Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 16, Issue 1, May 2002, Pages 89-92
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Motion Artifact in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Implications for Automated Analysis

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1076Get rights and content

Abstract

Automated measures of cerebral magnetic resonance images (MRI) often provide greater speed and reliability compared to manual techniques but can be particularly sensitive to motion artifact. This study employed an automatic MRI analysis program that quantified regional gray matter volume and created images for verification and quality control. Motion artifact was assessed on each image and assigned a rating of none, mild, moderate, or severe. Greater motion artifact was associated with smaller gray matter volumes. Severity of motion artifact is an important, but often overlooked, consideration in the interpretation of automated MRI measures.

References (14)

  • J.N. Giedd et al.

    Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain

    Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • M. Hedley et al.

    Motion artifact suppression: A review of post-processing techniques

    Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (1992)
  • D. Atkinson et al.

    Automatic compensation of motion artifacts in MRI

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1999)
  • F.X. Castellanos et al.

    Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • F.X. Castellanos et al.

    Quantitative brain magnetic resonance imaging in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • D.L. Collins et al.

    ANIMAL + INSECT: Improved cortical structure segmentation

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text