PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Luciw, Nicholas J. AU - Grigorian, Anahit AU - Dimick, Mikaela K. AU - Jiang, Guocheng AU - Chen, J. Jean AU - Graham, Simon J. AU - Goldstein, Benjamin I. AU - MacIntosh, Bradley J. TI - Classifying youth with bipolar disorder versus healthy youth using cerebral blood flow patterns AID - 10.1503/jpn.230012 DP - 2023 Aug 29 TA - Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience PG - E305--E314 VI - 48 IP - 4 4099 - http://jpn.ca/content/48/4/E305.short 4100 - http://jpn.ca/content/48/4/E305.full SO - JPN2023 Aug 29; 48 AB - Background: Clinical neuroimaging studies often investigate group differences between patients and controls, yet multivariate imaging features may enable individual-level classification. This study aims to classify youth with bipolar disorder (BD) versus healthy youth using grey matter cerebral blood flow (CBF) data analyzed with logistic regressions.Methods: Using a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, we collected pseudo-continuous, arterial spin-labelling, resting-state functional MRI (rfMRI) and T1-weighted images from youth with BD and healthy controls. We used 3 logistic regression models to classify youth with BD versus controls, controlling for age and sex, using mean grey matter CBF as a single explanatory variable, quantitative CBF features based on principal component analysis (PCA) or relative (intensity-normalized) CBF features based on PCA. We also carried out a comparison analysis using rfMRI data.Results: The study included 46 patients with BD (mean age 17 yr, standard deviation [SD] 1 yr; 25 females) and 49 healthy controls (mean age 16 yr, SD 2 yr; 24 females). Global mean CBF and multivariate quantitative CBF offered similar classification performance that was above chance. The association between CBF images and the feature map was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.13); however, the multivariate classifier identified regions with lower CBF among patients with BD (ΔCBF = −2.94 mL/100 g/min; permutation test p = 0047). Classification performance decreased when considering rfMRI data.Limitations: We cannot comment on which CBF principal component is most relevant to the classification. Participants may have had various mood states, comorbidities, demographics and medication records. Conclusion: Brain CBF features can classify youth with BD versus healthy controls with above-chance accuracy using logistic regression. A global CBF feature may offer similar classification performance to distinct multivariate CBF features.