Neurobiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder: insights into neural circuitry dysfunction through mouse genetics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.010Get rights and content

The precise causal factors for obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are not known, although, decades of research have honed in on the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuitry in the brain as a critical pathway involved in obsessions and the intimately linked compulsive–repetitive behaviors. Recent progress in human and mouse genetics have led to the identification of novel candidate susceptibility genes, which in turn have facilitated a more focused approach to unraveling the nature of circuitry dysfunction in OCD. The ability to perform invasive techniques in genetic animal models of OCD will be crucial for rapid advances in this field, and as such we review the most recent developments and highlight the importance of searching out common circuitry defects underlying compulsive–repetitive behaviors.

Highlights

OCD is a prevalent neuropsychiatric disorder. ► Cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical circuits are central to OCD core features. ► Several recently described genetic mouse models exhibit OCD-like behaviors. ► Genetic mouse models may help researchers identify common circuitry defects in OCD. ► Common circuitry defects may also help to explain key aspects of autism spectrum disorders.

Introduction

Despite the fact that the causes of OCD remain elusive, in recent years this disorder, once considered relatively obscure, has experienced a reemergence in the public consciousness. This is underscored by the creation of not one, but two separate reality/documentary-style television shows dedicated to this topic within the past two years (‘OCD Project’ which aired on VH1 and ‘Obsessed’ which aired on A&E). Perhaps this is the result of a growing acceptance that OCD is not obscure, but rather, ranks among the most prevalent neuropsychiatric disorders such as major depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder.

It is estimated that the lifetime prevalence of OCD is 1–3% in the general population [1, 2], suggesting that within each of our social networks we may find family members, friends, or colleagues that live with this often debilitating condition. While there are several treatment options currently available [3, 4], the stark reality is that there remains a significant percentage of OCD sufferers that are either non-responsive or only partially responsive to the available treatment paradigms. Furthermore, last-resort invasive procedures such as deep brain stimulation or surgical procedures have had mixed success in alleviating severe symptoms [5], and thus these options remain an empirical art that is far from being mastered. This highlights the importance of continued research into the precise causes of OCD and continued exploration of novel targets that have promise to one day bring relief to all in need.

Section snippets

Theoretical framework for circuitry dysfunction in OCD

Diverse functional brain imaging technologies have allowed researchers to delve deep into the brains of OCD patients to seek out aberrations in neural circuits that control behavior. Over the past 25 years these non-invasive imaging approaches have consistently identified abnormal patterns of activity in a particular circuit, the CSTC loop [6••] (Figure 1), and these studies have been highly influential in synthesizing the modern views on the neurobiology of OCD. Perhaps equally important over

Sapap3 null mice

SAP90/PSD95-associated protein 3 (SAPAP3) belongs to a family of four homologous genes encoding SAPAP proteins that are widely yet differentially expressed in the nervous system [17]. SAPAP3 is localized to the postsynaptic density (PSD) at excitatory synapses and is the only family member strongly expressed in the striatum. Genetic deletion of Sapap3 in mice caused behavioral abnormalities consisting of increased anxiety and compulsive self-grooming to the point of facial hair loss and skin

In search of a common neural circuitry defect

Despite the varying degrees to which each genetic mouse model recapitulates core aspects of the human condition of OCD, some notable commonalities have emerged. First, no single model is sufficient to recapitulate the entirety of the human condition of OCD. This is especially true given that the presence and content of obsessional thinking that is intimately tied to compulsive behavior is perhaps impossible to assess in a mouse [12]. Thus, it is important to focus on robust and easily

Conclusions and future perspectives

Searching out common circuitry defects in genetic animal models of OCD and various other disorders with overlap in the domain of compulsive–repetitive behaviors represents one of the most promising directions for future research in this field. In this respect it is important to urge inclusive (yet with tempered skepticism) as opposed to dismissive views concerning novel animal models. No animal model will adequately capture all aspects of a complex human disorder, yet significant aspects of

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Tanya Daigle for constructive comments on the manuscript. G.F. is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIMH R01MH081201), The Hartwell Foundation, Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI), Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, and the SPARC program from Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. J.T.T. would like to acknowledge support from NARSAD: The Brain and Behavior Research Fund (Young Investigator Award) and the NIMH (Ruth L.

References (44)

  • Y. Wang et al.

    A screen of SLC1A1 for OCD-related alleles

    Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet

    (2009)
  • M.M. Weissman et al.

    The cross national epidemiology of obsessive compulsive disorder. The Cross National Collaborative Group

    J Clin Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • M. Karno et al.

    The epidemiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder in five US communities

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • M.A. Jenike

    Clinical practice. obsessive–compulsive disorder

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • W.I. Haynes et al.

    High-frequency stimulation of deep brain structures in obsessive–compulsive disorder: the search for a valid circuit

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2010)
  • G.E. Alexander et al.

    Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1986)
  • R.L. Albin et al.

    The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders

    Trends Neurosci

    (1989)
  • M.R. DeLong

    Primate models of movement disorders of basal ganglia origin

    Trends Neurosci

    (1990)
  • C.R. Gerfen

    The neostriatal mosaic: multiple levels of compartmental organization in the basal ganglia

    Annu Rev Neurosci

    (1992)
  • S. Korff et al.

    Animal models of obsessive–compulsive disorder: rationale to understanding psychobiology and pharmacology

    Psychiatr Clin North Am

    (2006)
  • J.T. Ting et al.

    Glutamatergic synaptic dysfunction and obsessive–compulsive disorder

    Curr Chem Genomics

    (2008)
  • D. Joel

    Current animal models of obsessive compulsive disorder: a critical review

    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • Cited by (97)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text