Table 5

Regression models of the effects of the rostral cingulate cortex regions of interest on BASC-2 PRS T scores

GroupComposite scalesRostral cingulate cortex regions of interest*
Unexposed controlsExternalizing Problems (n = 47)Right pregenual ACC (β = −0.317, p = 0.030)
Internalizing Problems (n = 47)Right pregenual ACC (β = −0.369, p = 0.011, q = 0.09)
Behavioural Symptoms Index (n = 47)Right pregenual ACC (β = −0.409, p = 0.004, q = 0.06)
Right total rostral cingulate cortex (β = −0.295, p = 0.044)
Adaptive Skills (n = 47)NS
Individuals with prenatal alcohol exposureExternalizing Problems (n = 28)NS
Internalizing Problems (n = 29)Right anterior MCC (β = 0.536, p = 0.003, q = 0.048)
Right total rostral cingulate cortex (β = 0.474, p = 0.009, q = 0.075)
Behavioural Symptoms Index (n = 29)Right anterior MCC (β = 0.429, p = 0.020)
Left anterior MCC (β = 0.385, p = 0.038)
Adaptive Skills (n = 29)Right anterior MCC (β = −0.374, p = 0.046)
Left anterior MCC (β = −0.369, p = 0.049)
  • ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; BASC-2-PRS = Behaviour Assessment System for Children, 2nd edition, Parent Rating Scale; FDR = false discovery rate; MCC = midcingulate cortex; NS = not significant.

  • * Benjamini–Hochberg FDR-corrected p values are shown as q values. For Benjamini–Hochberg FDR correction, we assumed 8 tests for the associations between the BASC-2 PRS and total rostral cingulate cortex volume and 16 tests for the associations between the BASC-2 PRS and subregion volumes.