Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
JPN
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
JPN

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow JPN on Twitter
Research Paper
Open Access

Frontal asymmetry as a core feature of major depression: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

Hsiang-Jung Tseng, Chia-Feng Lu, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chih-Ming Cheng, Jui-Wen Chu, Mu-Hong Chen, Ya-Mei Bai, Shih-Jen Tsai, Tung-Ping Su and Cheng-Ta Li
J Psychiatry Neurosci May 04, 2022 47 (3) E186-E193; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210131
Hsiang-Jung Tseng
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chia-Feng Lu
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jia-Shyun Jeng
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chih-Ming Cheng
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jui-Wen Chu
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mu-Hong Chen
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya-Mei Bai
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shih-Jen Tsai
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tung-Ping Su
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheng-Ta Li
From the Department of Psychiatry (Tseng, Jeng, Cheng, Chu, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences (Lu), National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Division of Psychiatry (Cheng, Chen, Bai, Tsai, Su, Li), School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; the Department of Psychiatry (Su), Cheng Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Frontal asymmetry plays a major role in depression. However, patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have widespread hypofrontality. We investigated whether patients with TRD have a characteristic frontal activation pattern in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) findings and how the frontal cortex responds to different levels of cognitive tasks.

Methods: We enrolled 27 right-handed patients with TRD, 27 patients without TRD and 27 healthy controls. We used multichannel fNIRS to evaluate activation of the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) and left motor area in response to 3 tasks: finger tapping, a low cognitive–load motor task; verbal fluency, a moderate cognitive–load task; and a dual task involving simultaneous finger tapping and verbal fluency, a high cognitive–load task.

Results: We found significant between-group differences in left DLPFC activation for all 3 tasks. The healthy controls had cortical activation in the left motor area during finger tapping and the bilateral frontal cortex during the dual task. However, patients without TRD had right VLPFC activation during finger tapping and left DLPFC activation during the dual task. Patients with TRD had bilateral DLPFC activation during finger tapping but exhibited increased bilateral VLPFC and left motor area activation during verbal fluency and increased left motor area activation during the dual task. In healthy controls and patients without TRD, we found that the right VLPFC was positively correlated with depression severity.

Limitations: Our cohort included only patients with late-onset depression.

Conclusion: We found different patterns of abnormal frontal activation between patients with and without TRD. In patients without TRD, the right prefrontal cortex (PFC) was recruited during simple motor tasks. However, in patients with TRD, the bilateral PFC was recruited during simple tasks and motor cortical resources were used compensatorily during PFC-demanding complex cognitive tasks.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder is the second-leading cause of disability. 1 It has a lifetime prevalence rate of 11.3 %.2 Among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), those with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are the most severely disabled:3 50 %–60 % of all patients with depression have TRD.4

Patients with depression have prefrontal cortex (PFC) hypometabolism. 5–7 A 1993 study using MRI to examine 48 patients with severe depression reported that the mean total frontal lobe volume was 7% smaller in inpatients with severe depression than in healthy control participants.5 Using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a 2010 study involving 19 patients with a recent diagnosis of major depression reported reduced connectivity of the left frontal pole in a network associated with attention and working memory.6 In addition, a 2017 study that used positron emission tomography (PET) to examine 17 patients with MDD reported that decreased cortical blood flow and standardized uptake value in the prefrontal lobe were closely correlated with depression severity.7

The aforementioned studies have often used fMRI or PET to evaluate PFC function. However, these techniques have high costs and low portability. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been used instead to measure metabolism in different brain areas,8–11 especially during cognitive performance. 12–16 The reliability of event-related fNIRS has been proven.17 Several studies have attempted to differentiate patients with MDD from healthy people by using fNIRS,18 especially during verbal fluency tasks.19–23 Patients with depression have been reported to have attenuated cerebral hemodynamic changes compared with healthy people, and a higher degree of attenuation was associated with more severe depression.24 However, we are unaware of any studies that have used fNIRS with verbal fluency tasks to further differentiate patients with TRD from patients with MDD without TRD.

We hypothesized that patients with TRD would have a characteristic pattern of fNIRS during a verbal fluency task. We compared 3 groups of participants: patients with TRD, patients without TRD and healthy controls. We used fNIRS to evaluate the slope over time of blood hemoglobin difference (Hbdiff) (oxygenated hemoglobin [HbO] minus deoxygenated hemoglobin [HbR]) while the participants engaged in different cognitive tasks, including finger tapping, verbal fluency and dual finger tapping and verbal fluency tasks. We applied fNIRS to the bilateral dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and left motor area, which are related to cognitive deficits in finger tapping and verbal fluency tasks.25,26

Methods

Study participants

We enrolled 81 participants, including 27 healthy controls, 27 patients without TRD and 27 patients with TRD. Psychiatric diagnosis was confirmed through the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria and Thase and Rush staging of treatment resistance (stage ≥ 2). All participants were drug naive or drug free for at least 1 week. Healthy controls did not have major medical or neurologic illnesses, a history of alcohol or substance abuse, or a diagnosis of psychiatric disorder, as determined using the MINI. Exclusion criteria for the initial enrollment included not being a native Chinese speaker and being unfamiliar with Mandarin phonetic symbols. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before all assessments.

Clinical psychiatric and symptomatic evaluations

We completed detailed psychiatric and medical histories and a diagnostic interview using the MINI for all participants. Handedness among the participants was confirmed using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.27 All participants were right-handed. We evaluated depression symptoms using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17).28 We also conducted a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) to evaluate the cognitive function of these patients. After clinical evaluations, all participants performed the finger tapping, verbal fluency and dual task assessments and then underwent fNIRS (mentioned subsequently). Cap positioning for fNIRS was by matching the Cz point (head landmark) using the International 10–20 system criteria.

For the finger tapping assessment, participants were verbally instructed to perform a self-paced unilateral finger tapping (finger-to-thumb opposition movement, from the first to fourth finger then backward) using their dominant hand until instructed to rest (about 20 s).

For the verbal fluency assessment, participants were asked to generate a maximal number of words starting with a Chinese phonetic symbol (e.g., /b(ㄅ)/, /p(ㄆ)/, /m(ㄇ)/, /f(ㄈ)/, /d(ㄉ)/, /t(ㄊ)/) within 20 seconds. Word generation and counting were recorded during the task. To ensure sufficient compliance, each participant had adequate practice trials before the assessment.

For the dual task assessment, participants were instructed to perform finger tapping and verbal fluency simultaneously within a task session. They were asked to generate as many words as possible while tapping their finger for about 20 seconds; the task ended with a resting instruction.

Measuring cerebral activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

To estimate the signal-to-noise quality of a data channel, we calculated the relative coefficient of variation (CV, %) for the raw signals at 760 and 850 nm, which is a routine procedure for fNIRS measurement.29 We implemented data rejection based on 2 types of CV (CVchan and CVtrial) to reduce physical artifacts, such as motion-induced instabilities and blood pressure–induced hemodynamics.30

Embedded Image

where μ is the mean and σ is the standard deviation of the signal. We calculated CVchan over the duration of the assessment (about 18 min) for each channel, and we rejected measurement channels with a value of CVchan greater than 15%. We then obtained CVtrial for 20-second intervals of the individual trial block, and only trials for each remaining channel (CVchan < 15%) with a value of CVtrial less than 10% in both wavelengths were used for subsequent analyses.

The remaining fNIRS signals were bandpass filtered (only frequencies between 0.01 and 0.05 Hz were used) to eliminate the effects of heartbeat, respiration and low-frequency signal drifts for each wavelength.30 We performed wavelet filtering to correct for the motion artifacts in each channel. In this filtering process, the measured signal is typically assumed to be a linear combination of the physiologic signal of interest (hemodynamics) and motion artifacts. Because hemodynamic responses are considerably slower than motion artifacts (such as a spike artifact), the wavelet coefficients for the evoked responses are anticipated to be a Gaussian probability distribution with zero mean and low variance; however, the outliers are assumed to account for the motion artifacts. The outlying coefficients (those exceeding a predefined threshold) can be eliminated before signal reconstruction by using the inverse discrete wavelet transform to eliminate the corresponding motion artifacts. In this study, we set the removal threshold for the wavelet coefficient (α) to 0.1.31

We converted the preprocessed signals to HbO and HbR concentrations by using the modified Beer–Lambert law for each source–detector channel.32 Next, we employed correlation-based signal improvement to improve the signal quality on the basis of findings that brain activation involves HbO increases and HbR decreases in the activated cortical regions.33 We calculated the relative changes in HbO and HbR concentrations at each time point on the basis of a 5-second baseline (about 31 frames) and collected before proceeding with each task and then averaged over 3 repetitions for each condition. We then calculated Hbdiff (HbO – HbR) to determine the increase in total hemoglobin over the initial 5-second time period after the start of the tasks (right after the task instruction and the timer started). Neuronal activation typically induces an increase in the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen with a larger compensatory increment of local cerebral blood flow based on neurovascular coupling.34 Cortical activation–related hemodynamic responses typically involve a rapid elevation of ΔHbO and a lower-amplitude reduction in ΔHbR, as confirmed by simultaneous applications of other neuroimaging techniques.35 We used the slope (Δ(HbO − HbR)/Δt) of the curve during the initial 5 seconds to represent the regional neuronal activation.

The bilateral DLPFC, ventrolateral PFC (VLPFC), and left motor and premotor areas were our primary regions of interest. The DLPFC is associated with executive function, VLPFC is a classic language area, and left motor and premotor areas are responsible for right-hand finger tapping. We executed fNIRS signal preprocessing — including bandpass filtering; motion artifact correction; and HbO, HbR and Hbdiff calculation — by using the HOMER2 package.36 Homemade scripts developed on MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) were used to calculate signal CVs and perform quantitative analyses.

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS 26.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) for all statistical analyses. Only participants with 84.9 % qualified channels were included, and the missing rate was only 4 %. We used independent t tests and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the continuous variables (e.g., age, symptom ratings, word counts for verbal fluency and dual task, and Δ[Hb]) between 2 and 3 groups, respectively. We applied the χ2 test to compare categorical variables between the groups. We set statistical significance at p < 0.05 and conducted least significant difference (LSD) tests for post hoc comparisons. Before executing the independent t tests and ANOVA, we used the Levene test for homogeneity of variances to confirm our homogeneity assumption. When the results obtained from the Levene test were significant (p < 0.05), we used independent t tests with equal variances not assumed for correction; we also applied the Kruskal–Wallis test (nonparametric analysis) for between-group comparisons. Statistical significance was also set at p < 0.05. After confirming the statistical significance between groups, we used an analysis of covariance to exclude possible confounding factors such as age, sex and HDRS-17 scores. Finally, we performed a Pearson correlation analysis to test the association between Hb values and cognitive tasks (i.e., finger tapping, verbal fluency and dual task) and between Hb and HDRS-17 scores (which reflected the severity of depression, applied to all participants).

Results

Clinical characteristics, symptom ratings and cognitive ratings among groups

We found no significant intergroup difference in terms of demographic variables such as age and sex. In addition, the duration of illness did not differ significantly between patients with and without TRD. Depressive symptoms measured using HDRS-17 differed significantly between the groups, which shows that patients with TRD had the most severe depression (mean HDRS-17 score for healthy controls 1.3, 95 % CI 0.7–2.0; for patients without TRD 7.0, 95 % CI 4.8–9.3; and for patients with TRD 21.1, 95 % CI 17.4–24.9). Furthermore, the 3 groups differed significantly in finger tapping but not in verbal fluency or the dual task (slower finger-tapping movement in patients with TRD than for healthy controls; however, the difference became smaller when performing the dual task). Our post hoc analysis showed that healthy controls performed finger tapping better than patients with TRD. However, results from the WCST showed a significant difference between the groups for WCST scores for categories completed but not in percent errors or percent conceptual-level responses (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Demographic, clinical and neurocognitive characteristics of study participants*

Regarding the fNIRS findings, we found significant between-group differences in the left anterior DLPFC (channel 5) for finger tapping, left posterior DLPFC (channel 11) for verbal fluency and left motor areas (channel 12) for the dual task. Post hoc analysis showed that patients without TRD exhibited attenuated oxygenation responses in the left anterior DLPFC (channel 5) for finger tapping compared with the other 2 groups. Patients without TRD also exhibited greater oxygenation responses for the left posterior DLPFC (channel 11) for verbal fluency than those in the other 2 groups. Patients with TRD exhibited lower oxygenation responses in the left motor areas (channel 12) for the dual task than healthy controls and patients without TRD (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Areas of the brain with corresponding functional near-infrared spectroscopy channels. PFC = prefrontal cortex.

We found a positive correlation between finger tapping and fNIRS findings in the left motor area (channel 17) in healthy controls; we also found a positive correlation between the dual task and fNIRS findings in channels involving the right VLPFC and left DLPFC (channels 3, 11 and 14). In patients without TRD, we observed a positive correlation between finger tapping and the right VLPFC (channel 3) and between the dual task and the left DLPFC (channel 9). In patients with TRD, we detected a positive correlation between finger tapping and both the left DLPFC (channel 5) and the right DLPFC (channel 13); however, we noted a negative correlation between verbal fluency and the left VLPFC (channel 2), left VLPFC (channel 10), right VLPFC (channel 14) and left motor area (channel 17), and a negative correlation between the dual task and the left motor area (channel 17) (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Correlation between task performance and functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Our Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between HDRS-17 and Hbdiff slope for finger tapping in healthy controls and patients without TRD. We found that a higher HDRS-17 score was associated with greater recruitment of the right VLPFC. However, no such correlation was noted in patients with TRD (Table 3 and Figure 2).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Differential pattern of fNIRS during assessments of finger tapping, verbal fluency and the dual task (finger tapping and verbal fluency) between groups. At the left anterior DLPFC (channel 5) during finger tapping, patients without TRD show attenuated oxygenation response compared with the other 2 groups. At the left posterior DLPFC (channel 11) during verbal fluency, the oxygenation response in patients without TRD was greater than in the other 2 groups. At the left motor areas (channel 12) during DT, patients with TRD showed decreased oxygenation compared with both healthy controls and those without TRD. The asterisk indicates significant post hoc differences. DLPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; fNIRS = functional near-infrared spectroscopy; TRD = treatment-resistant depression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Correlation between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17 items) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy findings during assessment of finger tapping

Discussion

We found significant differences in Hbdiff fNIRS activation in the left DLPFC between healthy controls, patients without TRD and patients with TRD. Our findings show that patients without TRD exhibited attenuated oxygenation responses in the left anterior DLPFC (channel 5) compared with those in the other 2 groups; however, in the left posterior DLPFC (channel 11) for verbal fluency, patients without TRD exhibited greater oxygen responses than those in the other 2 groups. In the left motor areas (channel 12) for dual task, patients with TRD exhibited lower oxygen responses than healthy controls and patients without TRD.

By using correlation tests between task performance and fNIRS findings, we observed different patterns of abnormal frontal activation between HCs and patients with and without TRD. The patients without TRD used the right PFC when engaging in simple motor tasks, whereas those with TRD used both PFCs; when engaging in PFC-demanding complex cognitive tasks, patients with TRD compensatorily used motor cortical resources.

In contrast to the findings for healthy controls, our results showed significant correlations between finger tapping and the right VLPFC (channel 3) in patients without TRD (Table 2), which suggests an early and overinvolvement of the PFC in handling simple motor tasks. We examined brain activation during tasks ranging from simple to complex and observed that in healthy controls, simple tasks such as finger tapping activated the left motor area (which is reasonable because this area is associated with the movement of the right finger), and complex tasks such as the dual task activated both the left DLPFC and the right inferior frontal cortex (IFC). In patients without TRD, the right PFC was already activated during finger tapping. We excluded false discovery because even if we removed the data that were only marginally less than the 0.05 threshold, these conclusions would hold true.

We determined that in healthy controls, HDRS-17 scores were positively correlated with increased right VLPFC activation during finger tapping (Table 3). This finding supports early involvement of the right PFC in depression.

Using fMRI, a 2018 study involving 22 patients with depression and 15 healthy controls in China reported that depression was related to a dominant right hemisphere.37 A 2008 study of prefrontal brain activation during multiple tasks in patients with MDD also applied fMRI and reported that patients with depression exhibited increased right prefrontal activation during the execution of several types of cognitive tasks.38 The finding from a 2020 study involving 282 patients with major depression in China is consistent with the hypothesis that the right inferior frontal gyrus, projected to premotor cortical areas, is involved in depression.39 Electroencephalogram studies have also established frontal α40 and θ41 asymmetry as biomarkers of depression.

We also found that patients with TRD used the bilateral PFC abnormally to cope with simple motor tasks and used motor cortical resources compensatorily when dealing with complex PFC-demanding cognitive tasks. These findings show that patients with TRD had different patterns of brain activation than patients without TRD; therefore, TRD may be caused by abnormal PFC activation sequences. In patients with TRD, expending greater effort to execute complex tasks such as the dual task resulted in more inefficient activation of the motor cortex; this implies that patients with TRD were using an incorrect strategy to solve the complex problem. The early and abnormal involvement of the bilateral PFC in the simple task may be caused by a decline in prefrontal function in patients with TRD.42

A 2007 study in the United States that used fMRI and involved 21 patients with MDD suggested that a key feature underlying the pathophysiology of major depression is the counterproductive engagement of the right PFC and the lack of engagement of the left lateral–ventromedial prefrontal circuitry important for the downregulation of amygdala responses to negative stimuli.43 We noted a similar phenomenon in patients without TRD, in whom the right PFC, rather than the left PFC, was engaged. However, we found that the left PFC was ineffectively engaged in patients with TRD.

With higher depression scores, we also observed that the right VLPFC was recruited more in healthy controls and patients without TRD. Thus, the healthy controls who were depressed had the same pattern of fNIRS as the patients without TRD: recruitment of the right VLPFC during finger tapping and verbal fluency tasks. This finding implies that otherwise healthy people and patients without TRD (but not those with TRD) share the same mechanism of depression and may lie on the same spectrum of depression.

A 2013 study that used patient data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) randomized clinical trial to calculate Individual Burden of Illness Index for Depression reported that patients with cognitive restoration had a lower relapse rate than did those without cognitive restoration.44 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) effectively improves cognitive function in both patients with depression and older adults.45–47 Traditionally, rTMS has been used to target the left DLPFC with high-frequency stimulatory pulses. However, low-frequency inhibitory pulses over the right DLPFC were also reported.48 Our study findings support that right VLPFC inhibitory rTMS might be effective in patients without TRD, and stimulatory rTMS over the left DLPFC or inhibitory rTMS over the left motor area might be beneficial in patients with TRD.

Limitations

Our cohort included only patients with late-onset depression. Whether our results can be extended to younger patients requires further research. fNIRS data are functional data, which means that we could perform fNIRS only when the patient was executing a task. Future studies should compare fNIRS data with resting-state measurements such as fMRI.

Conclusion

We observed a distinct pattern of left DLPFC activation for all 3 tasks (verbal fluency, finger tapping and the dual task) using fNIRS in healthy controls, patients without TRD and patients with TRD. The results also show right-brain activation in patients without TRD during simple motor tasks such as finger tapping and a whole-brain breakdown in patients with TRD when the tasks became difficult. Our findings suggest that inhibitory rTMS of the right VLPFC in patients without TRD might be effective, and stimulatory rTMS over the left DLPFC or inhibitory rTMS over the left motor area in patients with TRD might be beneficial.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Contributors: Cheng-Ta Li conceived and designed the work. Mu-Hong Chen, Chih-Ming Cheng, Jia-Shyun Jeng and Shih-Jen Tsai aquired the data. Jui-Wen Chu, Chia-Feng Lu and Hsiang-Jung Tseng analyzed or interpreted the data. Jui-Wen Chu, Cheng-Ta Li and Hsiang-Jung Tseng wrote the manuscript. Mu-Hong Chen, Chih-Ming Cheng, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chia-Feng Lu and Shih-Jen Tsai critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All of the authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

  • Funding: This study was sponsored by grants from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V108D44-003-MY3-1) and the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST106-2314-B-075-034-MY3; 108-2321-B-075-004-MY2). This work was also supported by the Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University (Taipei, Taiwan) from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education in Taiwan. Neither of the aforementioned organizations had any role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation of results, writing of the report or ultimate decision to submit the paper for publication.

  • Received August 1, 2021.
  • Revision received November 22, 2021.
  • Accepted January 1, 2022.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

References

  1. ↵
    1. Whiteford HA,
    2. Ferrari AJ,
    3. Degenhardt L,
    4. et al
    . Global burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. In: Patel V, Chisholm D, Dua T, et al., editors. Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed. Vol. 4. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2016:29–40.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Lam RW,
    2. McIntosh D,
    3. Wang J,
    4. et al
    . Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 1. Disease burden and principles of care. Can J Psychiatry 2016;61:510–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Greden JF
    . The burden of disease for treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(Suppl 16):26–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fava M
    . Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003;53:649–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Coffey CE,
    2. Wilkinson WE,
    3. Weiner RD,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative cerebral anatomy in depression. A controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:7–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Veer IM,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. van Tol M-J,
    4. et al
    . Whole brain restingstate analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression. Front Syst Neurosci 2010;4:41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fu C,
    2. Shi D,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. et al
    . Functional assessment of prefrontal lobes in patients with major depression disorder using a dual-mode technique of 3D-arterial spin labeling and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Exp Ther Med 2017;14:1058–64.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Hoshi Y,
    2. Tamura M
    . Detection of dynamic changes in cerebral oxygenation coupled to neuronal function during mental work in man. Neurosci Lett 1993;150:5–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Villringer A,
    2. Planck J,
    3. Stodieck S,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive assessment of cerebral hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation during activation of brain cell function in human adults using near infrared spectroscopy. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;345:559–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ferrari M,
    2. Quaresima V
    . A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. Neuroimage 2012;63:921–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Yücel MA,
    2. Selb JJ,
    3. Huppert TJ,
    4. et al
    . Functional near infrared spectroscopy: enabling routine functional brain imaging. Curr Opin Biomed Eng 2017;4:78–86.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Chance B,
    2. Zhuang Z,
    3. UnAh C,
    4. et al
    . Cognition-activated low-frequency modulation of light absorption in human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:3770–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kato T,
    2. Kamei A,
    3. Takashima S,
    4. et al
    . Human visual cortical function during photic stimulation monitoring by means of near-infrared spectroscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;13:516–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Maki A,
    2. Yamashita Y,
    3. Ito Y,
    4. et al
    . Spatial and temporal analysis of human motor activity using noninvasive NIR topography. Med Phys 1995;22:1997–2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Meek JH,
    2. Elwell CE,
    3. Khan MJ,
    4. et al
    . Regional changes in cerebral haemodynamics as a result of a visual stimulus measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Proc Biol Sci 1995;261:351–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Meek JH,
    2. Firbank M,
    3. Elwell CE,
    4. et al
    . Regional hemodynamic responses to visual stimulation in awake infants. Pediatr Res 1998; 43: 840–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Plichta MM,
    2. Herrmann MJ,
    3. Baehne CG,
    4. et al
    . Event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): Are the measurements reliable? Neuroimage 2006;31:116–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Zhu H,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Li J,
    4. et al
    . Decreased functional connectivity and disrupted neural network in the prefrontal cortex of affective disorders: a resting-state fNIRS study. J Affect Disord 2017;221:132–44.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Takizawa R,
    2. Fukuda M,
    3. Kawasaki S,
    4. et al
    . Neuroimaging-aided differential diagnosis of the depressive state. Neuroimage 2014;85:498–507.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Baik SY,
    2. Kim J-Y,
    3. Choi J,
    4. et al
    . Prefrontal asymmetry during cognitive tasks and its relationship with suicide ideation in major depressive disorder: an fNIRS study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019;9:193.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ho CSH,
    2. Lim LJH,
    3. Lim AQ,
    4. et al
    . Diagnostic and predictive applications of functional near-infrared spectroscopy for major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2020;11:378.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Husain SF,
    2. Tang T-B,
    3. Yu R,
    4. et al
    . Cortical haemodynamic response measured by functional near infrared spectroscopy during a verbal fluency task in patients with major depression and borderline personality disorder. EBioMedicine 2020;51:102586.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Husain SF,
    2. Tu R,
    3. Tang T-B,
    4. et al
    . Validating a functional near-infrared spectroscopy diagnostic paradigm for major depressive disorder. Sci Rep 2020;10:9740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Kawano M,
    2. Kanazawa T,
    3. Kikuyama H,
    4. et al
    . Correlation between frontal lobe oxy-hemoglobin and severity of depression assessed using near-infrared spectroscopy. J Affect Disord 2016;205:154–8.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Colebatch JG,
    2. Deiber MP,
    3. Passingham RE,
    4. et al
    . Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. J Neurophysiol 1991;65:1392–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Abiru M,
    2. Sakai H,
    3. Sawada Y,
    4. et al
    . The effect of the challenging two handed rhythm tapping task to DLPFC activation. Asian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2016;12:75–83.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Oldfield RC
    . The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hamilton M
    . A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960;23:56–62.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Schmitz CH,
    2. Klemer DP,
    3. Hardin R,
    4. et al
    . Design and implementation of dynamic near-infrared optical tomographic imaging instrumentation for simultaneous dual-breast measurements. Appl Opt 2005;44:2140–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Piper SK,
    2. Krueger A,
    3. Koch SP,
    4. et al
    . A wearable multi-channel fNIRS system for brain imaging in freely moving subjects. Neuroimage 2014;85:64–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Molavi B,
    2. Dumont GA
    . Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiol Meas 2012;33: 259–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kocsis L,
    2. Herman P,
    3. Eke A
    . The modified Beer–Lambert law revisited. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:N91–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Cui X,
    2. Bray S,
    3. Reiss AL
    . Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signal improvement based on negative correlation between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin dynamics. Neuroimage 2010;49:3039–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ances BM,
    2. Wilson DF,
    3. Greenberg JK,
    4. et al
    . Dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow, O2 tension, and calculated cerebral metabolic rate of O2 during functional activation using oxygen phosphorescence quenching. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:511–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hock C,
    2. Villringer K,
    3. Muller-Spahn F,
    4. et al
    . Decrease in parietal cerebral hemoglobin oxygenation during performance of a verbal fluency task in patients with Alzheimer’s disease monitored by means of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)–correlation with simultaneous rCBF-PET measurements. Brain Res 1997;755:293–303.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Huppert TJ,
    2. Diamond SG,
    3. Franceschini MA,
    4. et al
    . HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain. Appl Opt 2009;48:D280–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Lu S
    . Neural basis of depression related to a dominant right hemisphere: a resting-state fMRI study. Behav Neurol 2018;2018: 5024520.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Fitzgerald PB,
    2. Srithiran A,
    3. Benitez J,
    4. et al
    . An fMRI study of prefrontal brain activation during multiple tasks in patients with major depressive disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:490–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Rolls ET,
    2. Cheng W,
    3. Du J,
    4. et al
    . Functional connectivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex in depression. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2020;15:75–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Gold C,
    2. Fachner J,
    3. Erkkilä J
    . Validity and reliability of electroencephalographic frontal alpha asymmetry and frontal midline theta as biomarkers for depression. Scand J Psychol 2013;54:118–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Dharmadhikari AS,
    2. Tandle AL,
    3. Jaiswal SV,
    4. et al
    . Frontal Theta Asymmetry as a Biomarker of Depression. East Asian Arch Psychiatry 2018;28:17–22.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Li C-T,
    2. Su T-P,
    3. Wang S-J,
    4. et al
    . Prefrontal glucose metabolism in medication-resistant major depression. Br J Psychiatry 2015;206: 316–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Johnstone T,
    2. van Reekum CM,
    3. Urry HL,
    4. et al
    . Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal–subcortical circuitry in major depression. J Neurosci 2007;27:8877–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Ishak WW,
    2. Greenberg JM,
    3. Cohen RM
    . Predicting relapse in major depressive disorder using patient-reported outcomes of depressive symptom severity, functioning, and quality of life in the Individual Burden of Illness Index for Depression (IBI-D). J Affect Disord 2013;151:59–65.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Hayasaka S,
    2. Nakamura M,
    3. Noda Y,
    4. et al
    . Lateralized hippocampal volume increase following high-frequency left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with major depression. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2017;71:747–58.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nilakantan AS,
    2. Mesulam M-M,
    3. Weintraub S,
    4. et al
    . Network-targeted stimulation engages neurobehavioral hallmarks of age-related memory decline. Neurology 2019;92:e2349–54.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Shinba T,
    2. Kariya N,
    3. Matsuda S,
    4. et al
    . Increase of frontal cerebral blood volume during transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression is related to treatment effectiveness: a pilot study with near-infrared spectroscopy. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2018;72:602–10.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Pallanti S,
    2. Di Rollo A,
    3. Antonini S,
    4. et al
    . Low-frequency rTMS over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the treatment of resistant depression: cognitive improvement is independent from clinical response, resting motor threshold is related to clinical response. Neuropsychobiology 2012;65:227–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience: 47 (3)
J Psychiatry Neurosci
Vol. 47, Issue 3
22 Jun 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JPN.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frontal asymmetry as a core feature of major depression: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JPN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JPN web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Frontal asymmetry as a core feature of major depression: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study
Hsiang-Jung Tseng, Chia-Feng Lu, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chih-Ming Cheng, Jui-Wen Chu, Mu-Hong Chen, Ya-Mei Bai, Shih-Jen Tsai, Tung-Ping Su, Cheng-Ta Li
J Psychiatry Neurosci May 2022, 47 (3) E186-E193; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.210131

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Frontal asymmetry as a core feature of major depression: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study
Hsiang-Jung Tseng, Chia-Feng Lu, Jia-Shyun Jeng, Chih-Ming Cheng, Jui-Wen Chu, Mu-Hong Chen, Ya-Mei Bai, Shih-Jen Tsai, Tung-Ping Su, Cheng-Ta Li
J Psychiatry Neurosci May 2022, 47 (3) E186-E193; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.210131
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1180-4882.

All editorial matter in JPN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.
To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].
View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire