Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. A double-blind, placebo-control, withinsubject (crossover) design was used in which 12 children, between 6 and 11 years of age, were each tested four times in each drug condition: 0.3 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg of methylphenidate, and placebo. Dependent measures included (a) the probability of inhibiting responses to a primary choice reaction time task given a stop signal, on the Stopping Task, and (b) response latency and errors on the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). MPH improved the efficiency of the central inhibitory mechanism by speeding the inhibitory process, thereby affording the children greater control over their actions and enabling them to increase the probability with which they inhibited responses given a stop signal. MPH increased response latency but did not reduce errors on the MFFT, and observation of the children's task performance highlighted the interpretive problems associated with this task. Performance on both tasks was better at a dosage of 1.0 mg/kg than at 0.3 mg/kg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatrie Association. (1980).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ault, R. L., Crawford, D. E., & Jeffrey, W. E. (1972). Visual scanning strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast-accurate, and slow-accurate children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test.Child Development, 43, 1412–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J., Gjerde, P. F., & Block, J. H. (1986). More misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity: Absence of construct validity in preadolescence.Developmental Psychology, 22, 820–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. T., & Sleator, E. K. (1979). Methylphenidate in hyperkinetic children: Differences in dose effects on impulsive behavior.Pediatrics, 64, 408–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. T., Slimmer, L. W., & Wynne, M. W. (1984). How much stimulant medication is appropriate for hyperactive children?Journal of School Health, 54, 128–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies in children.Psychopharmacology Bulletin, Special Issue-Pharmacotherapy in Children, 24–84.

  • Coons, H. W., Klorman, R., & Borgstedt, A. D. (1987). Effects of methylphenidate on adolescents with a childhood history of attention deficit disorder: II Information processing.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, V. I. (1984). The psychological processes implicated in ADD. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.),Attention deficit disorder: Diagnostic, cognitive, and therapeutic understanding (pp. 147–162). Jamaica, NY Spectrum.

  • Douglas, V. I., Barr, R. G., Amin, K., O'Neill, M. E., & Britton, B. G. (1988). Dosage effects and individual responsivity to methylphenidate in attention deficit disorder.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29, 453–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyette, C. H., Conners, C. K., & Ulrich, R. F. (1978). Normative data on revised Conners parent and teacher rating scales.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6, 221–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualtieri, C. T., Wargin, W., Kanoy, R., Patrick, K., Shew, C. D., Youngblood, W., Mueller, R. A., & Breese, G. (1982). Clinical studies of methylphenidate serum levels in children and adults peak levels 1–2 hours post ingestion.Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984).Manual for the Wide Range Achievement Test (revised). Wilmington, DE: Jastak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J., Rosman, B., Day, D., Albert, J., & Phillips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes.Psychological Monographs,78 (1. No. 578).

  • Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, N. M., & Sandoval, J. (1980). The prevalence of learning disabilities in a sample of children considered hyperactive.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan G. D. (1981). Attention, automaticity and the ability to stop a speeded choice response.Attention and Performance, 9, 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action.Acta Psychological, 60, 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control.Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D., Cowan, W. B., & Davis, K. A. (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, S. B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milich, R., & Kramer, J. (1984). Reflections on impulsivity: An empirical investigation of impulsivity as a construct.Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 3, 57–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham, W. E., Atkins, M., & Murphy, H. A. (1981, September). ADD with and without hyperactivity: Parent, teacher, and peer rating correlates. In W. E. Pelham (Chair),DSM-III Category of Attention Deficit Disorder: Rationale, operation, and correlates. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Peloquin, L. J., & Klorman, R. (1986). Effects of methylphenidate on normal children's mood, event-related potentials, and performance in memory scanning and vigilance.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, J., Buchsbaum, M., Zahn, T., Weingartner, H., Ludlow, C., & Mikkelsen, E. (1978). Dextroamphetamine: Cognitive and behavioral effects in normal prepubertal boys.Science, 199, 560–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, M. D., Stoner, G., DuPaul, G. J., Kelly, K. L., Tucker, S. B., & Schoeler, T. (1988). Attention deficit disorder and methylphenidate: A multilevel analysis of dose-response effects on children's impulsivity accross settings.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 1:60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovet, J. (1980). A parametric measure of reflection-impulsivity.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., & Graham, P. (1968). The reliability and validity of the psychiatric assessment of the child: I. Interview with the child.British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 563–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970).Education, health and behavior: Psychological and medical study of childhood development. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Logan, G. (1988).Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Schachar, R., Rutter, M., & Smith, A. (1981). The characteristics of situationally and pervasively hyperactive children: Implications for syndrome definition.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 22, 375–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., & Wachsmuth, R. (1984).The parent interview for child symptoms. Unpublished manuscript, Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Psychiatry.

  • Siegel, L. S., & Heaven, R. K. (1986). Categorization of learning disabilities. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.),Handbook of cognitive, social, neurological aspects of learning disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 95–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solanto, M., & Conners, C. (1982). A dose-response and time-action analysis of autonomic and behavioral effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity.Psychophysiology, 19, 658–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J., Kinsbourne, M., Roberts, W., & Zucker, K. (1978). Time-response analysis of the effects of stimulant medication on the learning ability of children referred for hyperactivity.Pediatrics, 61, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical procedures in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yando, R. M., & Kagan, J. (1970). The effect of task complexity on reflection-impulsivity.Cognitive Psychology, 1, 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was jointly funded by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation (Grant No. 963-86/88) and Health and Welfare Canada (NHRDP: Grant No. 6606-3166-42). We wish to thank Patricia Fulford and Haroldine Phair for their assistance in data collection, the children and parents who participated in this study, the referring physicians, and the pharmacy department at the Hospital for Sick Children for preparation of prescriptions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tannock, R., Schachar, R.J., Carr, R.P. et al. Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 17, 473–491 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916508

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916508

Keywords

Navigation