Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 15, Issue 4, April 2002, Pages 836-846
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Error Rate and Outcome Predictability Affect Neural Activation in Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate during Decision-Making

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1031Get rights and content

Abstract

Decision-making in the presence of uncertainty is a complex process that involves both affective and cognitive factors. Both error rate and predictability have been implicated in the process of response selection during decision-making. This study examined the hypothesis that the rate of errors during decision-making differentially affects the activation in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. BOLD echo-planar signal intensity was obtained during a two-choice prediction task across 90-s blocks with 20, 50, or 80% error rates. This study yielded three main findings. First, at chance level error rates, activation of the right dorsolateral (BA 9, 46), inferior prefrontal (BA 44), and precuneus (BA 7) during the two-choice prediction task replicated the finding previously reported. Second, premotor (BA 6) and parahippocampal (BA 36) areas were relatively more active at high error rates, and dorsolateral (BA 9, 46) and inferior prefrontal cortex (BA 44) as well as parietal (BA 40) and cingulate cortex (BA 25, 32) were more active during low error rates. Third, the relationship between the frequency of the dominant strategy underlying decision-making (win–stay/lose–shift) and the activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate was dependent on error rate or outcome predictability. These results support the hypothesis that error rates and predictability affect the activation patterns in the neural systems underlying decision-making because these structures maintain a representation of the reinforcement history for the available response alternatives to select an “optimal strategy.”

References (38)

  • M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex

    Nature

    (1999)
  • R.C. Calfee et al.

    Two-choice behavior under limiting cases of contingent reinforcement schedules

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1966)
  • C.S. Carter et al.

    The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition

    Rev. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: Who's in control?

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • S.M. Courtney et al.

    Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory

    Nature

    (1997)
  • A.R. Damasio et al.

    Neurobiology of Decision-Making

    (1996)
  • D.M. Egelman et al.

    A computational role for dopamine delivery in human decision-making

    J. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • R. Elliott et al.

    Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (119)

    • Phenotypes of reinforcement sensitivity as predictors of the response to acute antidepressant treatment in rats

      2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The BIS also gives rise to emotional distress and is associated with trait negative affect, especially anxiety (McNaughton and Gray, 2000). An effective way of measuring an individual's sensitivity to reinforcement is to assess win-stay and lose-shift behaviour in a probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) paradigm (Cools et al., 2002; Evers et al., 2005; Paulus et al., 2002, 2003). In this paradigm, two (sometimes more) stimuli are presented on each trial, and subjects, using trial-and-error feedback after each response, learn to select the stimulus that is usually correct (rewarded on a majority (e.g., 80%) or punished/unrewarded on a minority (e.g., 20%) of trials) and to avoid the one that usually is incorrect (punished or unrewarded on a majority (e.g., 80%) and rewarded on a minority (e.g., 20%) of trials).

    • Neural reward response to substance-free activity images in opiate use disorder patients with depressive symptoms

      2019, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      The angular gyrus may be particularly relevant in responsivity to stimuli as it is recognized as an “associative cortex” for a variety of semantic, episodic memory, and emotional stimuli (Kohn et al., 2014). Additionally, the middle frontal gyrus is thought to be involved in linking stimulus representations based on reward payoff expectations to goal-directed actions (Bunge et al., 2001; Paulus et al., 2002). For OUDD patients, monetary stimuli may elicit the generation of an internal representation and/or past situations associated with reward, while substance-free activity images may not due to decreased engagement in such activities.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text