Brief report
Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: A pilot study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.11.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Depressed patients exhibit cognitive biases, including maladaptive self-focus. In a previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) activation during self-referential versus semantic processing was unique to patients, as was the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activation. The aim of this pilot study was to examine whether this pattern was stable over the course of depression.

Methods

Sixteen participants (8 depressed inpatients, 8 healthy controls) viewed personality traits during fMRI and judged whether each trait described them or not (‘self’ condition), or whether it described a socially desirable trait or not (‘general’ condition). There were 2 scanning sessions with an interval of at least 6 weeks, in which patients received an antidepressant treatment.

Results

After a mean duration of 9 weeks, depressed patients displayed a more balanced activation of the left DLPFC but a greater activation of the dorsal MPFC in ‘self’ versus ‘general’ condition remained.

Limitations

The small sample size and heterogeneous clinical features prevented subgroups analyses between responders and non-responders.

Conclusions

The change of the left DLPFC activation suggests that antidepressants are associated with a more balanced allocation of cognitive control across self-referential and non-self-referential processes. The apparent lack of effect on the dorsal MPFC activity is consistent with the specific effects of antidepressants versus cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) previously demonstrated in depression. Future studies could examine the relationships between the dorsal MPFC activity in depressed patients and the need to reduce self-focus through CBT to achieve remission and prevent relapse.

Introduction

According to the cognitive theory of depression, depressed patients suffer from cognitive biases, such as increased attention to negative stimuli or to the self (i.e. self-focus) (Clark and Beck, 1999, Mor and Winquist, 2002). Depressive self-focus is characterized by its evaluative, analytical style (i.e. ‘thinking about’ experience), rather than being a direct, intuitive, experiential awareness of experience in the moment (Watkins and Teasdale, 2004). In healthy subjects, self-referential processing (i.e. the appraisal of stimuli as strongly related to one's own person) relies mainly on the cortical midline structures, including the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) (Fossati et al., 2003, Amodio and Frith, 2006). Because self-focus is qualitatively distinct in depression (Mor and Winquist, 2002, Watkins and Teasdale, 2004), one could hypothesize that depressed patients would activate a different set of brain regions during self-referential processing, compared to healthy controls. However, in contrast with the neural bases of the increased attention to negative stimuli, little is known about those of depressive self-focus.

Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies addressed this issue and found an aberrant activation of the MPFC in depressed patients (Grimm et al., 2009, Sheline et al., 2009, Lemogne et al., 2009). For instance, Lemogne et al. (2009) presented depressed patients and matched healthy controls with personality traits and asked them to judge whether each trait described them or not (‘self’ condition), or whether it described a generally desirable trait or not (‘general’ condition) (Lemogne et al., 2009). Although the MPFC was activated by both patients and controls in ‘self’ versus ‘general’ condition, the activation of the dorsal part of the MPFC in ‘self’ versus ‘general’ condition was unique to patients, as was the activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).

The aim of this pilot study was to examine whether this activation pattern was stable over the course of depression. Even in remitted patients, and especially in those who do not receive CBT, cognitive biases such as self-focus are pervasive (Segal et al., 2006, Bergouignan et al., 2008). Therefore, we hypothesized that the activation of the dorsal MPFC and/or the left DLPFC could persist even after several weeks of antidepressant treatment, irrespective of clinical improvement.

Section snippets

Subjects

The study encompassed 2 fMRI sessions. The second session was proposed to the last 16 subjects (8 depressed inpatients and 8 healthy controls) of our previous study (Lemogne et al., 2009). All subjects were native French-speaking, right-handed, and gave written informed consent. They were screened for DSM-IV diagnoses with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Sheehan et al., 1998). Severity of depression was assessed using the Montgomery and Asberg's Depression Rating Scale

Subjects

Eight depressed inpatients (8 women) and 8 healthy subjects (3 men, 5 women) were included (Table 1). All patients were taking antidepressants and performed the first session within the first week of receiving their treatment. At the first session, 4 patients were taking a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), 2 a serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), and 2 a tricyclic antidepressant. At the second session, SSRI had been switched for a SNRI for 1 patient and the treatment

Discussion

This pilot study aimed to examine the neural bases of self-referential processing over the course of depression. Results at session 1 have been discussed elsewhere (with the MPFC being referred to as ‘medial frontal gyrus’) (Lemogne et al., 2009). Briefly, activation of the MPFC during self-referential processing was common to patients and controls, but relative activation of the dorsal MPFC (BA9) and the DLPFC in ‘self’ versus ‘general’ condition was unique to patients. Activation of the

Role of funding source

C.L. is supported by le Fonds d'Etudes et de Recherche du Corps Médical des Hôpitaux de Paris and Lilly Institute. L.B. is supported by Institut National du Cancer. P.F. is supported by a NARSAD Young Investigator Award 2003. These funding sources had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Christine Delmaire and Guillaume le Bastard for assistance with fMRI scanning.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (104)

  • Familiar language in treatment-resistant depression: Effects of deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate

    2023, Journal of Neurolinguistics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite its recent emergence as an important theme, pragmatic language competence in depression has been relatively understudied, especially with respect to familiar language. More is known about semantics and syntax, where there are noted deficits in syntactic processing (Emery & Breslau, 1989), confrontation naming, defining concepts, repetition (da Silva Novaretti, D’Avila Freitas, Mansur, Nitrini, & Radanovic, 2011; Sexton et al., 2011), and negative word-use and self-referencing (Alison & Burgess, 2003; Bernard, Baddeley, Rodriguez, & Burke, 2015; Bucci & Freedman, 1981; Fossati et al., 2003; Hilimire et al., 2015; Lemogne et al., 2009, 2010; Molendijk et al., 2010; Rude, Gortner, & Pennebaker, 2004; Smirnova et al., 2018; Stirman & Pennebaker, 2001). The way language is used in social interaction is important to consider when determining whether interactions are typical or atypical (Krauss & Chiu, 1998, pp. 41–88) and should be studied further, particularly in clinical populations where negative social interaction is selectively affected, such as in schizophrenia (Titone, Holzman, & Levy, 2002).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text