Technique, study | Sample size* | Within/between | Sex | OXT dose, IU | Task used | Brain areas analyzed | Effects of OXT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
fMRI | |||||||
Baumgartner et al.23 | 49 (23 PBO, 26 OXT) | Between | M | 24 | Trust game | Amygdala, brainstem, caudate, putamen, insula, thalamus | Increased trust in partner after trust had been violated |
Domes et al.24 | 13 | Within | M | 24 | Implicit facial emotion processing by identifying sex of fearful, angry and happy faces | Amygdala, temporal pole, TPJ, thalamus, PFC | Increased ability to identify emotions |
Domes et al.25 | 16 | Within | F | 24 | Explicit facial emotion processing by rating arousal of fearful, angry and happy faces | Amygdala, brainstem, temporal pole, STG, fusiform gyrus, insula, PFC, thalamus | Greater arousal in rating facial emotions |
Gamer et al.26 | 46 (23 PBO, 23 OXT) | Between | M | 24 | Explicit facial emotion processing by classifying emotion of fearful and happy faces | Amygdala, superior colliculus | Increased ability to identify emotions; gaze starts at mouth and is redirected to eyes for longer period |
Kirsch et al.27 | 15 | Within | M | 27 | Implicit facial emotion processing by matching fearful and angry faces | Amygdala, brainstem | Increased ability to identify emotion |
Labuschagne et al.28†‡ | 18 | Within | M | 24 | Implicit facial processing by matching angry, fearful, happy and neutral faces | Amygdala | Insignificant decreases in amygdala activity |
Labuschagne et al.29† | 18 | Within | M | 24 | Explicit facial processing using emotional classification of sad, happy and neutral faces | mPFC, ACC, thalamus, STG | General attenuation in areas associated with processing social stimuli, cognitive control and emotion regulation |
Lischke et al.30 | 14 | Within | F | 2 | Explicit processing by rating emotional arousal of negative, positive and neutral scenes | Amygdala, temporal pole, fusiform gyrus | Increased threat sensitivity in the amygdala to scenes depicting social and nonsocial threat; no changes in eye tracking |
Petrovic et al.31 | 27 (12 PBO, 15 OXT) | Between | M | 32 | Aversely conditioned face processing by rating likeability of faces that were previously paired with a negative experience | Amygdala, ACC, vlPFC, fusiform area | Increased likeability of faces even after being linked to aversive stimuli |
Pincus et al.32 | 9 | Within | 1M/8F | 40 | Explicit emotional processing using Reading of the Mind in the Eyes test by emotional classification | Caudate, amygdala, ACC, STG, GP | OXT increased activity in areas associated with reward and processing of social stimuli |
Riem et al.33§ | 42 (21 PBO, 21 OXT) | Between | F | 24 | Auditory exposure to babies crying | Amygdala, insula | Decrease in amygdala to sound clips of crying babies |
Riem et al.34 | 42 (20 PBO, 22 OXT) | Between | F | 16¶ | Auditory exposure to infant laughter | Connectivity between the amygdala and the OFC, ACC, hippocampus, precuneus, supramarginal gyri and MTG | Increased functional connectivity between the amygdala and other areas involved in regulating emotion and decrease in amygdala when listening to laughter over control noise |
Rilling et al.35 | 60 (34 PBO, 26 OXT) | Between | M | 24 | Altruistic interaction | Amygdala, caudate, ventral PFC, insula, putamen | Differences in activity in reciprocated and unreciprocated cooperativism; increase in amygdala only in reciprocated interaction |
Singer et al.36 | 20 | Between | M | 32 | Empathy for pain and experience of pain | PFC, OFC, amygdala | No significant observations in response to viewing their partner in pain; reduced amygdala activation when receiving painful stimulation |
Sripada et al.37 | 15 | Within | M | 24 | Resting state connectivity | Amygdala to ACC/rmFC | Increased connectivity during resting state |
Striepens et al.38 | 70 (35 PBO, 35 OXT) | Between | M | 24 | Implicit processing of social scenes using a memory task with negative and neutral pictures paired with nouns | Insula, amygdala | Increased memory for negative pictures at the expense of neutral stimuli; accompanied by an increase in the left insula and changes in connectivity between the insula and amygdala |
Wittfoth-Schardt et al.39 | 21 | Within | M | 24 | Implicit facial processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces | GP, MTG, caudate | Reduced activity and functional connectivity to the GP from reward-related regions to pictures of own child and unknown child |
EEG | |||||||
Born et al.40 | 17 | Within | M | 40 | Auditory mismatch paradigm | N2 and P3 | No effect of OXT |
Fehm-Wolfsdorf et al.41 | 30 | Between | M | 20 | Memory recall of 25 nouns, tone counting | Auditory evoked potentials | No effect of OXT on memory or auditory stimuli |
Huffmeijer et al.42 | 47 | Between | F | 15.6 | Altruistic interaction | Frontal asymmetry | Increased donations from OXT corresponded with decrease in left/increase in right frontal activity |
Huffmeijer et al.43 | 48 | Within | F | 16 | Combination of feedback processing and facial processing | VPP and LPP | More positive VPP and LPP after OXT, which was heightened more for those experiencing less love withdrawal |
Perry et al.44 | 24 | Within | M | 24 | Point light experiment to mimic biological and nonbiological motion | μ rhythms | Better able to identify biological movement, which corresponded to μ suppression across the whole scalp |
ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; EEG = electroencephalography; F = female; fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging; GP = globus pallidum; LPP = late positive potential; M = male; mPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; OXT = oxytocin; PBO = placebo; PFC = prefrontal cortex; rmFC = rostromedial frontal cortex; STG = superior temporal gyrus; TPJ = temporoparietal junction; vlPFC = ventrolateral prefrontal cortex; VPP = vertex positive potential; VTA = ventral tegmental area.
↵* Sample size incudes only the participants in the OXT and PBO samples. Other participants may have been included in other arms of the study.
↵† Also included 18 patients with generalized anxiety disorder, but only results from healthy controls are reported.
↵‡ Excluded from analysis other than that of the amygdala because no direction of effects were reported.
↵§ Also included patients with depression, but only results from healthy controls are reported.
↵¶ Originally reported as 20 IU, but a subsequent erratum confirmed it was 16 IU.