Opinion
Affect-biased attention as emotion regulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.003Get rights and content

The affective biasing of attention is not typically considered to be a form of emotion regulation. In this article, we argue that ‘affect-biased attention’ – the predisposition to attend to certain categories of affectively salient stimuli over others – provides an important component of emotion regulation. Affect-biased attention regulates subsequent emotional responses by tuning one's filters for initial attention and subsequent processing. By reviewing parallel research in the fields of emotion regulation and affect-biased attention, as well as clinical and developmental research on individual differences in attentional biases, we provide convergent evidence that habitual affective filtering processes, tuned and re-tuned over development and situation, modulate emotional responses to the world. Moreover, they do so in a manner that is proactive rather than reactive.

Section snippets

Affect-biased attention is a form of emotion regulation

Emotion regulation, defined as ‘all of the conscious and non-conscious strategies we use to increase, maintain, or decrease one or more components of an emotional response’ [1], encompasses a wide array of strategies, ranging from implicit to explicit and reactive to effortful (see Glossary), that can be applied in anticipation of or in response to an emotional stressor 2, 3. Yet, despite the range of processes studied under the rubric of emotion regulation, including a number of attentional

Biased attention to affectively salient events

Like emotion regulation, attentional selection is a broad category that includes a number of component processes. For example, attention can be deployed before or after an event and can involve rapid or more extended processes, ranging from antecedent biasing of attention via control settings, to subsequent engagement of attention by stimulus salience, to later ease or difficulty of disengagement when an attentional shift is demanded [20]. Here, we discuss affect-biased attention as a specific

Affective tuning can shift with age and context

The affective salience model emphasizes that amygdala tuning, as a tractable index of motivational salience, is sensitive to both moment-to-moment and developmental context. Earlier notions of the amygdala's role in affective processing emphasized the idea that enhanced attention to threat, marked by enhanced amygdala activation, was ‘hard-wired’ in the service of evolutionary goals (e.g., [41]). A more recent conception is that, rather than being a hard-wired ‘automatic threat detector’, the

Individual differences in affect-biased attention

We suggest that well-documented individual differences in affect-biased attention to positive or negative stimuli reflect individual differences in habitual employment of affectively motivated control settings, which play a regulatory role by influencing subsequent regulatory processes. A recent study [52] found that participants who were high in a form of neuroticism linked to volatility, which involves predisposition towards anger or irritation, as well as affect-biased attention for negative

Attentional biases influence emotional responding and are trainable

It is well established that some people are predisposed to focus on threatening aspects of a scene, whereas others focus on the positive aspects 53, 54. For example, imagine looking out at a sea of faces before giving a lecture. Some people habitually zoom in on frowning or bored faces. Others are predisposed to find smiles of approval. A robust body of research has linked attentional biases toward threatening versus neutral or positive images with normative and clinical anxiety [53], and

Attentional biases emerge early, influence behavioral outcomes, and are trainable in children

Attentional biases, which are associated with common genetic variations [61], can be measured as early in development as five years [62]. They are also associated with behavioral outcomes early in development. For example, a recent study demonstrated that attentional biases to threat predicted whether temperamentally inhibited children would demonstrate social withdrawal behaviors at age five [63]. Moreover, recent research has extended ABM training to anxiety reduction in children, as well. In

Direct measures of affect-biased attention

It is important to note that exogenous spatial cueing tasks, such as the dot probe, do not directly measure/manipulate antecedent tuning of perceptual filters to specific categories of stimuli. Thus, they are not direct measures of affect-biased attention as a form of habitual control setting that precedes stimulus presentation. Rather, they measure rapid capture and/or sustained retention of exogenous spatial attention following presentation of salient stimuli [55]. Thus, they measure the

Future directions

Despite the fact that there are suggestive data supporting our proposal that affect-biased attention is a form of emotion regulation, further research is required to test directly the influence of affect-biased attention on behavioral and physiological measures associated with emotional response to emotional challenges, as well as on measures of specific downstream regulatory processes (Box 2). Future research can also draw on animal models and human neurogenetics to elucidate the role of

Concluding remarks

If affect-biased attention is a form of emotion regulation, as we have argued here, one might wonder whether any form of emotion is unregulated – and hence whether the term ‘emotion regulation’ is ultimately meaningful. In the end, when one delineates the full range of subcomponents that modulate cognition/emotion interactions over multiple timescales, one may conclude that there is at no stage a ‘pure’ emotional response that is not always already regulated in some way. Not only may it be

Glossary

Affect-biased attention
attentional biases that give rise to preferential perception of a particular category of stimulus based on its relative affective salience.
Affective control setting
a habitual ‘mental set,’ based on our history of experience with what is motivationally relevant in a given context, which biases attention prior to an event.
Affective salience
the tendency of an item to stand out relative to its neighbors due to an association between its semantic meaning and emotional arousal.

References (72)

  • E. Fox

    Preconscious processing biases predict emotional reactivity to stress

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2010)
  • A. Lutz

    Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2008)
  • P.D. Zelazo

    The development of conscious control in childhood

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2004)
  • W.A. Cunningham et al.

    Attitudes and evaluations: a social cognitive neuroscience perspective

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2007)
  • J.J. Gross

    Emotion regulation in adulthood: timing is everything

    Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.

    (2001)
  • J.J. Gross

    Cognition and Emotion Lecture at the 2010 SPSP Emotion Preconference

    Cogn. Emot.

    (2011)
  • N. Eisenberg

    Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment

    Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • J.J. Gross et al.

    Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations

  • L.E. Williams

    The unconscious regulation of emotion: nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity

    Emotion

    (2009)
  • A. Gyurak

    Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework

    Cogn. Emot.

    (2011)
  • N.A. Fox et al.

    The development of self-control of emotion: intrinsic and extrinsic influences

    Motiv. Emot.

    (2003)
  • M.K. Rothbart et al.

    Development of individual differences in temperament

  • Silvers, J.A., et al. Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in...
  • H.A. Wadlinger et al.

    Fixing our focus: training attention to regulate emotion

    Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • J.S. Bruner et al.

    Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal

    Abnorm. Psychol.

    (1947)
  • M.D. Lewis

    Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2005)
  • L. Pessoa

    On the relationship between emotion and cognition

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2008)
  • K.R. Scherer

    Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci.

    (2009)
  • A. Kappas

    Emotion is not just an alarm bell – it's the whole tootin’ fire truck

    Cogn. Emot.

    (2011)
  • B. Mesquita et al.

    An emotion perspective on emotion regulation

    Cogn. Emot.

    (2011)
  • D. Cosmelli

    Attending to the stream of consciousness: A methodological challenge

  • L. Itti

    A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis

    IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.

    (1998)
  • X. Hou et al.

    Saliency detection: a spectral residual approach

    Proc. IEEE CVPR

    (2007)
  • R. Desimone et al.

    Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (1995)
  • C.L. Folk

    Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (263)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text