Table 1

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies involving patients at clinical high risk for psychosis included in the meta-analysis

StudyYearHigh-risk assessmentNo.% femaleAge, yrNo.% femaleAge, yrTeslafMRI methodStatistical thresholdTask
BrĂ¼ne et al. (26)2011SIPS+BSABS2634291030261.5SPM5UncTheory of mind
Fusar-Poli et al. (27)2010CAARMS1546251540241.5SPM5FWEPaired associate learning
Allen et al. (28)2010CAARMS1546261540271.5SPM2CorrSentence completion task
Sabb et al. (29)2010SIPS2450194340183FSLCorrLanguage processing
Pauly et al. (30)2010CAARMS1217241217241.5SPM2Monte CarloN-back
Broome et al. (31)2010CAARMS1530251730241.5XBAMFDRRandom movement generation
Allen et al. (32)2009CAARMS2236281844271.5SPM2FWEFalse memory task
Broome et al. (10)2009CAARMS1530251730241.5XBAMFDRVerbal fluency, n-back
Benetti et al. (33)2009CAARMS1436261638241.5SPM5FWEDelayed match to sample
Seiferth et al. (34)2008SIPS1217251217251.5SPM2FWEEmotional faces
  • BSABS = Bonn Scale for Assessment of Basic Symptoms; (35) CAARMS = Comprehensive Assessment for the At-Risk Mental State; (36) corr = corrected for multiple comparisons; FDR = false discovery rate; fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging; FWE = family-wise error; SIPS = Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms; (37) unc = uncorrected for multiple comparisons.