ReviewTheory of mind—evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology
Introduction
The term ‘theory of mind’ was originally proposed by primatologists Premack and Woodruff in a seminal article to suggest that chimpanzees may be capable of inferring mental states of their con-specifics (individuals of the same species) (Premack and Woodruff, 1978). Later on, the term was adopted by child psychologists to describe the ontogenetic development of mental perspective taking in infants and young children (e.g. Leslie, 1987). In terms of psychopathology, the concept of a disturbed theory of mind has become increasingly influential to explain behavioral symptoms in children with autistic spectrum disorders (Baron-Cohen et al., 1985). It is now widely acknowledged and well buttressed by numerous empirical studies that autistic children and adults with Asperger's syndrome, a mild form of autism, have profound difficulties in appreciating the mental states of other individuals (e.g. Baron-Cohen, 1988, 1991; Baron-Cohen et al., 1997, 2001a; Buitelaar et al., 1999). Such deficits in mental state comprehension have been shown to be selective, that is, other cognitive capacities or ‘non-social’ intelligence may well be preserved in people with autism (Baron-Cohen et al., 1986; Baron-Cohen, 1991). The situation with other psychopathological conditions and psychiatric disorders is less clear. There is, however, growing evidence that impaired theory of mind may also lie at the core of certain psychotic symptoms in ‘endogenous’ psychoses and behavioral deviations found in heterogeneous disorders affecting frontal lobe functioning—from psychopathy to frontotemporal dementia.
Although somewhat speculative, it is conceivable that the strong desire inherent to human nature to attribute agency—we sometimes even ascribe intentions to inanimate objects—renders the cognitive faculty of theory of mind vulnerable to dysfunction. In other words, if theory of mind, as suggested here, is so central to human life, any functional impairment or structural disruption of the underlying neural substrates of this recently evolved cognitive capacity could be detrimental to social functioning.
In this article, we seek to review the evolutionary background, the ontogenetic development and the evidence for selective disorders of theory of mind in psychopathological conditions. Before doing so, we want to emphasize that theory of mind only represents one particular aspect of what has been labeled ‘social cognition’ (Brothers, 1990; Adolphs, 2001). The perception of social signals, motivation, emotion, attention, memory and decision-making equally contribute to the actual behavioral output in social interaction. As Adolphs (2001) has pointed out, the components and boundaries of social cognition are to a great deal ill defined. For the sake of clarity and space, we consider it necessary to narrow the view on theory of mind—acknowledging that in ‘real-life’ situations theory of mind is entrenched in a neural network that constitutes the ‘social brain’ of human and non-human primates (Dunbar, 2003).
Section snippets
Theory of mind—adaptation to social complexity?
In 1966 and 1976, respectively, Jolly and Humphrey argued independently of each other that primates have excess cognitive capacities beyond the needs for everyday feeding and ranging. They suggested that it has been the social environment that primarily put evolutionary pressure on brain development in primates (Jolly, 1966; Humphrey, 1976). Indeed, primates are essentially gregarious animals, and group living certainly confers adaptive advantages on the individual such as better protection
Ontogeny of theory of mind
At birth, human infants are essentially immature. The growth of the human brain extends well into the postnatal period. At the cellular level, synaptic pruning and myelination even takes place until after puberty and adolescence (De Bellis et al., 2001; Levitt, 2003).
In principle, the ontogeny of the theory of mind faculty does not so much differ from the maturation of other brain functions—just as an infant is not capable of jumping before sitting, standing and walking, the ability of
CNS-representation of theory of mind
If primate brains, particularly neocortical structures, enlarged over evolutionary time due to selection pressures from the social environment, where exactly is theory of mind located in the human brain? Evidence comes from various sources. Comparative neuroanatomy and neurophysiology informs us which brain areas and corresponding functions came under selection pressure in non-human primates to evolve into the neural correlates of theory of mind in modern humans. In addition, functional brain
Testing theory of mind
The ‘gold standard test’ of comprehending other persons' minds is to grasp that others can hold false beliefs that are different from one's own (correct) knowledge (Dennett, 1978). The classic ‘Sally-and-Anne-Test’ (Wimmer and Perner, 1983) experimentally creates a situation in which a test person has to distinguish his or her own knowledge that an object has been hidden by one character (Anne) in the absence of another person (Sally) from the knowledge of the other characters involved. The
Psychopathology of theory of mind
The concept of theory of mind is appealing to clinical psychopathologists, because theory of mind in its most sophisticated expression is unique to humans and because its absence or impaired functioning may account for quite a broad spectrum of behavioral abnormalities in both children and adults. In the following section, we therefore briefly summarize some of the empirical findings regarding theory of mind in psychopathological conditions.
Developmental disorders
In this paragraph, we put emphasis on those studies addressing the issue of impaired theory of mind acquisition during child development. The starting point of empirical research into this matter was Baron-Cohen (1988) intriguing question whether the autistic child has a ‘theory of mind’. Since, Kanner's (1943) and Asperger's (1944) groundbreaking publications clinicians have sought to explain why autistic children would behave so socially withdrawn and unempathically the way they actually do.
Personality disorders and other non-psychotic disorders
Empirical research on theory of mind in personality disorders has largely focused on what has been conceptualized as ‘psychopathy’. Psychopaths have been characterized as superficially charming, but otherwise unreliable, ‘cold-hearted’ and unresponsive individuals. These emotional deficits have been found to be present in psychopaths from childhood on. It has therefore been argued that psychopathic individuals who are impaired in empathizing with others could have impaired theory of mind
Schizophrenia and affective disorders
Schizophrenia and affective disorders, commonly subsumed under the obsolete term ‘functional psychoses’ usually manifest in adolescence or adulthood. In contrast to theory of mind, deficits that emerge due to gross brain pathology (see below) or primarily due to developmental or personality disorders, schizophrenia and affective disorders have an intermediate position—we simply do not know whether theory of mind has developed normally in individuals suffering from ‘functional psychoses’.
Frith
Brain damage and degenerative brain disorders
Assessing theory of mind in patients suffering from brain lesions following stroke, brain tumor operation or degenerative disorders differs from the studies outlined above, because it can be taken for granted that theory of mind developed normally in these individuals.
A number of studies on theory of mind in patients with brain damage to the frontal lobes following cerebral artery infarction or following tumor excision have demonstrated that patients with right frontal lesions are impaired in a
Discussion
In this article, we have sought to examine a specific aspect of social cognition in an evolutionary perspective. The ability to infer mental states of other individuals, referred to as ‘theory of mind’ probably emerged in primates due to selection pressures from the social environment (Brothers, 1990). Tracing back the evolutionary history of this cognitive faculty, we found evidence that theory of mind most likely evolved from the capacity to monitor biological motion and from imitation
References (158)
A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind
Brain Res. Rev.
(2003)- et al.
‘Theory of mind’ in violent and nonviolent patients with paranoid schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2004) The neurobiology of social cognition
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2001)- et al.
Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?
Cognition
(1985) Emotion recognition, ‘theory of mind’ and social behavior in schizophrenia
Psychiatr. Res.
(2005)- et al.
Proverb comprehension reconsidered - ’theory of mind’ and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(2005) - et al.
A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task
NeuroImage
(2000) - et al.
Abnormalities of brain function during a nonverbal theory of mind task in schizophrenia
Neuropsychologia
(2003) - et al.
Reading the mind from eye gaze
Neuropsychologia
(2002) - et al.
Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: Investigating ‘theory of mind’ in people with schizophrenia
Schizophr. Res.
(1995)
The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task
Cognition
Social norms and human cooperation
Trends Cogn. Sci.
What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind?
NeuroImage
Ohter minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension
Cognition
Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks
Neuropsychologia
Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’
TICS
Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading
TICS
Theory of mind in schizophrenia: First person vs third person perspective
Conscious. Cogn.
Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study
NeuroImage
Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion
Neuron
Acquired ‘theory of mind’ impairments following stroke
Cognition
Deficiency of theory of mind in patients with remitted mood disorder
J. Affect. Disord.
Social pressures have selected for an extended juvenile period in primates
J. Hum. Evol.
Theory of mind in bipolar affective disorder
J. Affect. Disord.
Mentalising, schizotypy, and schizophrenia
Cognition
Young children's understanding of a false utterance
Dev. Psychol.
The expensive tissue hypothesis
Curr. Anthropol.
The Biology of Moral Systems
Die “autistischen Psychopathen“ im Kindesalter
Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkrankh.
Belief-desire reasoning among Baka children: Evidence for a universal conception of mind
Child. Dev.
The evolution of cooperation
Science
Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?
J. Autism Dev. Disord.
The theory of mind deficit in autism: How specific is it?
Br J. Dev. Psychol.
Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind
Mechanical, behavioural and intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children
Br. J. Dev. Psychol.
Another advanced test of theory of mind: evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome
J. Child. Psychol. Psychiatr.
Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism
J. Autism Dev. Disord.
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism
J. Child Psychol. Psychiatr.
Studies of theory of mind: Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent?
J. Dev. Learn. Dis.
The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on ‘theory of mind’ and cognition
Brain
Theory of mind in the psychopath
J. Forens. Psychiatr.
Evidence for theory of mind deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder
Acta Psychiatr. Scand.
Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence
Soc. Dev.
Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks
Autism
The social brain: A project for integrating primate behavior and neurophysiology in a new domain
Concepts Neurosci.
‘Theory of mind’ in schizophrenia: A review of the literature
Schizophr. Bull.
Theory of mind and emotion-recognition functioning in autistic spectrum disorders and in psychiatric control and normal children
Dev. Psychopath.
The Thinking Ape
Tracing the evolutionary path of cognition
Visualizing how one brain understands another: A PET study of theory of mind
Am. J. Psychiatry
Cited by (368)
To tell the truth or not: What effortful control, false belief, and sympathy tell us about preschoolers’ instrumental lies
2024, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyThe Human Affectome
2024, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsEvolution of a theory of mind
2024, iScienceThe science of justice: The neuropsychology of social punishment
2024, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsWhat contributes to false belief understanding in childhood? A multidimensional approach
2023, Cognitive DevelopmentThe acute effects of alcohol on social cognition: A systematic review of experimental studies
2023, Drug and Alcohol Dependence