Hippocampal volume changes in healthy subjects at risk of unipolar depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.12.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Unipolar depression is moderately heritable. It is unclear whether structural brain changes associated with unipolar depression are present in healthy persons at risk of the disorder. Here we investigated whether a genetic predisposition to unipolar depression is associated with structural brain changes. A priori, hippocampal volume reductions were hypothesized. Using a high-risk study design, magnetic resonance imaging brain scans were obtained from 59 healthy high-risk subjects having a co-twin with unipolar depression, and 53 healthy low-risk subjects without a first-degree family history of major psychiatric disorder. High-risk twins had smaller hippocampal volumes than low-risk twins (p < 0.04). The finding was most pronounced in DZ twins. Groups did not differ on global brain tissue volumes or regional tissue volumes assessed in exploratory voxel-wise whole cerebrum analyses. In conclusion, hippocampal volume reduction may index a predisposition to develop depression and thus may be predictive of future onset of the disorder. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of (shared) environmental and genetic factors.

Introduction

Unipolar depression is heritable with concordance rates from 0.23 to 0.67 for monozygotic (MZ) twins and from 0.14 to 0.43 for dizygotic (DZ) twins (Sullivan et al., 2000). Structural brain imaging studies in unipolar depression have reported increased prevalence of white matter hyperintensities and volume decreases/changes in hippocampus, amygdala, caudate, putamen and frontal cortex (for reviews see Sheline, 2003, Lorenzetti et al., 2009, Koolschijn et al., 2009). The presence of hippocampal volume reduction in patients with unipolar depression is underscored in recent meta-analyses (Videbech and Ravnkilde, 2004, Koolschijn et al., 2009). Familial major depressive disorder has been associated with subgenual frontal volume reduction (Drevets et al., 1997). Moreover, a recent study of young psychotropic-naive patients with familial major depressive disorder, showed that the 22 included patients had significantly smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than the 35 matched controls (MacMaster et al., 2008). It is at present unclear whether structural brain changes associated with unipolar depression can also be observed in healthy persons at risk of the disorder.

In the present study we examined healthy individuals who never experienced depressive episodes to look for neuroanatomical correlates of a genetic predisposition to unipolar depressive disorder. Identification of high and low-risk individuals was accomplished by linking records of the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register and the Danish Twin Registry. High resolution magnetic resonance (MR) scans of the brain were obtained in healthy MZ and DZ twins with a co-twin diagnosed with unipolar depression, and healthy MZ and DZ twins with a co-twin never diagnosed with an affective disorder. That is, the present study is a high-risk study, not a “classical” twin study, as it was not possible to investigate the (ill) co-twins. A priori we hypothesized that high-risk twins would have smaller hippocampal volumes than low-risk twins. Additionally, we performed exploratory voxel-wise whole cerebrum analyses.

Section snippets

Participants

In the present study 112 participants were included (Table 1): 59 healthy twins at risk of unipolar depression (high-risk – HR – twins) and 53 healthy twins without known personal or co-twin history of hospital contact with affective disorder (low-risk – LR – twins). The healthy high-risk and low-risk twins were identified through record linkage between the Danish Twin Registry, the Danish Psychiatric Research Register and the Danish Civil Register (the registers are described in more detail in

Demographics and clinical data

Groups did not differ on sex, zygosity, height, weight, or handedness (Table 1). However, groups did differ significantly in age and education, with the high-risk twins being somewhat older and having received less years of education. The education effect remained significant after controlling for age.

High-risk twins scored significantly higher on the HAM-D and number of adverse life events in the past 12 months than low-risk twins. Moreover, there was a trend for high-risk twins to score higher

Discussion

Consistent with our hypothesis, after correcting for supratentorial ICV, age, sex, and education, healthy high-risk subjects had smaller hippocampal volumes than healthy low-risk subjects. This effect remained significant after controlling for possible non-linear age effects, group differences on years of education, HAM-D scores and number of adverse life events in the past 12 months. However, excluding subjects with minor depression/anxiety related disorders reduced the Risk effect to trend

Contributors

Lars Vedel Kessing and Maj Vinberg designed the overall study and wrote the protocol. William F.C. Baaré, Terry L. Jernigan, Gitte M. Knudsen and Olaf B. Paulson designed the MR acquisition as well as image analysis part of the study. William F.C. Baaré and Annika R. Langkilde performed the MR image analyses. William F.C. Baaré and Maj Vinberg performed the literature searches and statistical analyses and wrote the first draft of the article. All authors contributed to and have approved the

Role of funding source

The Lundbeck Foundation provided most of the funding for the study. Additional funding came from the Foundation of A.P. Moeller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Moeller, the Foundation of Eli Larsen and Egon Larsen, and the Foundation of Einar Geert-Joergensen and wife Ellen Geert-Joergensen. The funding sources had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants. The Lundbeck Foundation provided most of the funding for the study. Additional funding came from the Foundation of A.P. Moeller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Moeller, the Foundation of Eli Larsen and Egon Larsen, and the Foundation of Einar Geert-Joergensen and wife Ellen Geert-Joergensen. Thanks to the Department of Psychiatric Demography, University of Aarhus, Psychiatric Hospital, Riskov, Denmark, and to the Danish Twin Registry for cooperation in the study.

References (46)

  • L.V. Kessing

    Validity of diagnoses and other clinical register data in patients with affective disorder

    European Psychiatry

    (1998)
  • K.T. Kronmuller et al.

    Hippocampal volume in first episode and recurrent depression

    Psychiatry Research

    (2009)
  • V. Lorenzetti et al.

    Structural brain abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a selective review of recent MRI studies

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2009)
  • F.P. MacMaster et al.

    Amygdala and hippocampal volumes in familial early onset major depressive disorder

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • J. Savitz et al.

    Bipolar and major depressive disorder: neuroimaging the developmental-degenerative divide

    Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

    (2009)
  • Y.I. Sheline

    Neuroimaging studies of mood disorder effects on the brain

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • M.A. Yassa et al.

    A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1988)
  • L. Christiansen et al.

    Age- and sex-differences in the validity of questionnaire-based zygosity in twins

    Twin Research

    (2003)
  • M.B. Cuadra et al.

    Comparison and validation of tissue modelization and statistical classification methods in T1-weighted MR brain images

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

    (2005)
  • W.C. Drevets et al.

    Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders

    Nature

    (1997)
  • Ebdrup BH, Glenthoj BY, Rasmussen H, Aggernaes B, Langkilde AM, Paulson OB, et al. Hippocampal and caudate volume...
  • Cited by (69)

    • Altered Dentate Gyrus Microstructure in Individuals at High Familial Risk for Depression Predicts Future Symptoms

      2021, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other studies have found smaller hippocampal volumes in (unaffected) high-risk adults and children (42–46). Healthy twin siblings of persons with depression also had smaller hippocampal volumes than twin siblings of persons without depression (82). However, some familial risk studies found no changes (47–49).

    • The role of genes and environment on brain alterations in Major Depressive Disorder: A review of twin studies: Special Section on “Translational and Neuroscience Studies in Affective Disorders”. Section Editor, Maria Nobile MD, PhD. This Section of JAD focuses on the relevance of translational and neuroscience studies in providing a better understanding of the neural basis of affective disorders. The main aim is to briefly summaries relevant research findings in clinical neuroscience with particular regards to specific innovative topics in mood and anxiety disorders

      2018, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      GM reduction, however, resulted exclusively in the intra-pair comparison of MZ twins discordant for MDD, suggesting the possibility of a specific environmental contribution to hippocampal alterations linked to depression. Finally, Baaré et al. (2010) replicated these findings by showing that high-risk twins had smaller hippocampal volumes compared to low-risk twins, on a sample composed by both MZ and DZ twins. However, the authors suggested that the volume reduction seemed to be more pronounced in DZ twins, underlining a more complex gene-by-environment interaction, probably affected by shared environment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text