The neuropsychology of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis and review
Introduction
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a disorder characterized by affective instability, impulsivity, cognitive disruptions, and interpersonal difficulties (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), and it affects approximately 2% of the population (Swartz et al., 1990). The literature on BPD abounds with reports of memory (Korfine and Hooley, 2000, Startup et al., 2001) and perceptual distortions (George and Soloff, 1986, Sundbom et al., 1989, Yee et al., 2005), symptoms suggesting a potential underlying brain pathology in this often chronic psychiatric disorder. However, a clear characterization of the neurocognitive features of BPD has proved elusive.
While initial neurobehavioral studies of BPD appeared to demonstrate a link between acquired or developmental brain dysfunction and borderline psychopathology (Andrulonis et al., 1989, van Reekum, 1993, van Reekum et al., 1996), these early neuropsychological investigations failed to present a consistent pattern of neurocognitive disruption. For instance, a study by Cornelius et al. (1989) was unable to detect differences between BPD patients and a healthy control group selected from historical records in the domains of memory, language, motor, and spatial functioning.
O'Leary et al. (1991) were among the first to use a more methodologically sound approach to examine the neurocognition of BPD, revealing distinct impairments in BPD participants relative to controls primarily in tasks assessing memory, as well as the processes of visual discrimination and filtering. These results were largely supported by studies carried out by Judd and Ruff (1993) and Swirsky-Sacchetti et al. (1993). Although the latter investigation failed to replicate a decrement in performance for the BPD group on the digit-symbol test of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R, Wechsler, 1981), it was the only study to find a difference between groups in the interference condition of the Stroop Color and Word Test (Golden, 1978). In addition, using a short 11-item neurocognitive screening examination, Burgess (1990) demonstrated significant differences between groups on measures of memory and rhythm reproduction.
Many of the more recent neuropsychological investigations of BPD used more comprehensive neuropsychological batteries than used in earlier studies and seemed to identify specific neurocognitive impairments among BPD participants. Dinn et al. (2004) compared BPD and healthy control groups in a number of cognitive domains, particularly tasks assessing multiple facets of attention. BPD patients were impaired on tests of visuospatial abilities, speeded processing, and nonverbal memory skills, yet there were no striking differences observed on tests of attention, verbal memory, and alternation learning. Additional neurocognitive impairments associated with BPD were demonstrated by Bazanis et al. (2002), in which BPD participants performed more poorly on tasks assessing planning and decision-making but no differently in tests of visual recognition memory, including pattern and spatial recognition. Further, Posner et al. (2002) identified a specific deficiency in an attentional network involved in conflict resolution and cognitive control, which was distinct from systems involved in emotion regulation.
Despite the abundance of evidence in support of neurocognitive deficits in BPD, many investigations have failed to identify any remarkable differences between BPD and healthy control groups. Kunert et al. (2003) conducted extensive neuropsychological testing of BPD and healthy control participants, including assessments of intelligence, attention, visual scanning, cognitive flexibility, working memory, planning and problem solving, and learning and memory. Although BPD participants demonstrated higher scores on self-report measures of aggressiveness and impulsiveness, the patient group only performed more poorly than controls in the reading condition of the Stroop test and made more errors in the interference condition. Similarly, Sprock et al. (2000) observed no differences between groups on any of the neuropsychological measures they employed with the exception of one non-interference condition of the Stroop test in which BPD participants took significantly longer than the healthy control group to name color-congruent words. Theunissen and Walker (2003) also found no differences between BPD and depressed controls on measures of working memory, speeded processing, cognitive flexibility, planning, and visuospatial abilities.
Evidently the relationship between neurocognition and borderline psychopathology is unclear. The purpose of the present meta-analysis is to provide a unified examination of the current literature in to explicate the specific neuropsychological domains of functioning that may be impaired in persons with BPD. Interpreting individual investigations of BPD is complicated by the varied way in which BPD has been operationally defined, whether it be self-report, semi-structured interviews, or unstructured interviews. Studies have also differed widely in the specific neuropsychological measures used to assess the functional integrity of neural systems. These two sources of variability have contributed to an unclear understanding of the potential brain pathology that may underlie BPD, and it is expected that an amalgamation of these individual findings will generate a coherent characterization of the neurocognitive features of BPD.
Section snippets
Selection of studies
A search for articles was conducted using PubMed and PsycINFO with a combination of key words, including neuropsychology, neurocognition, cognitive, borderline personality, and personality disorder. All relevant references from articles obtained through this search were also reviewed for inclusion in the analysis. Table 1 presents descriptive data for the studies identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis.
Only those studies adhering to all of the following eligibility criteria were included
Results
Cohen (1988) provided guidelines by which to interpret effect sizes. An effect size (d) of 0.2 is considered small, 0.5 medium, and 0.8 or higher large. Effect sizes were calculated between BPD and healthy control groups across studies for each neuropsychological domain.
Discussion
The results of this meta-analysis revealed a significant difference between BPD and healthy comparison groups across multiple neuropsychological domains. BPD patients generally performed more poorly than healthy comparison groups on global dimensions of attention, cognitive flexibility, learning and memory, planning, speeded processing, and visuospatial abilities. The effect sizes were primarily in the medium-to-large range, with the smallest effect size observed for the cognitive flexibility
Acknowledgments
The author acknowledges fellowship support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Drexel University College of Arts and Sciences.
References (67)
- et al.
Functional anatomy of top-down visuospatial processing in the human brain: evidence from rTMS. Brain Research
Cognitive Brain Research
(2002) - et al.
Neurocognitive function in borderline personality disorder
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Amygdala hyperreactivity in borderline personality disorder: implications for emotional dysregulation
Biological Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
Posttraumatic stress disorder and fMRI activation patterns of traumatic memory in patients with borderline personality disorder
Biological Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Partial seizure-like symptoms in borderline personality disorder
Epilepsy and Behavior
(2002) - et al.
Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding
Neuron
(1998) - et al.
Neuropsychological impairment in borderline personality disorder
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
(2004) - et al.
Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the Tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception
Neuropsychologia
(2003) - et al.
A positron emission tomography study of memories of childhood abuse in borderline personality disorder
Biological Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Borderline personality disorder: impaired visual perception and working memory
Psychiatry Research
(2004)
Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location
Neuropsychologia
Frontolimbic brain abnormalities in patients with borderline personality disorder: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study
Biological Psychiatry
Persistent hallucinosis in borderline personality disorder
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Distinguishing visuospatial working memory and complex mental calculation areas within the parietal lobes
Neuroscience Letters
Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders — Text Revision
Organic brain dysfunction and the borderline syndrome
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Neurocognitive deficits in decision-making and planning of patients with DSM-III-R borderline personality disorder
Psychological Medicine
Cognitive information processing in borderline personality disorder: a neuropsychiatric hypothesis
Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix
Psychological Bulletin
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
An evaluation of the significance of selected neuropsychiatric abnormalities in the etiology of borderline personality disorder
Journal of Personality Disorders
Neural mechanisms of planning: a computational analysis using event-related fMRI
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Schizotypal symptoms in patients with borderline personality disorders
American Journal of Psychiatry
Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research
Educational Researcher
Stroop Color and Word Test Manual
Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size
Psychological Methods
The Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines
American Journal of Psychiatry
Too many variables! Some strategies for analyzing multiple dependent variables in complex designs
Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis
Planning and problem solving skills following focal frontal brain lesions in childhood: analysis using the Tower of London
Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section C, Child Neuropsychology
Brain activation on fMRI and verbal memory ability: functional neuroanatomic correlates of CVLT performance
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Cited by (217)
Borderline personality disorder features are associated with inflexible social interpretations
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersResting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging alterations in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review
2023, Journal of Affective DisordersEfficacy and tolerability of Brain Stimulation interventions in Borderline Personality Disorder: state of the art and future perspectives – A systematic review
2022, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryA dance movement therapy intervention for people with a personality disorder: A Delphi study
2022, Arts in PsychotherapyCitation Excerpt :Moreover, core executive functions, such as self-control, working memory and creative thinking are addressed (Diamond, 2013; Hanna, 2014; Risner, 2000; Sheets-Johnstone, 2012). For these reasons, the use of choreography in DMT could be specifically beneficial for people with a borderline PD, as their executive functioning is often impaired (Ruocco, 2005). In addition, focusing on a specific task diminishes neural responses to emotional stimuli, while emotion regulation and mentalising capacities are expanded in PD clients (Batcup, 2013; Livesley & Larstone, 2018).
The Assessment of Intelligence: What is Behind Us, Before Us and Ahead of Us
2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second Edition