Table 1

Sample characteristics and behavioural results

Characteristic*No. participantsRangeMean ± SDPearson R
Age, yr3823 to 4932.53 ± 7.130.27
Age at first drunken stupor, yr3812 to 1815.16 ± 1.590.19
Alcohol Dependence Scale Score3625 to 5432 ± 7.040.83
Alcohol-specific failed self-control (ratio of failed self-control rates between alcohol and nonalcohol trials)370.07 to 3.251.18 ± 0.560.41
AUDIT score382 to 3011.08 ± 7.05
No. drinking d/wk in the last mo380.25 to 62.98 ± 2.040.48
No. of drinks per drinking d in the last mo383 to 128.16 ± 2.950.54
Barratt Impulsiveness Scale score3842 to 17169.43 ± 25.370.13
Beck Depression Inventory score3521 to 11927.94 ± 16.270.11
Edinburgh Handedness Inventory quotient3810 to 10081.75 ± 19.530.05
Interaction effec in response times [(FA − FN) − (SA −SN)]37−848.53 to 876.82−5.7 ± 401.140.37
IQ3470.00 to 115.0096.91 ± 10.870.14
Lifetime Drinking History alcohol intake per mo, g3882 to 94651762 ± 17740.56
Lifetime Drinking History total alcohol intake, g384861 to 2 754 299390 481 ± 524 0300.51
Response time for FA trials, ms38972.57 to 2354.061499.08 ± 287.900.36
Response time for FN trials, ms38934.76 to 2303.951536.92 ± 316.190.19
Response time for SA trials, ms37996.96 to 3063.501811.08 ± 479.95−0.22
Response time for SN trials, ms38994.33 to 3031.501864.11 ± 438.210.20
Monetary Choice Questionnaire — Discounting Index score380.0003 to 690.019 ± 0.0190.20
Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale score352 to 2811.09 ± 6.160.77
Proportion of failed self-control trials in all trials380.11 to 0.980.72 ± 0.220.03
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score3845 to 5248.92 ± 1.810.01
Total abstinence, mo360 to 71.45 ± 1.950.16
Total drinking, yr385 to 3416 ± 70.30
Education, yr3810 to 2216.36 ± 2.79−0.15
  • AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; FA = failed self-control in an alcohol–nonalcohol conflict; FN = failed self-control in a nonalcohol–nonalcohol conflict; SA = successful self-control in an alcohol–non-alcohol conflict; SD = standard deviation; SN = successful self-control in a nonalcohol–nonalcohol conflict.

  • * Eighteen participants were smokers and 20 were not (p = 0.21, 2-sample t test).

  • Significant at a threshold of p < 0.01.

  • Significant at a threshold of p < 0.05.