. For the post hoc test of the group × hemisphere interaction effect, results were considered significant at p < 0.025.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience: 42 (5)
J Psychiatry Neurosci
Vol. 42, Issue 5
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JPN.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Decreased uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in male and female patients with PTSD: a diffusion tensor imaging study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JPN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JPN web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Decreased uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in male and female patients with PTSD: a diffusion tensor imaging study
Saskia B.J. Koch, Mirjam van Zuiden, Laura Nawijn, Jessie L. Frijling, Dick J. Veltman, Miranda Olff
J Psychiatry Neurosci Sep 2017, 42 (5) 331-342; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160129

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Decreased uncinate fasciculus tract integrity in male and female patients with PTSD: a diffusion tensor imaging study
Saskia B.J. Koch, Mirjam van Zuiden, Laura Nawijn, Jessie L. Frijling, Dick J. Veltman, Miranda Olff
J Psychiatry Neurosci Sep 2017, 42 (5) 331-342; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160129
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Altered White Matter Microstructural Organization in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder across 3,049 Adults: Results from the PGC-ENIGMA PTSD Consortium
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1180-4882.

All editorial matter in JPN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.
To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].
View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire