Research reportCompetition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex’s involvement in top-down control: an event-related fMRI study of the stroop task
Introduction
The ability to select between task-relevant and task-irrelevant information is a basic aspect of attentional function. Neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies indicate a role for prefrontal cortex in this process, as it provides a top-down bias that favors the selection of task-relevant information (e.g. [2], [22], [29], [33], [38]). Here we argue that such a bias is especially important for exerting attentional control when task-irrelevant information can effectively compete with task-relevant information for priority in processing.
As discussed by Frith [17] and others (e.g. [15]), the perceptually-related properties of a task-irrelevant stimulus (e.g. brightness) can increase its salience relative to a task-relevant stimulus, thereby favoring its processing and allowing associated representations to effectively compete for priority in processing. Top-down control by prefrontal cortex is required to overcome such a bias [25]. Another situation in which top-down control is required because task-irrelevant information can effectively compete for priority in processing occurs when task-irrelevant information is processed relatively automatically. In such cases, task-irrelevant representations and/or associated responses are activated to a high degree [12]. A classic example is provided by the Stroop task, in which an individual must identify a word’s ink color while ignoring its identity. Since word-reading is a relatively automatic process, the word activates task-irrelevant information (i.e. semantic and phonological representations as well as their associated responses) to a high degree, despite attempts to ignore it. Because processing of this task-irrelevant information occurs to a high degree, it is extremely effective at interfering with the processing of task-relevant information. As a result, there is an increased need for top-down control by PFC to select the correct information that should be used to guide performance, as demonstrated in numerous studies of the Stroop task and its variants [2], [31], [32]. Finally, other attributes of task-irrelevant information, such as its emotional value, can sometimes increase its ability to compete. For example, emotionally laden information, especially when arousing or negative, is effective at capturing attention [51], [53], leading to an increased need for top-down control by PFC [51], [53].
Two recent studies in our laboratory support the idea that PFC’s involvement in top-down control increases when task-irrelevant information can effectively compete for priority in processing. In one study [31], we found greater PFC activity when task-irrelevant information is related to the task at hand than when it is not. More specifically, in the color-word Stroop task, we found increases in PFC’s activity when the task-irrelevant information introduced by the word was color-related (relative to neutral words), regardless of whether or not it conflicted with task-relevant color information. Thus, we observed greater PFC activity for both congruent (e.g. the word ‘red’ in red ink) and incongruent (the word ‘blue’ in red ink) color-word trials relative to neutral-word trials (e.g. the word ‘bond’ in red ink). The task-irrelevant information introduced by the word is better able to compete for priority in processing on both congruent and incongruent color-word trials than on neutral-word trials, as it is related to the task concept (color). We observed additional PFC activity for incongruent trials relative to congruent and neutral-word trials, probably due to their ability to compromise selection of the correct response.
The findings of a second study by our laboratory are also consistent with our hypothesis, as they suggest that activity within PFC increases with the number of levels at which a stimulus can compete for priority in processing [32]. Using a manual version of the color-word Stroop task, we examined increases in neural activity associated with two different types of incongruent trials (response-eligible, response-ineligible) relative to that associated with neutral trials. On response-eligible incongruent trials, the incongruent color-word names a possible response (e.g. the word ‘blue’ in yellow ink, when blue, yellow, and green are the possible ink colors). For these trials, task-irrelevant information is present and can compete for priority in processing at both the response and non-response levels. On response-ineligible trials, the incongruent color-word does not name a possible response (e.g. the word ‘purple’ in yellow ink, when blue, yellow, and green are the possible ink colors), and hence can only compete at non-response levels. Consistent with our hypothesis, DLPFC activity was greater, relative to neutral trials, for response-eligible trials, which could introduce competing information at both response and non-response levels of processing, than for response-ineligible trials, which introduce competing information at just non-response levels. Interestingly, we noted increases in activity (relative to neutral trials) within anterior cingulate cortex only for response-eligible incongruent trials, not response-ineligible trials, implicating this prefrontal structure in response-related processes, not top-down control (see [31], [37], and [36] for additional evidence of the cingulate’s activity being linked specifically to response-related processes).
Here, we further explore the possibility that PFC’s involvement in control is dependent upon the ability of task-irrelevant information to compete for priority by examining another variable, frequency of occurrence. Although fMRI studies using priming and oddball paradigms have consistently demonstrated greater neural activity in prefrontal regions for the processing of relatively novel or infrequently occurring information when it is task-relevant, such investigations have not focused on information that is task-irrelevant. When task-irrelevant information occurs infrequently it should be better able to compete for priority in processing, as it is relatively novel and hence more salient [7].
To test our hypothesis that PFC’s involvement in control increases in response to the ability of task-irrelevant information to compete for priority in processing, we determined if PFC’s activity is greater for infrequently occurring task-irrelevant information than frequently occurring task-irrelevant information. To accomplish this, we employed an oddball variant of the Stroop task that made use of two sets of neutral words—the first was baseline neutral trials, which comprised the majority of trials (86%), and the second was oddball neutral trials, which occurred with a much lower frequency. If as we suggested, PFC’s involvement in top-down control is dependent upon the ability of task-irrelevant information to compete for priority in processing, increases in activity should be noted for oddball neutral trials relative to baseline neutral trials.
The second goal of the present study was to determine if the subregions of PFC sensitive to infrequently occurring task-irrelevant information overlap with those engaged when task-irrelevant information conflicts with task-relevant information, as on incongruent trials in the Stroop task. To accomplish this, we included oddball incongruent trials as well as oddball neutral trials. Task-irrelevant information introduced by incongruent color-words has a unique ability to compete for priority in processing, as it is both related to the task at hand and able to interfere with selecting the correct representation on which a response should be based. Hence, we examined whether the additional ability of task-irrelevant information to compete with task-relevant information on incongruent trials leads to further increases in activity within the same regions of PFC as activated by neutral oddball trials, or whether activation is observed in additional and distinct subregions of the PFC.
The third goal of our study was to re-examine the impact of response eligibility on increases in neural activity within prefrontal regions. A prior study in our laboratory [32] indicated that the ACC was impervious to the occurrence of conflict at non-response levels. Not only did we find that it exhibited greater activity during response-eligible than response-ineligible trials, but we found no significant difference in activity for response-ineligible and neutral trials. Thus, as long as the word did not name a possible response, no ACC activity was noted. However, other studies have indicated that the ACC is most responsive to novel or infrequent events [8], [54]. Thus, we reasoned that if the ACC has any sensitivity to non-response related conflict, it might be detectable with an oddball design in which the trial types of interest occur with low frequency.
To review, we made use of an oddball design, in which the majority of trials were neutral trials (referred to as baseline neutrals), with oddball trials occurring once every six to eight trials. Three oddball trial types were included: (1) neutral word trials; (2) response-ineligible incongruent trials; and (3) response-eligible incongruent trials. While we expected that all three oddball types would produce increases in neural activity due to their low frequency of occurrence, we expected activations to be more extensive for interference trials, due to their ability to activate representations of conflicting color information, which would provide them with a greater ability to compete for priority in processing. Finally, we expected response-eligible trials to produce greater increases in neural activity than response-ineligible trials, as they can compete with task-relevant information at more levels of processing.
Section snippets
Stimuli/design
The Stroop task was programmed using Mel V2.0 and presented using an IBM-PC compatible computer. We made use of an oddball design, in which participants were presented a series of neutral word trials, with an oddball trial occurring every six to eight trials. Three types of oddball trials were included: incongruent-eligible, incongruent-ineligible, and neutral.
The stimuli consisted of words presented in one of three colors: blue, green and yellow. The word set for incongruent-eligible trials
Regions sensitive to the frequency of irrelevant information
The first goal of our analysis was to identify regions sensitive to the frequency with which task-irrelevant materials were presented (see Fig. 1A and Table 1). Regression analyses revealed increases in activity throughout left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (primarily posterior) and posterior inferior prefrontal cortex common to all three oddball trial types (neutral, incongruent-ineligible, incongruent-eligible) relative to baseline neutrals. Our confirmatory conjunction analysis verified
Discussion
Our findings indicate that neural activity within DLPFC and PIPFC, two regions previously implicated in top-down control, is influenced by three factors: the frequency with which task-irrelevant information is presented, the ability of task-irrelevant information to introduce conflicting task-irrelevant information, and the number of levels at which such conflict or interference can occur. As such, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that top-down control by PFC increases in response
Summary
In sum, the present study provided support for our hypothesis that PFC’s involvement in attentional control increases with the ability of task-irrelevant information to compete for priority in processing. We found PFC’s activity to be sensitive to each of three factors: the frequency with which task-irrelevant information is presented, the ability of task-irrelevant information to introduce conflicting color information, and the number of levels at which such conflict or interference could
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign and performed with support from Carle Clinic, Urbana, Illinois. An NIMH MD/PhD pre-doctoral National Research Service Award (MH12415-01) provided support for the principal investigator. The authors would like to thank Gregory DiGirolamo for his various discussions with us concerning the roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in the Stroop task, as
References (55)
- et al.
Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: evidence from fMRI
Cogn. Brain Res.
(2000) - et al.
Attentional selection and the processing of task-irrelevant information: insights from fMRI examinations of the Stroop task
Prog. Brain Res.
(2001) - et al.
A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices
Cogn. Brain Res.
(2001) - et al.
Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance
Neuroimage
(1995) - et al.
Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex (review)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2001) A framework for studying the neural basis of attention
Neuropsychologia
(2001)- et al.
Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action
Neuropsychologia
(2001) - et al.
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Med. Image Anal.
(2001) - et al.
The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex (review)
Neuropsychologia
(2001) - et al.
Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding
Neuron
(1998)
Neuroanatomic overlap of working memory and spatial attention networks: a functional MRI comparison within subjects
Neuroimage
Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task
Brain Cogn.
The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict
Cogn. Brain Res.
The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour
Neuropsychologia
Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task
Neuropsychologia
Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies
Neuroimage
Prefrontal contributions to executive control: fMRI evidence for functional distinctions within lateral prefrontal cortex
Neuroimage
The emotional counting Stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division
Biol. Psychiatry
The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention
Neuron
Corticocortical connections of anatomically and physiologically defined subdivisions within the inferior parietal lobule
J. Comp Neurol.
fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Organization of afferent inputs to subdivisions of area 8 in the rhesus monkey
J. Comp. Neurol.
An fMRI version of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test reveals multiple color-selective areas in human ventral occipitotemporal cortex
Cereb. Cortex.
Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors
Cereb. Cortex
The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI
Hum Brain Mapp.
Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect (review)
Psychol. Rev.
Cited by (237)
Sports game intervention aids executive function enhancement in children with autism - An fNIRS study
2024, Neuroscience LettersDisentangling three different conflicts at non-response/semantic and response levels in a new stroop-matching task
2024, Learning and MotivationFrontal P300 asymmetry and congruence judgment: Retroactive switching is impaired during school day mornings in female adolescents
2024, Current Research in NeurobiologyCortical thickness predicts remission of depression with antidepressants in patients with late-life depression and cognitive impairment
2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
- 1
Tel.: +1-303-492-6655; fax: +1-303-492-2967.