Abstract
Objective: To study the suggested pharmacokinetic interaction between erythromycin, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4, and clozapine.
Methods: Twelve healthy male volunteers received a single dose of 12.5 mg of clozapine alone or in combination with a daily dose of 1500 mg erythromycin in a randomised crossover study. Clozapine and its metabolites clozapine-N-oxide and desmethyl-clozapine were measured in serum samples which were collected during a 48 h period and in a sample of the urine secreted over the interval 0–12 h.
Results: There were no significant differences in mean area under the serum concentration time curves (1348 (633) nmol h · 1−1 in the control phase and 1180 (659) nmol h · 1−1 in the erythromycin phase), terminal half-lives (19 (13) h and 15 (6) h, respectively), peak serum concentrations (92 (53) nmol · 1−1 and 77 (40) nmol · 1−1, respectively), time to peak serum concentrations (1.4 (0.7) h and 1.5 (1.0) h, respectively) or apparent oral clearances of clozapine (34 (15) l · h−1 and 46 (37) l · h−1, respectively). There were no significant differences in partial metabolic clearances to clozapine-N-oxide (5.1 (3.6) l · h−1 and 7.8 (9.4) l · h−1, respectively) or to desmethyl-clozapine (1.5 (1.3) l · h−1 and 1.8 (1.7) l · h−1, respectively) or in renal clearances of clozapine (0.8 (0.5) l · h−1 and 1.0 (0.7) l · h−1, respectively) between the two phases.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that erythromycin at a clinically relevant dosage does not inhibit the metabolism of clozapine. Hence, CYP3A4 seems to be of minor importance in the disposition of clozapine in humans at least when clozapine is taken at a low single dose.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 26 August 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 8 January 1999
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hägg, S., Spigset, O., Mjörndal, T. et al. Absence of interaction between erythromycin and a single dose of clozapine. E J Clin Pharmacol 55, 221–226 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050621
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050621