Invited reviewFacial affect processing in social anxiety: Tasks and stimuli
Research highlights
▶ Social anxiety is associated with abnormal processing of facial emotion. ▶ Emotional processing biases in SA are mostly related to negative emotions. ▶ Studies in the area use a wide variety of tasks, stimuli, and recruitment procedures. ▶ Despite methodological differences, findings are convergent.
Introduction
The latest years have witnessed a steady growth in the number of publications related to social anxiety (SA) in general and to its pathological manifestation, social phobia (SP) or social anxiety disorder (SAD). One reason that could account for this is the greatest comprehension of the condition by doctors and sufferers fostered by recent behavioral, neuroimaging, and psychopharmacological evidence. This development has shed light over pathological manifestations that were long thought of as personality traits that required no specific treatment.
The core feature of SA is the fear of being negatively evaluated by others. According to the DSM-IV, the pathological manifestation of SA can be divided into two forms according to the number of social or performance situations that generate anxiety: generalized SP and specific (or circumscribed) SP. The generalized form of the disorder is frequently a chronic, disabling condition (Davidson et al., 1993) marked by the phobic avoidance of most interaction situations and leading to social, educational, professional and personal impairment (Schneier et al., 1994). The specific subtype of the disorder is characterized by the fear or avoidance of a single situation (e.g., speaking in public) and is normally less disabling than the generalized subtype.
In addition to the problems brought about by the condition itself (interpersonal relationships, academic and professional performance, etc.), individuals suffering from SP tend to have comorbid conditions that not seldom constitute the main complaint when these people seek for help (Mathew et al., 2001). The most common comorbid conditions in SP are depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and alcohol and drug abuse, the latter believed to occur as self-medication attempts.
Since SA is rooted in the fear of negative evaluation by others, social cues in the environment are the best candidates for processing biases by affected individuals (Foa et al., 2000). Among such social cues, the human face is prominent due to its capacity to convey a number of different emotional contexts, functioning as the “traffic signs” of social interaction.
The cognitive ability to adequately decode information from human faces has been investigated in the context of many psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia, autism, depression, GAD, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The first studies on the processing of facial information by people with SA date back to the mid 1990s and have increased in number and variety on a yearly basis since then.
There is evidence that people with SA tend to avoid eye-to-eye contact (Marks et al., 1969, Öhman, 1986, Greist, 1995). According to Horley and colleagues (2003), this could be an indicator of “exacerbated social sensitivity”. Visual scanpath studies have provided objective data concerning the way that affected people interact with pictures of emotional faces and other emotional stimuli (Horley et al., 2004). While GAD patients present a conventional pattern to scan pictures with potential social threat (Freeman et al., 2000), SP patients display a pattern that has been called hypervigilance/avoidance. According to this pattern, SP patients present a first stage characterized by enhanced attention to negative displays of emotion, such as disgusted and angry faces (Sousa et al., 2006), followed by avoidance of the aversive stimuli (Horley et al., 2003).
Studies involving healthy volunteers have shown that angry faces are more quickly detected among neutral faces than a friendly expression (happy face) presented in the same conditions (Ohman et al., 2001). However, SP patients appear to be even quicker in detecting angry faces than healthy controls (Aronoff et al., 1988).
Different theoretical models try to elucidate the emotional processing alterations in SP. Clark and Wells (1995), for instance, suggest that people with SP confronted with the feared situations tend to direct attention toward themselves, disregarding emotional information available in the environment. Conversely, other cognitive models state that people with SP allocate greater attentional resources to threatening information (Mogg and Bradley, 1998, Mathews and Mackintosh, 1998).
Although most studies support the notion of a negative interpretative bias in SA, some authors and groups failed to find any differences between people with SA and healthy controls in regard to the processing of facial information. D’Argembeau and colleagues (2003), investigating the influence of emotion in the memory for facial identity and expression in people with high and low social anxiety, found no evidence to support that SA is related to processing biases for negative or positive faces. Another group (Juth et al., 2005) found evidence supporting that the purported differences between socially anxious individuals and healthy controls only emerge in the presence of a social stressor, such as the necessity to deliver a speech after the task. Also, Philippot and Douilliez (2005) failed to find differences between patients with generalized SP and healthy controls in the labeling of emotions and judgment of emotional intensity of facial stimuli.
The importance of comprehending the pathogenesis of SA and SP in an effort to overcome the impact of these conditions on the life of affected people is the thread that links all studies related to the topic. It was with the purpose of gathering the knowledge available in the field and indicating possible elements that could account for discrepant findings that this review was designed. Thus, the following pages will attempt to provide the reader with an up-to-date panorama of the study on facial emotion processing in SA and SP, highlighting the specificities of the tasks and stimuli used and their possible influence in the conclusions of the different studies performed in the area to date.
Section snippets
Article search and selection
In order to review the scientific literature on facial emotion processing in SA, we performed a search on the Medline, PubMed, SciElo, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycInfo online databases. The search terms used were social phobia, social anxiety disorder, face, facial, emotion, and expression.
We included articles published in English, Portuguese, and Spanish describing research involving samples of socially anxious individuals and facial emotion processing tasks. Investigations with non-human
Samples
Out of 40 studies, 23 (≈60%) involved samples of university students, 12 (30%) enrolled patients seeking for or attending treatment services, and 5 (≈10%) recruited participants by advertisement.
According to the different sample characterization/diagnostic instruments used in the studies, 913 participants were defined as being socially anxious, 242 had a diagnosis of generalized SP, 176 were described as having SP or SAD, with no detailed description about subtypes. In addition to these, 122
Discussion
The analysis of the research articles included in this review shows that, despite the existence of evidence in the opposite direction (D’Argembeau et al., 2003, Juth et al., 2005, Philippot and Douilliez, 2005, de Jong and Martens, 2007), SA is characterized by the biased processing of facial expressions of emotion. This bias is manifested in different cognitive domains such as memory, attention, visual scanpath, and emotion recognition, the latter belonging to a sub-division of cognitive
Conclusions
The systematic review of 40 research articles published in the last 14 years showed that socially anxious individuals do not interpret facial expressions of emotion in the same way as healthy controls do. The emotional valence of facial displays is one factor to be considered in SA, given that the processing of facial emotions in this condition seems to be permeated by biases related to negative emotions, such as sadness, anger, fear, and disgust, although recent evidence extends this bias to
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Role of the funding source
J.P. Machado-de-Sousa, K.C. Arrais and C. Meneses-Gaya are recipients of grants from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil). J.A. Crippa and J.E.C. Hallak are recipients of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) productivity awards. This research was supported in part by a Fundação de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistência do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo
References (63)
- et al.
Social anxiety disorder women easily recognize fearful, sad and happy faces: the influence of gender
Journal of Psychiatric Research
(2010) - et al.
Patients with generalized social phobia direct their attention away from faces
Behavior Research and Therapy
(2002) - et al.
Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobia: a replication and extension
Behavior Research and Therapy
(2005) - et al.
Identity and expression memory for happy and angry faces in social anxiety
Acta Psychologica
(2003) - et al.
Detection of emotional expressions in rapidly changing facial displays in high- and low-socially anxious women
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2007) - et al.
Memory bias in generalized social phobia: remembering negative emotional expressions
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2000) - et al.
Neuroimaging in social anxiety disorder: a systematic review of the literature
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Impaired identification of fearful faces in Generalised Social Phobia
Journal of Affective Disorders
(2009) - et al.
Social phobics do not see eye to eye: a visual scanpath study of emotional expression processing
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2003) - et al.
Interpreting facial expressions: the influence of social anxiety, emotional valence, and race
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
(2009)
Psychophysiological correlates of face processing in social phobia
Brain Research
Social anxiety and evaluation of social crowds: explicit and implicit measures
Behavior Research and Therapy
Attentional biases in social anxiety: an investigation using the inattentional blindness paradigm
Behavior Research and Therapy
Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobics
Behavior Research and Therapy
Internal versus external attention in social anxiety: an investigation using a novel paradigm
Behavior Research and Therapy
Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety
Behavior Research and Therapy
A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Jumping to interpretations: social anxiety disorder and the identification of emotional facial expressions
Behavior Research Therapy
Memory for facial expressions in social phobia
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Social phobics do not misinterpret facial expression of emotion
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Detection of negative and positive audience behaviours by socially anxious subjects
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety? An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Social anxiety, fear of negative evaluation and detection of negative emotion in others
Behavior Research and Therapy
The effect of a single-session attention modification program on response to a public-speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
The recognition of threatening facial stimuli
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Happy but not so approachable: the social judgments of individuals with generalized social phobia
Depression and Anxiety
A cognitive model of social phobia
Interpretation of facial expressions and social anxiety: specificity and source of biases
Cognition & Emotion
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in social phobia: preliminary findings
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L)
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders—patient edition
Cited by (62)
Influence of affective verbal context on emotional facial expression perception of social anxiety
2022, International Journal of PsychophysiologyCitation Excerpt :Facial expression is an important social clue to convey information in interpersonal communication. Behavioral and neuroimaging studies have shown the abnormal patterns in the processing of facial expression of individuals with social anxiety (Binelli et al., 2014; Claudino et al., 2019; Machado-de-Sousa et al., 2010; Staugaard, 2010). For example, eye tracking studies showed individuals with social anxiety exhibited hypervigilance-avoidance in response to threatening faces (Claudino et al., 2019), which means, there is first hypervigilance regarding threatening faces, followed by avoidance of such stimuli.
Targeting separate specific learning parameters underlying cognitive behavioral therapy can improve perceptual judgments of anger
2019, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryAssociations between feelings of social anxiety and emotion perception
2018, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Despite its strengths, few studies have applied SDT as an analysis tool in anxiety research (see summaries by Frenkel, Lamy, Algom, & Bar-Haim, 2009; Yoon, Yang, Chong, & Oh, 2014). Overall, however, reviews tend to support an interpretive bias in social anxiety (Machado-de-Sousa et al., 2010; Staugaard, 2010; but see, e.g., Schofield, Coles, & Gibb, 2007; Stevens, Gerlach, & Rist, 2008 for contrary findings). Relative to controls, highly socially anxious people encode, respond to, and recall situations as more threatening than they are.
Large-scale brain functional network abnormalities in social anxiety disorder
2023, Psychological Medicine