Original article
Comparison of self-reported injection frequencies for past 30 days and 6 months among intravenous drug users

https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90024-8Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study we compared two parallel self-reported measures that now are being used to assess the recent frequency of intravenous drug use. The study sample consisted of 926 HIV seronegative drug users recruited for participation in HIV research. During a standard interview with each drug user, we first asked about injections in the past 30 days, and then about injections in the past .6 months. The correlation between reports on the past 6 months and the past 30 days was appreciable when all injections were considered (Spearman correlation coefficient ϱ = 0.78). It increased when the sample was restricted to subjects who reported injections in the past month (ϱ = 0.88). This restriction resulted in a 15% reduction of the sample size, since 137 participants reported drug use in the previous 6 months but not in the previous 30 days. Concordance tended to be slightly higher for reported frequencies of heroin injections than for cocaine injections, and for men as compared to women. The observed levels of concordance indicate that in many instances both approaches can yield comparable results. Nevertheless the choice of 30 days recall vs 6 months recall must rest upon the specific research questions of each investigation.

References (10)

  • Center for Disease Control

    Risk behaviors for HIV transmission among intravenous drug users not in drug treatment-United States 1987–1989

    MMWR

    (1990)
  • B.A. Koblin et al.

    Racial/ethnic differences in HIV-1 seroprevalence and risky behaviors among intravenous drug users in a multisite study

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1990)
  • P. Alcabes et al.

    Correlates of human immunodeficiencies virus infection in intravenous drug users: are treatment-program samples misleading?

    Br J Addic

    (1992)
  • J.F. Samuels et al.

    Measurement of HIV risk behaviors among intravenous drug users

    Br J Addic

    (1992)
  • D.L. Paulhus

    Two-component models of socially desirable responding

    J Pers Soc Psychol

    (1984)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (44)

  • Opiates

    2022, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences: Volume 1-4, Third Edition
  • Exercise decreases speedball self-administration

    2014, Life Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    From a clinical perspective, the present data indicate a protective effect of exercise on speedball self-administration. One study found that 58% of heroin users report comorbid cocaine use (Schutz et al., 1994), and some heroin-dependent individuals report using cocaine to reduce heroin withdrawal symptoms (Kosten, 1989; Rosen et al., 1992). Furthermore, treatment outcomes are worse for heroin users who also use cocaine than for those who do not use cocaine (Downey et al., 2000).

  • Speedball induced changes in electrically stimulated dopamine overflow in rat nucleus accumbens

    2011, Neuropharmacology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The co-use of cocaine and opiates, termed speedball (Leri et al., 2003a), has been on the rise since the 1970s and represents a growing subpopulation of drug abusers (Craddock et al., 1997; Greberman and Wada, 1994; Kosten et al., 1987). The prevalence of cocaine use among heroin addicts ranges from 30% to 80% (Leri et al., 2003a; Schutz et al., 1994). Negative health and social consequences of such combinations are severe, particularly when cocaine is used intravenously (Schutz et al., 1994).

  • What are the specific vs. generalized effects of drugs of abuse on neuropsychological performance?

    2011, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    Citation Excerpt :

    On the other hand, cocaine and heroin are often consumed together using freebase administration. Some studies suggest that the incidence of this type of polysubstance use is relatively high in the United States (Metzger et al., 1996; Schütz et al., 1994) and in the European Union (EMCDDA Annual Report, 2008). Similarly, a study by Butler and Montgomery (2004) revealed that in a broad sample of ecstasy users, all of them had used other illegal substances, especially stimulants and hallucinogens.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text