Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 52, Issue 4, 15 August 2002, Pages 338-348
Biological Psychiatry

Original article
Schizophrenia and affective disorder show different visual scanning behavior for faces: a trait versus state-based distinction?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01356-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Abnormal visual scanpaths to faces and facial expressions in schizophrenia may underlie schizophrenic subjects’ disturbed interpersonal communication. This study is the first to examine the specificity of these impairments to schizophrenia, by including an affective disorder psychiatric control group.

Methods: The visual scanpath performance of 65 schizophrenia, 52 affective disordered, and 61 control subjects were compared in two experiments. In the “face recognition” experiment, subjects viewed four identifiable (non-degraded) neutral faces versus four matched non-identifiable (degraded) control faces. In the “facial affect recognition” experiment, subjects viewed positive (happy), negative (sad), and neutral (control) facial emotion stimuli. Concurrent behavioral tasks were face matching (face recognition) and expression matching (facial affect recognition), each under two multiple-choice conditions (7 or 3 options).

Results: Scanpath disturbances were most apparent in schizophrenia subjects, who maintained a comparatively “restricted” scanpath style to all face stimuli. Schizophrenics subjects also showed the greatest recognition difficulties, particularly for neutral and happy faces. Scanpath parameters for affective disorder subjects differed only from the schizophrenia (but not the control) group, except for attention to facial features where they generally avoided facial features in all expressions and showed the greatest attentional problems of all groups for degraded faces.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that a global restriction of visual scanpaths is specific to schizophrenic psychosis and might be a trait marker for this disorder, whereas scanpath abnormalities in affective disorder might instead reflect severe state-based (or discrete) attentional disturbances.

Introduction

One of the core features of schizophrenia is the breakdown of interpersonal communication Cramer et al 1992, Kee et al 1998. Individuals with schizophrenia show impairments in the accurate identification of facial expressions, which is a particularly important component of effective social and interpersonal communication Bryson et al 1997, Burch 1995, Habel et al 2000, Young et al 1986. One of the possible mechanisms underlying disturbed face perception is a breakdown in the neurocognitive strategies that underlie processing of face stimuli. Accurate recognition of face and facial emotion stimuli relies upon the integration of basic visuomotor and visuo-spatial processes with more detailed interpersonal cues (Bruce and Young 1986). The visual scanpath (pattern of eye movements and foveal fixations) provides an overt and objective measure of these neurocognitive strategies in real time. Evidence from neurocognitive batteries points to the importance of visual scanning strategies to face and emotion perception in schizophrenia (Kee et al 1998).

A growing body of evidence indicates that people with schizophrenia have abnormal visual scanpaths to face stimuli Phillips et al 1998, Streit et al 1997, Sweeney et al 1994, Tsunoda et al 1992. Scanpaths in schizophrenia typically reflect a “restricted” scanpath strategy, characterized by longer fixation durations, shorter eye movements between fixations, and a lack of focused attention to salient facial features (eyes, mouth). A series of studies by our group has focused on particular aspects of abnormal scanpaths in schizophrenia. The restricted scanpath strategy was found to be particularly apparent for face stimuli compared to other complex stimuli, such as geometric figures and degraded (non-identifiable) faces, pointing to the face-specific nature of this disturbance Gordon et al 1992, Manor et al 1999, Williams et al 1999.

In a subsequent study, we examined the proposal that scanpath abnormalities would be even more apparent for facial expressions of emotion, given the increased processing load associated with affective appraisal. Compared to healthy control subjects, schizophrenia subjects showed a greater restriction of visual scanpaths and avoidance of facial features for happy compared to sad expressions (Loughland et al 2002). In an independent study of visual scanpaths and facial emotion, Streit et al (1997) also observed abnormally restricted scanpaths to “affect” stimuli (in an averaged analysis of six basic emotions), but the averaging procedure precluded the consideration of specific scanpath strategies in relation to individual emotions. Our observation that schizophrenia subjects show distinctive scanpath strategies for positive and negative facial emotion suggests that it may be important to consider individual emotions in studies of underlying neurocognitive mechanisms.

Schizophrenia disturbances in the visual scanning of faces have been shown to remain stable over time and across the acute and partially remitted phases of the illness Streit et al 1997, Wölwer et al 1996. An important outstanding issue is the diagnostic specificity of these disturbances to schizophrenia. Without psychiatric control data from a direct comparison with a distinct diagnostic group, it would remain unclear whether schizophrenia scanpath abnormalities to faces are simply the result of a general state of psychosis or illness severity (Archer et al 1992). To date, the isolated visual scanpath studies of other disorders (post-traumatic stress disorder and generalized anxiety disorder) have focused only on non-face threat stimuli Bryant et al 1995, Freeman et al 2000 but show no evidence for a schizophrenia-like scanpath dysfunction.

Face and facial emotion processing difficulties in affective disorder have been examined only in terms of discrimination accuracy using behavioral tasks. Some evidence suggests that individuals with schizophrenia have a greater impairment in facial affect discrimination than those with affective disorder, whereas the two groups may be similarly impaired for face recognition (Feinberg et al 1986). Other studies suggest that the facial emotion impairment in affective disordered individuals may be specific to negative emotion David and Cutting 1990, Gur et al 1992. Gaebel et al (1992) also observed that affect recognition deficits may have a trait-like quality in schizophrenia but may vary with state (e.g, are less apparent post-acute phase) in affective disorder. Importantly for the study of visual scanpaths, (Gaebel et al (1992) proposed that trait- versus state-based emotion deficits in these disorders reflect the function of distinct underlying psychobiological systems and are therefore expressed as different quantitative, qualitative, and temporal patterns of emotion-related dysfunction.

To determine the diagnostic specificity of both face and facial emotion disturbances to schizophrenia, we compared the visual scanpaths of schizophrenia, affective disorder, and healthy control groups on our previous face paradigm (Williams et al 1999) and facial emotion paradigm (Loughland et al 2002). Given that potentially confounding oculomotor disturbances have been associated with certain neurological disorders (e.g., prosopagnosia, certain forms of amnesia) and mental retardation David and Cutting 1990, Feinberg et al 1986, Fletcher et al 1997, Muir et al 1992, Tien et al 1996, we ensured that all subjects were screened for relevant comorbid pathology.

On the basis of our previous scanpath findings and evidence from behavioral studies, we predicted that schizophrenia subjects would be more impaired than both affective disorder and healthy control groups for visual scanning of face and facial expression stimuli. Affective disordered individuals, on the other hand, would show only minimal scanpath disturbances relative to healthy control subjects, and these would be limited to the more attention-based parameters (eg., allocation of fixations to features), consistent with a more state-based impairment. The pattern of concurrent recognition accuracy should parallel this pattern of visual scanning performance.

Section snippets

Subjects

Sixty-five outpatient subjects with schizophrenia and 52 age-matched (within 3 years) outpatient subjects with affective disorder (bipolar disorder and major depression) were recruited from hospitals and community centers in Sydney, Australia, and 61 nonpsychiatric control subjects were drawn from the general population. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects after the procedures were fully explained in accordance with National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines. Inclusion

Affective disorder group

Independent group t tests showed the two affective subgroups did not differ from each other in terms of age, depression rating, or illness duration. Multivariate analyses of variance for each of the eight eye movement parameters, with subgroup as the between-group factor and either stimulus (degraded vs. non-degraded neutral) or affect (happy, sad vs. neutral) as within-subjects factors, failed to produce any interactions involving subgroup and showed only one isolated subgroup main effect for

Discussion

Previous studies by both our group Gordon et al 1992, Loughland et al 2002, Manor et al 1999, Williams et al 1999 and others Phillips and David 1997, Phillips and David 1998, Streit et al 1997 have provided evidence for disturbances in schizophrenia in the visual scanning of faces. This study was the first to examine the diagnostic specificity of visual scanpath aberrations to schizophrenia, by including a psychiatric as well as healthy control group. Schizophrenia, affective disorder, and

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by an Australian Council Research grant and the Schizophrenia Fellowship of New South Wales, Inc (NSW).

The authors thank Chris Lisle and Dean Davidson, University of Sydney, School of Psychology for help with stimulus development and computer programming. We also thank those people who gave freely of their time to participate in this study.

References (44)

  • M.L. Phillips et al.

    Visual scan paths are abnormal in deluded schizophrenics

    Neuropsychologia

    (1997)
  • M.L. Phillips et al.

    Abnormal visual scan pathsA psychophysiological marker of delusions in schizophrenia

    Schizophr Bull

    (1998)
  • M. Streit et al.

    Facial affect recognition and visual scanning behaviour in the course of schizophrenia

    Schizophr Res

    (1997)
  • M. Tsunoda et al.

    Scanning eye movement in schizophrenic patientsRelationship to clinical symptoms and regional cerebral blood flow using I-IMP SPECT

    Schizophr Res

    (1992)
  • L.M. Williams et al.

    Visual scanpaths in schizophreniaIs there a deficit in face recognition?

    Schizophr Res

    (1999)
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    (1994)
  • J. Archer et al.

    Face processing in psychiatric conditions

    Br J Clin Psychol

    (1992)
  • A.S. Bellack et al.

    Cue availability and affect recognition in schizophrenia

    Schizophr Bull

    (1996)
  • R.P. Bental et al.

    Content-specific processing and persecutory delusionsAn investigation using the emotional Stroop test

    Br J Med Psychol

    (1989)
  • V. Bruce et al.

    Understanding face recognition

    J Psychol

    (1986)
  • J.W. Burch

    Typical range deficits in schizophrenics’ recognition of emotion in faces

    J Clin Psychol

    (1995)
  • P. Cramer et al.

    Schizophrenics and social judgement. Why do schizophrenics get it wrong?

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • Cited by (129)

    • The limited effect of neural stimulation on visual attention and social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia

      2021, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      One potentially important perceptual process is visual attention. Individuals with schizophrenia demonstrate atypical visual behaviors (Beedie et al., 2011) that may create additional challenges in social situations, attending less to salient social information like facial features (Gordon et al., 1992; Loughland et al., 2002; Nikolaides et al., 2016; Sasson et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2003). Further, aberrant gaze patterns correlate with mentalizing ability (Roux et al., 2014), as more normative visual attention relates to better performance (Simpson et al., 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text