Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 52, March 2014, Pages 28-34
Cortex

Note
The role of human basolateral amygdala in ambiguous social threat perception

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.12.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the amygdala (AMG) plays a role in how affective signals are processed. Animal research has allowed this role to be better understood and has assigned to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) an important role in threat perception. Here we show that, when passively exposed to bodily threat signals during a facial expressions recognition task, humans with bilateral BLA damage but with a functional central-medial amygdala (CMA) have a profound deficit in ignoring task-irrelevant bodily threat signals.

Introduction

It is a common experience that an angry face feels more menacing when accompanied by a pair of fists, but it is rather unsettling when the fists come with a smile. In that case we experience the overall signal as profoundly ambiguous. When instructed to attend to only the facial expression, the brain notices the conflict between the facial expression and the accompanying bodily expression in a matter of milliseconds (Meeren, van Heijnsbergen, & de Gelder, 2005).

A variety of functions related to affective processes have been attributed to the amygdala (AMG) including immediate perception of affective stimuli, learning and conditioning, as well as emotional memory (Phelps & LeDoux, 2005). The AMG is also involved in modulating behavioral responses and has multiple connections to brain areas directly involved in behavioral output (Mosher, Zimmerman, & Gothard, 2010). There is also overwhelming evidence that the AMG plays an important role in regulating emotion perception and preparing adapted motor behavior (Phelps & LeDoux, 2005).

Previous research has shown that the AMG plays an important role in face (Costafreda, Brammer, David, & Fu, 2008) and body (de Gelder, Snyder, Greve, Gerard, & Hadjikhani, 2004) expression recognition and is also highly sensitive to ambiguous signals (Kim et al., 2004, Whalen, 1998). But further progress in understanding the AMG will require understanding the specific contribution of the multiple nuclei of the AMG. Functions or loss of functions ascribed to the AMG as a whole may in fact result from activation of AMG nuclei or inter- and intra-amygdala connectivity. For example, facial expression recognition has been attributed to the AMG as a whole (Rutishauser et al., 2011) and consequently it was assumed that AMG damage abolishes this (Adolphs, Tranel, Damasio, & Damasio, 1994, but see Tsuchiya, Moradi, Felsen, Yamazaki, & Adolphs, 2009). But more recently it was shown that an impairment of one of the AMG nuclei, the basolateral amygdala (BLA), leads to hypersensitivity for facial fear expressions (Terburg et al., 2012).

Similarly, the same complete AMG impairment does not seems to abolish body expression recognition (Atkinson, Heberlein, & Adolphs, 2007). This finding does not rule out that an impairment of a specific nucleus of the AMG does nevertheless have consequences for normal processing of body expressions. In the case of a complex structure like the AMG a functional role attributed to the AMG as a whole cannot be attributed automatically to each of its subnuclei.

We addressed the issue of the functional role of the BLA in ambiguous social threat perception using subjects with Urbach–Wiethe disease (UWD), a rare genetic disorder that in our sample has resulted in bilateral focal calcification of the BLA. We tested three subjects from the South African UWD cohort (Thornton et al., 2008) selected for this specific BLA damage (Morgan, Terburg, Thornton, Stein, & van Honk, 2012) and a group of matched controls on a series of face and body expression recognition tasks. Our goal was first, to investigate the specific role of the BLA in implicit bodily expression recognition and second, the role of the BLA in ambiguity perception. We used angry and fearful Face Body Compounds created by combining a facial expression with either a congruent or incongruent bodily expression. Using convergent evidence from behavior and eye tracking measures, we investigated how BLA damage affects the processing of affective information from body expressions of anger and fear that are, unattended, not task relevant, and presented in the periphery. We conjectured that under these conditions of implicit perception participants with BLA damage would still process the threatening body signals and these signals would be more salient than in normal controls. Therefore we expect an increased effect from threatening bodily expressions on facial expression perception in the UWD group.

Section snippets

Subjects

Three subjects from the South African UWD cohort (Morgan et al., 2012, Thornton et al., 2008) without any history of secondary psychopathology or epileptic insults and 12 matched controls participated in the experiment. The UWD and control group were all female and matched for age and IQ (see Table 1 for demographic data). All participants were from mountain-desert villages near the Namibian border. Detailed neuropsychological assessment of the UWD group is described elsewhere (Morgan et al.,

Results

In line with previous results (Terburg et al., 2012), UWD participants performed as well as the controls in recognizing congruent fearful and angry Face Body Compounds (U = 7, p = .14 and U = 6, p = .13, respectively). However, recognition of fearful (U = 1.5, p = .02, r = −.62) and angry faces (U = 5, p = .06, r = −.49) was impaired when a face was combined with an incongruent bodily expression (see Fig. 2B). This incongruence effect was significantly larger in the UWD group compared to the

Discussion

Our main result shows a strong and selective effect of unattended body signals on facial expression recognition in UWD subjects. This means that BLA damage leads to a stronger interference in a simple facial expression recognition task when the target face is paired with a bodily expression shown in the periphery that is not attended to. In other words, ignoring the role of the task-irrelevant stimulus part appears harder for UWD subjects and their impaired facial expression judgments reflect

Role of funding source

B.d.G. and R.H. were partly funded by the project TANGO. The project TANGO acknowledges the financial support of the Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) programme within the Seventh Framework Programme for Research of the European Commission, under FET-Open grant number: 249858. B.d.G. has also received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement number 295673. The work in this paper was supported by

Conflict of interest

None.

References (23)

  • K. Amunts et al.

    Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps

    Anatomy and Embryology

    (2005)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Early lifetime experience of urban living predicts social attention in real world crowds

      2022, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      These changes and our findings as a possible consequence could be the result of a repeated infringement of personal space and in particular a repeated exposure to strangers in cities, which trigger the brains' threat system, thus facilitating chronic engagement of the amygdala (e.g., Hoffmann, Maran, & Sachse, 2020; Lederbogen et al., 2011). This reveals an interesting convergence, as the same brain region seems in fact relevant both for interpersonal space sensitivity (Kennedy & Adolphs, 2014) and for the control of eye-movements in threat detection (Adolphs, 2008; de Gelder et al., 2014). The second explanatory approach considers another major function of social gaze behavior beyond information gathering, particularly social signaling (Rogers et al., 2018).

    • The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception

      2021, Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, the amygdala allocates processing resources for ambiguous and biologically salient stimuli: the positive and the negative interpretation of an ambiguous face corresponding to different patterns of amygdala activation (Kim et al., 2004; Kim, Somerville, Johnstone, Alexander, & Whalen, 2003). On the other hand, the amygdala is in charge of threat perception for both animate (Adolphs, 2008; De Gelder et al., 2014) and non-animate (Coker-Appiah et al., 2013) threatening stimuli. Combined with the current data, we speculate that the modulation of the three factors on the perceptual content of bistable biological motion may not depend on anatomically earlier visual cortex such as MT but involves the processing of STS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text