Short communication
Affinities of venlafaxine and various reuptake inhibitors for the serotonin and norepinephrine transporters

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00241-6Get rights and content

Abstract

In vitro radioligand binding studies were carried out in rat brain membranes to assess the affinity of various reuptake inhibitors for the serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) and the norepinephrine transporters using the selective ligands [3H]cyanoimipramine and [3H]nisoxetine, respectively. The selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors paroxetine, indalpine and fluvoxamine displayed a high affinity for the 5-HT transporter, whereas the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desipramine had a high affinity for the norepinephrine transporter. Duloxetine, a dual 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, displayed a high affinity for both the 5-HT and the norepinephrine transporters. Interestingly, venlafaxine, a dual 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, displayed only a moderate affinity for the 5-HT transporter (Ki=74 nM) and a very low affinity for the norepinephrine transporter (Ki=1.26 μM). The relatively low affinities of venlafaxine contrast with its potent in vivo 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake blocking properties. These results raise the possibility that the in vivo effects on the 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake observed with venlafaxine may not be mediated solely by its binding to the [3H]cyanoimipramine and [3H]nisoxetine binding sites.

Introduction

Several lines of evidence point towards the involvement of the serotonergic (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and norepinephrine systems in the mechanism of action of antidepressant treatments (Blier and De Montigny, 1994). Hence, a new class of drugs known as dual 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors has been developed. For instance, venlafaxine blocks in vitro the synaptosomal uptake of both [3H]5-HT and [3H]norepinephrine (Muth et al., 1986; Bolden-Watson and Richelson, 1993). Clinical studies are now suggesting that not only venlafaxine displays antidepressant activity, but that it (i) would also be more efficacious than fluoxetine for the treatment of major depression (Dierick et al., 1996), (ii) would be effective in the treatment of resistant depression (Nierenberg et al., 1994; De Montigny et al., 1996) and, finally, (iii) would show an early onset of action (Rickels, 1991). However, while venlafaxine shows an appreciable potency for inhibiting both 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptakes in vivo (Béı̈que et al., 1996), its potency to block in vitro the uptake of these monoamines is relatively low when compared to other reuptake inhibitors such as paroxetine for 5-HT uptake or desipramine for norepinephrine uptake (Bolden-Watson and Richelson, 1993). This latter observation, combined with the potentially unique therapeutic profile of venlafaxine, thus underscores the importance of a more accurate understanding of its pharmacological actions.

The present study was thus undertaken to directly determine the affinities of venlafaxine for both the 5-HT and norepinephrine transporters. To this end, the selective radioligands [3H]cyanoimipramine and [3H]nisoxetine, that bind selectively to the 5-HT and norepinephrine transporters, respectively (Burkard, 1980; Dumbrille-Ross and Tang, 1983; Tejani-Butt et al., 1990), were used. In order to provide a direct within study comparison, the affinities for the 5-HT and norepinephrine transporters of other monoamine reuptake inhibitors have also been determined, as well as those of duloxetine, an antidepressant candidate, which is also a dual 5-HT and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (Wong et al., 1993; Kasamo et al., 1996).

Section snippets

Animals

Male Sprague–Dawley rats (250–275 g) were used.

Radioligand binding procedures

Binding assays were performed on total brain minus cerebellum using procedures modified from Burkard (1980)and Dumbrille-Ross and Tang (1983)for [3H]cyanoimipramine binding and from Tejani-Butt et al. (1990)for [3H]nisoxetine binding. Brains were homogenized in 50 vol Tris–HCl buffer (50 mM, pH: 7.4). Following centrifugation (40 000×g, 10 min at 4°C), the pellet was washed (3×) by resuspension and centrifugation. For [3H]cyanoimipramine binding,

Saturation studies

Nonlinear regression analysis of the saturation curves obtained following the incubation with different concentrations of [3H]cyanoimipramine and [3H]nisoxetine with rat brain homogenates indicated that each of these two radioligands labels a single class of saturable binding sites with a Hill coefficient close to unity. [3H]Cyanoimipramine binding yielded a Kd of 0.61±0.13 nM and a Bmax of 225.5±31.8 fmol/mg proteins whereas for [3H]nisoxetine a Kd of 0.76±0.042 nM and a Bmax of 63.60±5.91

Discussion

In the present study, duloxetine displayed a high and nearly equivalent affinity for both transporters, while venlafaxine, surprisingly, had only a moderate affinity for the 5-HT transporter and a low affinity for the norepinephrine transporter.

[3H]Cyanoimipramine has been shown to bind to a site that is associated with the 5-HT transporter, and the reported Kd values are in keeping with the one reported in the present study (Burkard, 1980; Dumbrille-Ross and Tang, 1983). Similarly, [3H

Summary

The present study provides novel data on the binding affinities of duloxetine and venlafaxine for the 5-HT and norepinephrine transporters. Duloxetine binds with high affinity to both transporters in keeping with previous biochemical and electrophysiological studies. However, the binding profile of venlafaxine to the two transporters reported herein would be predictive of a much weaker blockade of both the 5-HT, and norepinephrine reuptake process by venlafaxine than that reported in functional

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by the Medical Research Council of Canada (C. de M.). J.C.B. is in receipt of a Royal Victoria Hospital Research Institute Fellowship and G.D. of a Scholarship from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text