Elsevier

Brain and Language

Volume 15, Issue 2, March 1982, Pages 207-233
Brain and Language

Apprehending schizophrenic discourse: A structural analysis of the Listener's task

https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90057-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Characterizing aberrances specific to schizophrenic utterances, either purely in experiential terms or simply as features intrinsic to the language material itself, has demonstrated important limitations. Consequently, a model of listener interaction with text was pursued whereby constituent statements of discourse are organized on interpretation into hierarchal structures (or “bases”) according to their mutual presupposition relationships. “Coherence” was taken as the experiential signifier of a text base realization whose geometry conforms to a set of five conditions that collectively define “strong hierarchy” (SH). Violations of particular axioms yielded a typology of textual incoherence, referred to collectively as “non-strong-hierarchal” (NSH) discourse. In the experimental portion of the paper, determination of NSH discourse was found to classify speech samples randomly selected from a psychiatric population into schizophrenic and nonschizophrenic groups with a high degree of accurracy. Clinician responses to these same samples were studied. Classificatory accuracy of individual descriptive indices of “thought disorder” was found to be poor. Discriminant analyses for individual clinicians improved classificatory accuracy considerably. The two clinicians who retrospectively could be turned into the most powerful discriminators for schizophrenia also demonstrated the higher canonical correlations with the discourse analysis. These data suggest that clinician competence to a certain extent is modeled by the discourse analysis. The implications of these findings in terms of what is in the mind of the schizophrenic speaker were discussed, and a program for future research in this area was outlined.

References (41)

  • E. Bleuler

    Dementia praecox, or the group of schizophrenias

    (1950)
  • R. Brown

    Schizophrenia, language, and reality

    American Psychologist

    (1972)
  • B.D. Cohen et al.

    Referent communication disturbances in acute schizophrenics

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1974)
  • J. Davidson

    Ending structures in conversation

    (1975)
  • K.M. Davis et al.

    Overinclusion and self-editing in schizophrenia

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1976)
  • J. Deese

    Thought into speech

    American Scientist

    (1978)
  • J. Deese

    Pauses, prosody, and the demands of production in language

  • M. Edelson

    Language and interpretation in psychoanalysis

    (1975)
  • D. Foulkes et al.

    Mental activity in relaxed wakefulness

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1975)
  • C.F. Fredricksen

    Effect of talk-induced cognitive operations on comprehension and memory processes

  • Cited by (50)

    • Studying Psychosis Using Natural Language Generation: A Review of Emerging Opportunities

      2023, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
    • We both say tomato: Intact lexical alignment in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

      2022, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of particular interest is the relationship between lexical alignment and positive thought disorder, which is the most obvious clinical manifestation of linguistic communicative difficulties in schizophrenia (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Some previous studies have linked thought disorder to impairments in taking the listeners' perspective into account (Rochester et al., 1977; Hoffman et al., 1982; Hoffman, 1986; see also Rutter, 1985; Harrow et al., 1989), and to more severe impairments in mentalizing ability (Frith and Corcoran, 1996). There is also preliminary evidence that thought-disordered patients exhibit impaired alignment at other levels of linguistic representation (syntax & description types; Dwyer et al., 2020).

    • Using Language Processing and Speech Analysis for the Identification of Psychosis and Other Disorders

      2020, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Beginning in the 1980s, Hoffman and colleagues used theory and modeling to create a body of work on language in schizophrenia that informs the current emergence of automated NLP approaches. First, drawing on the hierarchical nature of language, they operationalized clinician measures of coherence in speech, with tests of classification based on random sampling of speech from a psychiatric population, finding high accuracy for discrimination of speech in schizophrenia from that of other disorders (21). Then, using discourse analysis, they showed that in schizophrenia, basic discourse structure was disrupted, while in mania, decreased coherence comes from increased shifts from one discourse structure to another (22), anticipating findings by Mota et al., who similarly discriminated language in mania from schizophrenia, using speech graph methods (16).

    • Tracking Language in Real Time in Psychosis

      2019, A Clinical Introduction to Psychosis: Foundations for Clinical Psychologists and Neuropsychologists
    • Automated analysis of written narratives reveals abnormalities in referential cohesion in youth at ultra high risk for psychosis

      2018, Schizophrenia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This has direct practical clinical relevance for understanding social dysfunction in psychosis; when a discourse lacks cohesion, listeners must work that much harder to extract meaning from the text or speech (Graesser et al., 2004; Haviland and Clark, 1974; McNamara and Graesser, 2014). Referential cohesion deficits have been consistently reported among schizophrenia patients (Ditman and Kuperberg, 2010; Ditman et al., 2011; Docherty et al., 1996; Hoffman, 1986; Hoffman et al., 1982; Noel-Jorand et al., 1997; Rochester and Martin, 1979). In a landmark study conducted by Rochester and Martin (1979), investigators developed a coding system to examine referential cohesion markers and applied this to transcribed speech of individuals with schizophrenia; the investigators found fewer referential markers used in this group compared to controls.

    • When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia

      2018, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our findings also have social implications. Some researchers have discussed referential impairments in schizophrenia as stemming from a social communicative failure—a failure to take the communicator’s assumptions into account (7,8,72) [see also (73,74)]. In practice, however, given the speed of everyday communication, establishing and drawing on common referents in real time will depend largely on the speed at which both the comprehender and producer can access relevant information from memory [see (75–78)].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text