Research reportMajor depressive episodes over the course of 7 years and hippocampal subfield volumes at 7 tesla MRI: The PREDICT-MR study
Introduction
Smaller hippocampal volumes are a common, but not a universal, finding in major depressive disorder (MDD) (Arnone et al., 2012, Du et al., 2012, McKinnon et al., 2009). The hippocampal formation is of importance in MDD for several reasons, as described in a recent review (MacQueen and Frodl 2011): 1) stressful life events are associated with the onset of MDD, but are also thought to be elicited by MDD (Kessler, 1997), and stress is also associated with smaller hippocampal volumes (Sapolsky et al., 1990, Sousa et al., 1999); 2) memory impairments that are dependent on hippocampal functioning, are often observed in MDD (Zakzanis et al., 1998); and 3) the hippocampal formation is part of a network that is often found to be disregulated in MDD (Frodl et al., 2008, Frodl et al., 2010, Zakzanis et al., 1998).
The hippocampal formation is not a homogeneous structure but consists of anatomically and functionally distinct subfields: the subiculum, cornu ammonis (CA) sections 1–4 and the dentate gyrus (Duvernoy et al., 2005). Tightly connected to the hippocampal formation lies the entorhinal cortex (Duvernoy et al., 2005). Because of their anatomical and functional differences, subfields of the hippocampal formation and the entorhinal cortex are likely to be differentially associated to aging and disease (Small et al., 2011). For instance, a recent review indicated that in MDD the subiculum is mainly reduced (Small et al., 2011), potentially because, according to animal studies, the subiculum has more cortisol binding sites (Reul and de Kloet, 1985) and receives a stronger serotonergic innervation from the raphe nucleus (Muller and Jacobs, 2010) compared to other subfields. Also the subiculum is connected to the basolateral nuclear group of the amygdala (Aggleton, 2000), which is also affected in MDD (Sheline et al., 1998). On the other hand post-mortem studies (Boldrini et al., 2009, Stockmeier et al., 2004) and stress research in animals (Sapolsky et al., 1990, Sousa et al., 1999) point to the involvement of CA3 and the dentate gyrus in MDD. However, it should be noted that these studies often did not include the subiculum in their analyses. Investigating whether hippocampal subfield volumes are differentially associated to MDD may provide insight in the neural substrate of MDD.
In recent years, the association between MDD and hippocampal subfield volumes has received increasing attention in MRI studies. The majority of these studies performed surface mapping (Ballmaier et al., 2008, Bearden et al., 2009, Cole et al., 2010, Gold et al., 2014, Posener et al., 2003, Sexton et al., 2012, Tae et al., 2011), a method in which inward deformations of the outer surface of the hippocampal formation are measured and reductions in subfield volumes are derived from these local deformations. Advantages of this method are that it can be performed at standard field strength (1.5 and 3 tesla (T) MRI) and that it is very sensitive to small changes. A limitation of this method is that the dentate gyrus, located within the hippocampal formation, cannot be assessed. Several of these studies reported inward deformations of the subiculum in patients with MDD compared to controls (Ballmaier et al., 2008, Bearden et al., 2009, Cole et al., 2010, Posener et al., 2003, Tae et al., 2011), but surface reductions in other subfields have also been reported (Ballmaier et al., 2008, Bearden et al., 2009, Cole et al., 2010, Tae et al., 2011). Fewer studies measured subfield volumes and/or entorhinal cortex volume (Gerritsen et al., 2011, Gold et al., 2010, Huang et al., 2013, Kook et al., 2012) and these studies reported inconsistent findings. These studies assessed volumes of hippocampal subfields at field strengths ranging from 1.5 to 4.7 T. Recent advances in ultra-high field imaging (e.g. 7 T MRI) have made it possible to visualize the hippocampal formation in great detail in three dimensions, with resolution and signal-to-noise ratio that is superior to lower field strength scanners. Recently, we developed a reliable protocol for the assessment of hippocampal subfield and entorhinal cortex volumes covering most of the longitudinal axis of the hippocampal formation using isotropic 0.7 mm 7 T MRI data (Wisse et al., 2012). In this study we will use this newly developed protocol to investigate the association of occurrence of major depressive episodes (MDEs), assessed five times over seven years, with hippocampal subfield and entorhinal cortex volumes at high field 7 T MRI.
Section snippets
Participants and design
Participants were included from the PREDICT-MR study, an ancillary study to the PREDICT-NL study (Stegenga et al., 2012a), with the aim to investigate risk factors and consequences of brain changes on MRI in general practice attendees with and without depression. The PREDICT-NL study is the Dutch part of the PredictD study (King et al., 2008), a multicenter prospective cohort study from which a multifactor algorithm was developed to predict risk of onset of MDD in primary care patients in six
Results
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the total study sample (n=47) and according to MDE diagnosis. Of the 47 persons, 13 had had an MDE in the previous seven years (1 episode n=8; 2 episodes n=2, 3 episodes n=1, 4 episodes n=1, 5 episodes n=1).
Participants were on average 60 (SD 10) years old and 38% were men. 13% of the study population used antidepressants at time of MRI, and the median score of depressive symptom severity as measured with the PHQ-9 at time of MRI was 4, and it was 3 when
Discussion
In this study of general practice attendees without cognitive impairment, we found that persons who had had one or more major depressive episodes in the 84 months preceding the MRI scan did not have significantly smaller total hippocampal than persons never depressed. Also, hippocampal subfield volumes or entorhinal cortex volumes were not significantly different in persons ever depressed compared to those never depressed. When we distinguished number of MDEs, an increasing number of MDEs was
Role of funding source
None of the funders had any role in study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript preparation or submission of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors reports a conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Grant from the Dutch Brain Foundation (Hersenstichting Nederland: Project no. 2012(1)-43). The research of MIG was supported by a VIDI Grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO: Project no. 917-66-311).
The authors are grateful to all participants for their time and effort and to the University Medical Center Utrecht Primary Care Network for participating. We would also like to thank all people involved in the data acquisition of the
References (47)
- et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging studies in unipolar depression: systematic review and meta-regression analyses
Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.
(2012) - et al.
Subregional hippocampal deformations in major depressive disorder
J. Affect. Disord.
(2010) - et al.
Voxelwise meta-analysis of gray matter reduction in major depressive disorder
Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry
(2012) - et al.
Functional connectivity bias of the orbitofrontal cortex in drug-free patients with major depression
Biol. Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Depression, hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis, and hippocampal and entorhinal cortex volumes—the SMART Medea study
Biol. Psychiatry
(2011) - et al.
Smaller cornu ammonis 2–3/dentate gyrus volumes and elevated cortisol in multiple sclerosis patients with depressive symptoms
Biol. Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Structural changes in hippocampal subfields in major depressive disorder: a high-field magnetic resonance imaging study
Biol. Psychiatry
(2013) - et al.
Hippocampal visuospatial function and volume in remitted depressed patients: an 8-year follow-up study
J. Affect. Disord.
(2010) - et al.
Reduced hippocampal volume in unmedicated, remitted patients with major depression versus control subjects
Biol. Psychiatry
(2005) - et al.
Ligand and subfield specificity of corticoid-induced neuronal loss in the rat hippocampal formation
Neuroscience
(1999)
Differential impact of risk factors for women and men on the risk of major depressive disorder
Ann. Epidemiol.
Cellular changes in the postmortem hippocampus in major depression
Biol. Psychiatry
Subfields of the hippocampal formation at 7 T MRI: in vivo volumetric assessment
Neuroimage
The Amygdala: A Functional Analysis
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV
Hippocampal morphology and distinguishing late-onset from early-onset elderly depression
Am. J. Psychiatry
Altered hippocampal morphology in unmedicated patients with major depressive illness
ASN Neuro
Antidepressants increase neural progenitor cells in the human hippocampus
Neuropsychopharmacology
Hippocampal volume reduction in major depression
Am. J. Psychiatry
Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast
Magn. Reson. Med.
The Human Hippocampus
Reduced gray matter brain volumes are associated with variants of the serotonin transporter gene in major depression
Mol. Psychiatry
Depressive symptoms, antidepressant use, and brain volumes on MRI in a population-based cohort of old persons without dementia
J. Alzheimer׳s. Dis.
Cited by (40)
Sub-regional hippocampal volumes in first-episode drug-naïve major depression disorder
2021, Neuroscience LettersHippocampal volume as treatment predictor in antidepressant naïve patients with major depressive disorder
2021, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :Several studies have reported lower volume in the left, right, or bilateral hippocampus of subjects with MDD patients, which might be due to confounding factors (i.e. subjects’ age, disease duration, and severity, recurrences, comorbidities, medications, or hippocampal borders in images) (Stratmann et al., 2014). Other studies examine the total or segmented HV on subjects treated for previous MDD episodes (Bremner et al., 2000; Wisse et al., 2015). Studies have found a significantly smaller left hippocampus than the controls.
Ultra-high field imaging in Major Depressive Disorder: a review of structural and functional studies
2021, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :Moreover, the authors showed that subjects with MDD had significantly smaller volumes in right and left hippocampus (Cho et al., 2010). In addition, a longitudinal sMRI study carried out over the course of 7 years on subjects with one or multiple MDE detected smaller subiculum volumes in individuals with multiple MDE compared to subjects with one MDE (Wisse et al., 2015). Then, an open-label trial with escitalopram followed by venlafaxine conducted in patients with acute MDD failed to detect treatment-related changes in the global hippocampal or its subfields volumes, but highlighted that remitting acute MDD patients presented lower baseline hippocampal formation volumes compared with non-remitting acute patients.
Neurobiological mechanisms underlying sex-related differences in stress-related disorders: Effects of neuroactive steroids on the hippocampus
2019, Frontiers in NeuroendocrinologyThe Impact of Stress and Major Depressive Disorder on Hippocampal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Morphology
2019, Biological Psychiatry