Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
JPN
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
JPN

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow JPN on Twitter
Research Paper

High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans

Po-Yi Tsai, Wang-Sheng Lin, Kun-Ting Tsai, Chia-Yu Kuo and Pei-Hsin Lin
J Psychiatry Neurosci July 01, 2020 45 (4) 262-270; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.190060
Po-Yi Tsai
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, Tsai, Kuo); the National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, W. Lin); the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuan-Shan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan (W. Lin, P. Lin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wang-Sheng Lin
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, Tsai, Kuo); the National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, W. Lin); the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuan-Shan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan (W. Lin, P. Lin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kun-Ting Tsai
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, Tsai, Kuo); the National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, W. Lin); the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuan-Shan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan (W. Lin, P. Lin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chia-Yu Kuo
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, Tsai, Kuo); the National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, W. Lin); the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuan-Shan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan (W. Lin, P. Lin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pei-Hsin Lin
From the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, Tsai, Kuo); the National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (Tsai, W. Lin); the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Yuan-Shan Branch, Yilan, Taiwan (W. Lin, P. Lin)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Mean group values with standard deviations for Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) scores and subtest scores. Statistical analysis through linear regression with age, time since stroke onset, language and education level as explanatory factors. Significant differences between groups were set at p < 0.05. iTBS = intermittent theta burst stimulation; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with hypertension (HTN+) yielded lower attention improvement (p = 0.008) than patients with no history of hypertension (HTN−). Statistical analysis through linear regression with age, time since stroke onset, language and education level as explanatory factors. Significant differences between groups were set at p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic and clinical characteristics*

    CharacteristiciTBS (n = 15)5 Hz rTMS (n = 11)Sham (n = 15)p value
    Age, yr60.13 ± 14.157.45 ± 12.356.23 ± 120.77
    M/F, n11/49/213/20.65
    Education, yr11.27 ± 5.414 ± 2.813.64 ± 1.90.56
    Poststroke duration, mo18.47 ± 20.2133.27 ± 26.438 ± 7.90.016†
    Ischemic stroke/hemorrhagic stroke, n7/83/810/50.14
    Lesion site (cortex + subcortical, or subcortical), n11/410/112/30.31
    Anomic aphasia, n5< 5< 50.86
    Comorbidities, n
     Hypertension9< 5100.29
     Diabetes mellitus5< 5< 50.23
     Dyslipidemia< 50< 50.43
    RBANS scores
     Total73.7 ± 12.269.1 ± 10.965.3 ± 16.10.19
     Immediate memory73.1 ± 16.669.2 ± 20.061.3 ± 20.00.25
     Visuospatial ability98.9 ± 13.487.0 ± 13.982.9 ± 15.60.17
     Language70.1 ± 14.076.3 ± 4.863.3 ± 18.10.25
     Attention77.5 ± 19.170.1 ± 18.976.1 ± 20.80.52
     Delayed memory79.5 ± 18.875.1 ± 21.176.1 ± 20.80.86
    Beck Depression Inventory score14.5 ± 10.013.0 ± 13.29.2 ± 8.20.27
    • F = female; iTBS = intermittent theta burst stimulation; M = male; RBANS = Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    • ↵* Data are mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise specified. Populations of fewer than 5 people have been rounded to protect participant privacy.

    • ↵† One-way analysis of variance for continuous data and a χ2 test, with significance levels set at p < 0.05. Post hoc analyses revealed significantly longer disease duration in the 5 Hz rTMS group at baseline (p = 0.016), which we used as an explanatory variable for intergroup comparison. Bonferroni correction: iTBS v. 5 Hz rTMS, Z = −3.776, p = 0.001.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Mean RBANS and Beck Depression Inventory scores by group*

    GroupPre-rTMSPost-rTMSDifference|Z|p valuePower
    iTBS
     RBANS scores
      Total73.7 ± 12.280.1 ± 16.06.4 ± 6.23.3270.0010.95
      Immediate memory73.1 ± 16.581.1 ± 20.98 ± 9.62.7370.006
      Visuospatial ability98.9 ± 13.4100.2 ± 14.21.3 ± 3.21.4610.14
      Language70.1 ± 14.076.1 ± 15.66 ± 8.72.8070.0050.68
      Attention77.5 ± 19.180.1 ± 17.12.7 ± 7.81.2890.20
      Delayed memory79.5 ± 18.884.6 ± 19.85.1 ± 9.02.670.0080.51
     Beck Depression Inventory score14.5 ± 10.014.1 ± 9.5−0.4 ± 0.81.7320.08
    5 Hz rTMS
     RBANS scores
      Total69.1 ± 10.976.9 ± 10.67.8 ± 52.9380.0030.99
      Immediate memory69.2 ± 20.075.4 ± 21.56.2 ± 11.71.6020.11
      Visuospatial ability87.0 ± 13.991.0 ± 16.84 ± 12.60.8890.37
      Language76.3 ± 4.877.7 ± 7.31.5 ± 8.80.9540.34
      Attention70.1 ± 19.084.6 ± 15.114.5 ± 15.12.8050.0050.41
      Delayed memory75.1 ± 21.190.6 ± 16.015.5 ± 132.7130.0070.93
     Beck Depression Inventory score13.0 ± 13.28.3 ± 6.5−4.7 ± 11.40.9490.34
    Sham
     RBANS scores
      Total65.3 ± 16.165.9 ± 16.10.6 ± 4.70.0001.000
      Immediate memory61.3 ± 20.064.1 ± 23.72.7 ± 7.91.2630.21
      Visuospatial ability82.9 ± 15.680.1 ± 12.2−2.8 ± 10.90.7560.45
      Language63.3 ± 18.162.7 ± 17.5−0.6 ± 5.70.1190.91
      Attention76.1 ± 20.874.5 ± 22.6−1.6 ± 7.30.770.44
      Delayed memory76.1 ± 20.867.4 ± 23.1−8.7 ± 15.41.9230.054
     Beck Depression Inventory score9.2 ± 8.27.8 ± 7.6−1.1 ± 2.21.8020.07
    • iTBS = intermittent theta burst stimulation; RBANS = Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; rTMS = repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    • ↵* Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed rank test for intragroup comparison; improvement compared with baseline. Significance levels set at p < 0.05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience: 45 (4)
J Psychiatry Neurosci
Vol. 45, Issue 4
1 Jul 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JPN.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JPN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JPN web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans
Po-Yi Tsai, Wang-Sheng Lin, Kun-Ting Tsai, Chia-Yu Kuo, Pei-Hsin Lin
J Psychiatry Neurosci Jul 2020, 45 (4) 262-270; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.190060

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
High-frequency versus theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of poststroke cognitive impairment in humans
Po-Yi Tsai, Wang-Sheng Lin, Kun-Ting Tsai, Chia-Yu Kuo, Pei-Hsin Lin
J Psychiatry Neurosci Jul 2020, 45 (4) 262-270; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.190060
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1180-4882.

All editorial matter in JPN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.
To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].
View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire