Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 53, Issue 4, December 2010, Pages 1244-1255
NeuroImage

Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Imaging studies of cerebral volumes often adjust for factors such as age that may confound between-subject comparisons. However the use of nuisance covariates in imaging studies is inconsistent, which can make interpreting results across studies difficult. Using magnetic resonance images of 78 healthy controls we assessed the effects of age, gender, head size and scanner upgrade on region of interest (ROI) volumetry, cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometric (VBM) measures. We found numerous significant associations between these variables and volumetric measures: cerebral volumes and cortical thicknesses decreased with increasing age, men had larger volumes and smaller thicknesses than women, and increasing head size was associated with larger volumes. The relationships between most ROIs and head size volumes were non-linear. With age, gender, head size and upgrade in one model we found that volumes and thicknesses decreased with increasing age, women had larger volumes than men (VBM, whole-brain and white matter volumes), increasing head size was associated with larger volumes but not cortical thickness, and scanner upgrade had an effect on thickness and some volume measures. The effects of gender on cortical thickness when adjusting for head size, age and upgrade showed some non-significant effect (women > men), whereas the independent effect of head size showed little pattern. We conclude that age and head size should be considered in ROI volume studies, age, gender and upgrade should be considered for cortical thickness studies and all variables require consideration for VBM analyses. Division of all volumes by head size is unlikely to be adequate owing to their non-proportional relationship.

Research highlights

► Brain volume correlates with head size (TIV) and differs between the sexes. ► Increasing age has a negative association with brain volumes and cortical thickness. ► This can confound observational studies or reduce statistical power. ► For cortical thickness, we recommend adjustment for age, and gender. ► For some volumes and for voxel-based morphometry, we recommend age, gender and TIV.

Introduction

Cerebral atrophy is a characteristic and often defining feature of a number of degenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Chan et al., 2003, Jack et al., 2004), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) (Chan et al., 2001a, Whitwell et al., 2008) and Huntington's disease (HD) (Henley et al., 2009, Tabrizi et al., 2009). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to investigate these diseases (Barnes et al., 2007, Bohanna et al., 2008, Rovira & Leon, 2008) and imaging forms part of recommended investigations in dementia (Knopman et al., 2001, Waldemar et al., 2007) not only to exclude causes of symptoms, but also to determine characteristic patterns of atrophy associated with particular diagnoses (Dubois et al., 2007, McKeith et al., 1996, Neary et al., 1998).

Progressive improvements in MRI contrast and resolution mean that increasingly detailed measurements of regional or cortical volumes, thicknesses, surface areas and curvatures of structures or classes of tissue are now possible. There is increasing interest in using such measurements in randomized clinical trials to determine efficacy of putative disease-modifying treatments, as well as in observational case–control studies. Comparability of treatment groups in the former is assured (at least in large trials) by randomization. In contrast, in observational case–control studies, upon which we focus in this paper, subject groups (defined by disease status) often differ according to confounders that affect the outcome of interest, rendering simple group comparisons biased. One approach for dealing with such confounding is to match cases and controls for the confounding variables. A second approach is to collect information on confounding factors, and adjust for these, usually by including them as covariates in a statistical regression model. In addition to considerations of bias, adjusting for a predictive covariate increases the power of between-subject comparisons.

In observational MRI studies, age, gender and head size are the most commonly included so-called ‘nuisance’ variables. However, studies vary as to which of these variables are allowed for. Such differences in covariate selection may be reasonable, however, since whether a variable confounds comparisons between groups depends both on whether the variable affects the particular outcome under study and also whether the variable is balanced between subject groups. A balanced variable is not necessarily one which shows no significant differences across groups since non-statistically significant differences in smaller studies may still lead to confounded results.

A number of studies have shown that age is associated with lower whole-brain (Courchesne et al., 2000, Gur et al., 1991, Scahill et al., 2003), temporal lobe and hippocampal volumes (Scahill et al., 2003), grey matter volume (Courchesne et al., 2000, Ge et al., 2002, Good et al., 2001, Guttmann et al., 1998, Pell et al., 2008, Raz et al., 1997, Smith et al., 2007, Taki et al., 2004), and cortical thickness (Sowell et al., 2007). Effects of age on white matter are more varied: some studies have shown no significant effect (Good et al., 2001, Smith et al., 2007, Taki et al., 2004), whilst others show an increase until middle age followed by a decline (Courchesne et al., 2000, Ge et al., 2002) whilst others again show decline with age (Guttmann et al., 1998, Lemaitre et al., 2005). Two studies which show no overall significant effect of age on white matter volume do show some areas of white matter volume decline with age using voxel-based techniques (Good et al., 2001, Taki et al., 2004).

Male gender has been shown to be associated with larger cerebral volumes (Gur et al., 1991, Sowell et al., 2007) which disappears with head size correction (Scahill et al., 2003). Greater decline of grey matter volume with age in males has also been reported in some (Ge et al., 2002, Raz et al., 1997, Taki et al., 2004) but not other (Lemaitre et al., 2005) studies. Females have also been shown to have thicker cortex across many regions of the brain (Luders et al., 2006, Sowell et al., 2007).

Although measurement of age and gender when used are obvious, head size measures vary widely (Pengas et al., 2009) and some studies have used body height as a proxy (Raz et al., 1997, Sowell et al., 2007). Most commonly, an estimate of intracranial volume is used but there is a wide range of methods including tissue compartment addition (grey matter plus white matter plus cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) (Courchesne et al., 2000, Lemaitre et al., 2005, Rudick et al., 1999, Smith et al., 2007); registration-based estimation (Smith et al., 2002) estimates generated from points making an ellipsoid (Pfefferbaum et al., 2000), area of mid-sagittal slice section (Raz et al., 1997), and semi-automatic segmentation of every tenth slice (Scahill et al., 2003). In addition there are many ways in which head size correction is applied including: simple division of volumes (Chan et al., 2001b), regression association correction (Scahill et al., 2003) and statistical adjustment with the nuisance variable as a covariate (Good et al., 2002).

Using the same images from a set of normal control subjects, we aimed to assess which nuisance variables are associated with specific metrics often used in imaging studies: region of interest (ROI) volumes, cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Our hypothesis was that these variables would have large associations with cerebral structures and tissue compartments but we did not want to assume that the nature of these associations would be identical across structures. We aimed to quantify the independent contribution of each of the nuisance variables in explaining differences in volumes and cortical thicknesses between subjects, from which we could make recommendations as to which require consideration in observational studies.

Section snippets

Subjects

All individuals had been recruited as normal control subjects for research projects at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. These projects included longitudinal studies on sporadic AD (Schott et al., 2005), familial AD (Ridha et al., 2006), FTLD (Rohrer et al., 2008), HD (Henley et al., 2006, Henley et al., 2009), and progressive supranuclear palsy (Paviour et al., 2006) together with a cross-sectional magnetization transfer ratio imaging study in AD (Ridha et al.,

Results

In total 78 subjects were included in this study and the demographic data for these subjects are reported in Table 1.

Discussion

We have investigated the associations of age, gender and TIV with volumetric measures and cortical thickness using MRI. Unsurprisingly, each covariate alone had an effect on nearly every metric we assessed: age had a negative association with volumes and thicknesses, men had larger volumes and smaller cortical thicknesses than women and TIV had positive association with volumes and a non-significant negative association with thicknesses. However, within the same model, some variables showed

Acknowledgments

This work was undertaken at UCLH/UCL who received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. The Dementia Research Centre is an Alzheimer's Research Trust Co-ordinating Centre. Dr. Barnes is supported by the Alzheimer's Research Trust (UK). Professor Fox is supported by the Medical Research Council and NIHR (UK). Ms. Lehmann is supported by the Alzheimer's Society (UK). Dr. Clarkson is supported by the Technology Strategy Board

References (52)

  • C.R. Genovese et al.

    Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • C.D. Good et al.

    A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains

    Neuroimage

    (2001)
  • C.D. Good et al.

    Automatic differentiation of anatomical patterns in the human brain: validation with studies of degenerative dementias

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • H. Lemaitre et al.

    Age- and sex-related effects on the neuroanatomy of healthy elderly

    Neuroimage

    (2005)
  • G.S. Pell et al.

    Selection of the control group for VBM analysis: influence of covariates, matching and sample size

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • A. Pfefferbaum et al.

    Brain structure in men remains highly heritable in the seventh and eighth decades of life

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2000)
  • G.R. Ridgway et al.

    Issues with threshold masking in voxel-based morphometry of atrophied brains

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • B.H. Ridha et al.

    Tracking atrophy progression in familial Alzheimer's disease: a serial MRI study

    Lancet Neurol.

    (2006)
  • A. Rovira et al.

    MR in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an overview

    Eur. J. Radiol.

    (2008)
  • S.M. Smith et al.

    Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • C.D. Smith et al.

    Age and gender effects on human brain anatomy: a voxel-based morphometric study in healthy elderly

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2007)
  • S.J. Tabrizi et al.

    Biological and clinical manifestations of Huntington's disease in the longitudinal TRACK-HD study: cross-sectional analysis of baseline data

    Lancet Neurol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Taki et al.

    Voxel-based morphometry of human brain with age and cerebrovascular risk factors

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2004)
  • J.L. Whitwell et al.

    Rates of brain atrophy over time in autopsy-proven frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • J. Barnes et al.

    Structural magnetic resonance imaging-derived biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease

    Biomark. Med.

    (2007)
  • D. Chan et al.

    Rates of global and regional cerebral atrophy in AD and frontotemporal dementia

    Neurology

    (2001)
  • Cited by (390)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text