Disturbed transcallosally mediated motor inhibition in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
Introduction
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a frequent neuropsychiatric syndrome in childhood with a prevalance of 3–6% (August et al., 1996, Rohde et al., 1999, Wender et al., 2001). It is characterized by inattentiveness and impulsivity, but the most outstanding symptom of ADHD is motor hyperactivity. Although pathomorphological studies revealed volumetric changes of the caudate nucleus (Castellanos et al., 1994, Filipek et al., 1997, Mataro et al., 1997), the cerebellum (Berquin et al., 1998) and the corpus callosum (CC) (Hynd et al., 1991, Giedd et al., 1994, Steere and Arnsten, 1995), the pathophysiology of ADHD is not well understood. fMRI studies showed that boys suffering from ADHD had longer T2-relaxation times in the putamen bilaterally compared to healthy controls (Teicher et al., 2000). Thus ADHD symptoms may be related to functional abnormalities of the putamen, an anatomical structure considered to be involved in the regulation of motor behaviour. Compatible with this view were PET studies of Lou et al. (1989), demonstrating a decrease of striatal activity as a cardinal feature of ADHD, and of Ernst et al. (1999) showing dysfunctions of dopaminergic nuclei (including caudate nucleus, putamen, frontal cortex, and midbrain (i.e. substantia nigra and ventral tegmentum)). In addition, abnormal low activations of prefrontal systems involved in voluntary regulation of motor control were found (Casey et al., 1997, Rubia et al., 1999). Furthermore event related potentials using oddball and reaction time paradigms in ADHD disclosed inhibitory control deficits as well as impaired orienting to cues (see, for example, Brandeis et al., 1998, van Leeuwen et al., 1998, Pliszka et al., 2000).
Motor hyperactivity in ADHD can be understood either as a result of abnormal facilitation or of defective inhibition of motor programs. Transcranial magnetic cortex stimulation (TMS) is a neurophysiological tool to study non-invasively the motor system in man (Ziemann et al., 1996a, Ziemann et al., 1996b, Ziemann, 2001). Using TMS in ADHD, Moll et al. (1999) found normal central motor latencies as well as unaffected postexcitatory inhibition times (cortical silent period (cSP)). However, they also reported that a sub-threshold conditioning stimulus in a paired pulse paradigm (PPI) produced less inhibition of test stimulus amplitude in ADHD children and in children with a combination of Tic/Tourette and ADHD than in controls (Moll et al., 2000, Moll et al., 2001 indicating a deficit of intracortical motor inhibition in ADHD.
Previous studies have shown that TMS induces not only a response in muscles contralateral to the stimulation, but also a transient inhibition of voluntary tonic muscle activity in ipsilateral hand muscles (Wassermann et al., 1991, Ferbert et al., 1992). This ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is thought to be mediated by transcallosal fibers and inhibitory interneurons affecting the neuronal network between the primary motor cortex layer III contralateral to stimulation—the projection site of transcallosal motor fibers—and cortex layer V, the origin of the pyramidal tract (Meyer et al., 1995, Meyer et al., 1998, Meyer, 1996). Thus iSP is considered to reflect the functional integrity of the transcallosal fibers connecting corresponding motorcortices (Ferbert et al., 1992, Meyer et al., 1995). As a whole, cSP and PPI are considered to be parameters of ipsilaterally TMS-induced intracortical motor inhibition, whereas iSP is used to assess transcallosally mediated motor inhibition between both hemispheres (Ziemann et al., 1996a, Ziemann et al., 1996b).
Since pathomorphological investigations have shown that the volume of the anterior part of the truncus and the rostrum of the CC is decreased in ADHD compared to controls (Hynd et al., 1991, Giedd et al., 1994, Steere and Arnsten, 1995), it is reasonable to assume that disturbances of fiber tracts of CC mediating transcallosal inhibition may contribute to motor hyperactivity. It was the aim of our study to find out if iSP was selectively disturbed in children with ADHD as compared to age- and sex-matched control subjects, and if this were the case, whether iSP could be used as a functional neurophysiological parameter to discriminate ADHD from controls.
Section snippets
Patients and subjects
The study included 13 right-handed ADHD children (11 boys, 2 girls) with normal intelligence aged 100–164 months (mean/SD: 129.8±20.3 months). The diagnosis ADHD was based on the research criteria of DSM-IV. Conners questionaire in short form (Goyette et al., 1978) using a score-range from 0 to 30 was applied to quantify hyperactive behaviour. All children with ADHD had Conners-Scores higher and control subjects lower than 15. Patient data were compared with those of a sex- and age-matched
Results
No differences were found between ADHD- and control group for RMT (m/SD for ADHD 57±16%, control group 56±19%) as well as for MEP-amplitudes (ADHD 3.04±2.1 mV, control group 3.49±2.54 mV, p=0.63; see Table 1). Bilateral MEP-responses could be elicitated in 4 ADHD children (mean age 107 months) and in 5 children of the control group (mean age 122 months).
cSPs were elicitable in all children, and the duration of cSP was also similar in both groups (ADHD 187.1±23.2 ms, controls 175.4±37.6 ms, p
Discussion
This study demonstrates that iSP-latencies and -duration were abnormal in children with ADHD as compared to controls, whereas MEP-amplitudes, RMT and cSP were similar. iSP-abnormalities were not correlated with Conners-Scores in ADHD.
Conclusions
In summary our data revealing abnormal iSP are compatible with the view that pathophysiological mechanisms inducing motor hyperactivity in ADHD include a reduction of transcallosally mediated motor inhibition, possibly reflecting defective myelination of fast conducting transcallosal fibers as well as an imbalance of inhibitory and exitatory drive on neuronal networks between cortex layers III and V. In doubtful cases abnormal iSP may help to differentiate children with ADHD from non-affected
References (51)
- et al.
Neuroelectric mapping reveals precursor of stop failures in children with attention deficits
Behav Brain Res
(1998) - et al.
Implication of right frontostriatal circuitry in response inhibition and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
Demyelination and axonal degeneration in corpus callosum assessed by analysis of transcallosally mediated inhibition in multiple sclerosis
Clin Neurophysiol
(1999) - et al.
Deficient intracortical inhibition in drug-naive children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder is enhanced by methylphenidate
Neurosci Lett
(2000) - et al.
Effects of methylphenidate on preschool children with ADHD: cognitive and behavioral functions
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
The topographical distribution of interhemispheric projections in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey
Brain Res
(1971) - et al.
Inhibitory control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: event-related potentials identify the processing component and timing of an impaired right-frontal response-inhibition mechanism
Biol Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
ADHD in a school sample of Brazilian adolescents: a study of prevalence, comorbid conditions, and impairments
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1994) - et al.
The silent period after transcranial magnetic stimulation is of exclusive cortical origin: evidence from isolated cortical ischemic lesions in man
Neurosci Lett
(1994)