Evidence for excessive frontal evoked gamma oscillatory activity in schizophrenia during working memory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Gamma (γ) oscillations (30–50 Hz) elicited during working memory (WM) are altered in schizophrenia (SCZ). However, the nature of the relationship between evoked frontal oscillatory activity, WM performance and symptom severity has yet to be ascertained. This study had two objectives. First, to extend previous studies by examining delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma (δ, θ, α, β, and γ) oscillatory activities during the N-back task in SCZ patients compared to healthy subjects; second, to evaluate the relationship between oscillatory activities elicited during the N-back, performance, and clinical symptoms in SCZ patients. Patients with SCZ elicited excessive frontal γ oscillatory activity that was most pronounced in the 3-back condition compared to healthy subjects. Reduced frontal β activity at all WM loads was also observed in patients with SCZ compared to healthy subjects. Task performance was inversely correlated with negative symptoms but not with positive symptoms. Our findings suggest that evoked frontal oscillatory activities during WM are selectively altered in the γ and β frequency bands that may contribute to WM impairment in SCZ patients. These findings may provide important insights into the pathophysiology underlying WM deficits, its relationship to negative symptoms and may represent a potential neurobiological marker for cognitive enhancing strategies in SCZ.

Introduction

Gamma (γ) oscillations (30–50 Hz) have been shown to be a key neurophysiological mechanism underlying working memory (WM), a cognitive process involving the maintenance and manipulation of information on-line (Baddeley, 1986). Increased γ oscillatory activity with increased WM load has been demonstrated in epileptic patients (Howard et al., 2003) and healthy subjects (Basar-Eroglu et al., 2007) with electroencephalography (EEG) especially in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Although γ modulation in the DLPFC is most consistently associated with WM, delta (δ; 1–3.5 Hz), theta (θ; 4–8 Hz), alpha (α; 9–12 Hz), and beta (β; 14–28 Hz) activities also vary with WM load (Barr et al., 2009).

Altered oscillatory activity during WM has been demonstrated in SCZ. Abnormal δ (Ince et al., 2009), θ (Haenschel et al., 2009, Schmiedt et al., 2005), α (Bachman et al., 2008, Ince et al., 2009, Stephane et al., 2008) and β (Stephane et al., 2008) activation during WM has been shown in SCZ patients. However, inconsistent reports reveal both similar (Haenschel et al., 2009) and abnormally increased (Basar-Eroglu et al., 2007) γ oscillatory activity during WM in SCZ compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, Basar-Eroglu et al. (2007) demonstrated that SCZ patients failed to modulate γ oscillatory activity with WM load as found in healthy subjects (Basar-Eroglu et al., 2007). The lack of γ modulation with WM load in SCZ patients may be attributed to alterations in γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons in the DLPFC (Akbarian et al., 1995, Benes and Berretta, 2001, Hashimoto et al., 2008, Lewis et al., 2005) critical to γ oscillatory activity. Considering the importance of GABA in the generation (Bartos et al., 2007, Wang and Buzsaki, 1996, Whittington et al., 1995) and modulation (Brown et al., 2007, Whittington et al., 1995) of γ oscillations, GABAergic impairments in patients with SCZ may underlie altered modulation of γ oscillatory during WM.

The relationship between γ oscillatory activity, WM performance, and clinical symptoms has yet to be determined. In a behavioural study, Park et al. (1999) reported on a relationship between WM performance and negative symptoms in SCZ patients, such that increased negative symptoms related to poor WM (Park et al., 1999). Additionally, an fMRI study in SCZ patients demonstrated a correlation between strength of prefrontal-parietal connectivity and WM performance, while positive symptoms related to decreased connectivity (Henseler et al., 2009). Relationships have also been uncovered between γ oscillatory activity with both positive and negative symptoms although through an auditory odd-ball task and not WM (Lee et al., 2003). In this study, patients were divided by symptom predominance and found that positive symptoms correlated with increased γ, while negative symptoms were related to a reduction of γ (Lee et al., 2003). As such, γ oscillations during WM may be related to both performance and symptom severity in SCZ patients. In the current study, therefore, we aimed to extend previous findings by examining evoked oscillatory activity during WM across δ, θ, α, β, and γ frequency components measured from the frontal region in SCZ patients compared to healthy subjects. We also sought to examine if neuronal oscillations during WM were related to task performance and symptom severity.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-four (males = 14; females = 10) patients with a diagnosis of SCZ or schizoaffective disorder (SCZ = 19; schizoaffective disorder = 5), confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (Spitzer, 1994), and 24 (males = 13; females = 11) healthy subjects participated in this study. All subjects were right handed (Oldfield, 1971). SCZ patients were treated with antipsychotic medication (15.0 ± 14.1 mg olanzapine, 5 patients; 318.8 ± 196.3 mg clozapine, 8 patients; 3.7 ± 1.5 mg risperidone, 3 patients;

Working memory performance

N-back performance decreased with increased WM load (F(2,104) = 69.678; p < 0.0001; Table 2). Subjects performed significantly worse in 3- compared to 2- and in 2- compared to 1-back condition (p < 0.0001 in both cases). The Group difference in N-back performance was also significant (F(1,44) = 9.533; p = 0.004) with SCZ patients performing significantly worse compared to healthy subjects. Mean reaction time increased with increased WM load (F(2,88) = 17.263; p < 0.0001; Table 2) that significantly increased

Discussion

SCZ patients generated excessive evoked frontal γ oscillatory activity that was most pronounced in the 3-back compared to healthy subjects. Task performance was inversely correlated with negative symptoms but not with positive symptoms. Finally, there was a reduction in β oscillatory activity in SCZ patients, but this was not related to symptom severity, task performance or WM load.

Consistent with Basar-Eroglu et al (2007), we observed an increase in frontal γ oscillatory activity at each WM

Role of funding sources

This work was funded, in part, by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (grant no. MOP 62917 to RC), CIHR Clinician Scientist Award (ZJD), CIHR doctoral award (FF), by an operating and studentship award from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation (ZJD and MB, respectively) by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship (PBF) and by Constance and Stephen Lieber through a National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Lieber

Contributors

PBF and ZJD were involved the study design and writing of the protocol.

MSB performed the literature searches.

LCT helped with subject recruitment and administration of clinical scales.

MSB and FF managed experimental testing of subjects.

MSB and ZJD performed the data statistical analysis.

MSB wrote the manuscript.

All authors contributed to and have approved the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of all persons and volunteers whose participation was essential in the successful completion of the study.

References (55)

  • C. Tallon-Baudry et al.

    Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (1999)
  • J. Ventura et al.

    Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2009)
  • V. Villalta-Gil et al.

    Neurocognitive performance and negative symptoms: are they equal in explaining disability in schizophrenia outpatients?

    Schizophr. Res.

    (2006)
  • S. Yuval-Greenberg et al.

    Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades

    Neuron

    (2008)
  • D. Addington et al.

    Assessing depression in schizophrenia: the Calgary Depression Scale

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • Akbarian S, Kim JJ, Potkin SG, Hagman JO, Tafazzoli A, Bunney WE, Jr., et al. (1995). Gene expression for glutamic acid...
  • N.C. Andreasen

    The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): conceptual and theoretical foundations

    Br. J. Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • A. Baddeley

    Working Memory

    (1986)
  • M.S. Barr et al.

    In response to: the potentially deleterious impact of muscle activity on gamma band inferences

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2010)
  • M.S. Barr et al.

    Potentiation of gamma oscillatory activity through repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2009)
  • M. Bartos et al.

    Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • R. Bender et al.

    Testing the Gaussianity of the human EEG during anesthesia

    Meth. Inf. Med.

    (1992)
  • R.M. Bilder et al.

    Neurocognitive effects of clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, and haloperidol in patients with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder

    Am. J. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • J.T. Brown et al.

    Synaptic activation of GABA(B) receptors regulates neuronal network activity and entrainment

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • J.H. Callicott et al.

    Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI

    Cereb. Cortex

    (1999)
  • T. Collin et al.

    Developmental changes in parvalbumin regulate presynaptic Ca2+ signaling

    J. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • N. Cowan

    The majical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text