Brief communication
Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(91)90308-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Male rats were screened for locomotor activity in a novel environment and divided into high (HR) and low (LR) responders based on whether their locomotor activity score for the first hour was above or below the median locomotor activity for the subject sample. Subsequently, the locomotor activity score for the peated administration of either amphetamine (AMPH; 0.5 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg), scopolamine (0.5 mg/kg) or saline was monitored in separate groups of HR and LR rats. HR rats had significantly higher overall scores than LR rats for all 3 drugs. Both HR and LR rats developed tolerance at the same rate to repeated scoppoamine administration. In contrast, only HR rats showed pronounced sensitization to the locomotor stimulating properties of AMPH and a direct correlation was evident between the locomotor response to novelty and the magnitude of sensitization. These results suggest that an individual's response to a novel environment can, to a certain extent, predict drug-induced locomotor activity and that individual differences in the response to novelty and sensitization to AMPH may result from individual variations in a common neural mechanism.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (181)

  • A systematic review of equine personality

    2020, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • Association of medial corticostriatal regions with amphetamine-induced emission of 50 kHz vocalizations as studied by Zif-268 expression in the rat brain

    2020, Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such changes are believed to underly part of an organism’s adaptive response to emotionally salient contexts (Ikemoto et al., 2015). As such, USVs and motor activity feature prominently in many experimental paradigms centered around models of addiction and sensitization (Hooks et al., 1991, 1992; Panksepp et al., 2002; Browning et al., 2011; Maier et al., 2012; Mahler et al., 2013; Simola et al., 2014; Barker et al., 2015). Several such studies have recently found that these two behavioural measurements respond differently to psychostimulant sensitization (Taracha et al., 2012, 2014; Ahrens et al., 2013; Costa et al., 2015; Garcia & Cain, 2016).

  • Social Defeat Stress, Sex, and Addiction-Like Behaviors

    2018, International Review of Neurobiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text