Table 3

Characteristics of included reconsolidation interference studies — clinical samples

StudyClinical diagnosisPropranolol/placeboMale/ female, %Age, yr, mean ± SDStudy protocolOutcome measures of interestPrimary results of interestQuality
No. randomizedNo. analyzed on test day
Brunet et al.52 (2008)Chronic PTSD9/109/1047/53Propranolol: 34.8 ± 10.1
Placebo: 35.1 ± 10.5
Week 1: script preparation, 40 mg (short-acting) immediately after reactivation and 60 mg (long-acting) after 2 h
Week 2: script-driven imagery
Heart rate SCR to personal script at week 2Propranolol < placebo on heart rate and SCR to personal script4
Brunet et al.56 (2014)Chronic PTSD28/1022/10*32/6837.9 ± 9.5Week 1: 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) followed by 1 mg/kg (long-acting), script preparation 90 min later
Weeks 2–6: 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) and 1 mg/kg (long-acting) 90 min before reactivation
Week 7: script-driven imagery
4 mo follow-up: script-driven imagery
Heart rate and SCR to personal script at 1 wk post-treatmentPropranolol < placebo on heart rate and SCR to personal script at 1 wk post-treatmentN/A
Brunet et al.23 (2018)Chronic PTSD30/3021/2342/58Propranolol: 37.0 ± 11.3
Placebo: 41.8 ± 11.1
Week 1: 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) then 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 60 min before script preparation
Weeks 2–6:
0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) plus 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 90 min before reactivation
Week 7: Post-treatment assessment
PCL-S and CAPS at post-treatmentPropranolol < placebo on PCL-S and CAPS at post-treatment5
Elsey et al.54 (2020)Fear of public speaking40/2040/2017/83Propranolol: 21.65 ± 2.78
Placebo: 22.10 ± 1.92
Week 1: Baseline measures, speech preparation; 40 mg of propranolol administered < 5 min post-speech (reactivation)
Week 2: stress-inducing speech task (0 to 9 min) as reactivation
1 mo follow-up: symptom evaluation 3 mo follow-up: symptom evaluation
GPSP, SUDS and PRPSA at week 2Propranolol = placebo on GPSP, SUDS and PRPSA at week 24
Jobes et al.27 (2015)Cocaine abuse in poly-drug dependence19/1618/1548/52Propranolol: 41.6
Placebo: 42.1
Week 1: personalized cocaine script, tactile drug-related paraphernalia
Week 2: 40 mg 120 min before reactivation Week 3: re-exposure test session
Week 7: re-exposure test session
CCQ and VAS at 1 wk post-interventionPropranolol > placebo on CCQ and VAS at 1 wk post-intervention3.5
Lonergan et al.24 (2016)Substance dependence9/86/471/29Propranolol: 44.78 ± 18.66
Placebo: 35.63 ± 16.09
Week 0: assessment and craving script preparation
Week 1–3: 6 biweekly sessions (separated by 48 h) of 1 mg/kg of propranolol 60 min before craving-memory reactivation
Week 4: post-treatment assessment
Self-report craving questionnaires post-treatmentPropranolol < placebo on self-reported craving at post-treatment (in intention-to-treat analysis)4.5
Pachas et al.28 (2015)Nicotine dependence35/3923/3173/27Propranolol: 41.6 ± 10.9
Placebo: 42.5 ± 9.8
Week 1: screening and evaluation; 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting), 1 mg/kg (long-acting) 90 min later, followed by reactivation (personal script)
Week 2: script-driven imagery
Heart rate, SCR and self-reported craving at week 2Propranolol = placebo on heart rate, SCR and self-reported craving at week 23.5
Roullet et al.58 (2021; severe symptom group, PCL-S score > 65)PTSD18/15Not reportedUnknownUnknownWeek 1: 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) then 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 60 min before script preparation
Weeks 2–6:
0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) plus 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 90 min before reactivation
Week 7: post-treatment assessment
PCL-S 3 mo
post-treatment
Propranolol < placebo on the PCL-S
3 mo post-treatment
5
Roullet et al.58 (2021; moderate symptom group (PCL-S score > 45 < 65)PTSD11/14Not reportedUnknownUnknownWeek 1: 0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) then 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 60 min before script preparation
Weeks 2–6:
0.67 mg/kg (short-acting) plus 1.0 mg/kg (long-acting) 90 min before reactivation
Week 7: post-treatment assessment
PCL-S 3 mo
post-treatment
Propranolol = placebo on the PCL-S
3 mo post-treatment
5
Soeter et al.7 (2015)Spider phobia15/1515/159/9121.6 ± 3.2Day 1: pre-treatment assessments and BAT with baby tarantula
Day 5: 40 mg post-reactivation exposure to tarantula
Day 16: post-treatment assessment Follow-up: 3 mo and 1 yr
BAT to tarantula and SPQ at post-treatment day 16Propranolol showed > approach BAT to tarantula than placebo, but = SPQ scores at day 164
Xue et al.53 (2017)Nicotine dependence96 randomized; 27 excluded
Of 69 included: 24 placebo + reactivation, 23
propranolol + reactivation, 22 non-placebo control
23/24100/0Propranolol: 24.96 ± 5.9
Placebo: 23.00 ± 4.0
Day 1: screening and baseline tests of preference and craving for pre-existing nicotine conditioned stimulus
Days 2–4: conditioning
Day 5: post-conditioning test of preference and craving for the conditioned stimulus
Day 6: 40 mg 60 min before unconditioned stimulus memory reactivation
Day 7: post-treatment test
Subjective ratings of nicotine craving VAS on day 7Propranolol < placebo on subjective ratings of nicotine craving VAS on day 74.5
Zhao et al.26 (2011)Heroin dependence18/1818/18100/0Propranolol: 38.11 ± 1.25
Placebo: 38.00 ± 1.30
Day 1: Learning drug-related words
Day 2: 40 mg 60 min before reactivation
Day 3: long-term memory task
Free recall no. of drug-related words on day 3Propranolol < placebo on free recall of drug-related words on day 33.5
  • BAT = Behavioural Approach Test; CAPS = Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale; CCQ = Cocaine Craving Questionnaire; GPSP = Global Perception of Speech Performance; PCL-S = PTSD Checklist–Specific; PRPSA = Personal Report of Public Speaking Anxiety; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; SCR = skin conductance response; SD = standard deviation; SPQ = Spider Phobia Questionnaire; SUDS = Subjective Units of Distress; VAS = visual analogue scale.

  • * Data from 10 placebo participants from Brunet and colleagues52 (2008) were included in the between-group analysis in Brunet and colleagues56 (2014). These data were included in the meta-analysis; analyses were conducted with and without these data.

  • Full sample demographics: propranolol n = 33 randomized, n = 29 treatment completers, n = 20 women, age (mean ± SD) = 35.6 ± 12.8 yr, n = 26 at 3 mo follow-up; placebo n = 33 randomized, n = 29 treatment completers, n = 21 women, age (mean ± SD) = 42.2 ± 12.7 yr, n = 25 at 3 mo follow-up. Analyses were carried out and presented on the intention-to-treat sample.