Regular Research Articles
Relationship Between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale in Depressed Elderly: A Meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318098614eGet rights and content

Objective

To determine whether the sensitivity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to treatment effects are comparable in geriatric antidepressant randomized controlled trials by developing and validating an equation that links between the two instruments.

Methods

Literature search for this meta-analysis was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis, and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The search resulted in 11 relevant geriatric antidepressant trial studies that administered both instruments for symptom ratings. The authors used baseline ratings as a model-building sample and postrandomization ratings as a validation sample. HDRS scores were prorated into HDRS17, a 17-item HDRS, for analysis. The development and validation was based on a total number of 1,874 subjects.

Results

The correlations were high between baseline mean HDRS17 and MADRS ratings (r = 0.80; Fisher's z = 1.09, N = 25, p <0.0001) and between postrandomization ratings (r = 0.88, Fisher's z = 1.39, N = 65, p <0.0001). The following equation was derived: HDRS17 = −1.58 + 0.86 × MADRS. The difference between observed and estimated HDRS17 in a validation sample consisting of postrandomization follow-up means did not depend on magnitudes of HDRS17.

Conclusion

Although generalizability of findings into a broader population could be limited, and the authors could not assess concordance of changes of particular item constructs between HDRS and MADRS ratings, both ratings are comparable in assessing changes in overall depressive symptom severity in response to antidepressants in depressed elderly at aggregated group mean levels.

Section snippets

Literature Search

The search was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis conducted by the Cochrane group,5 and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The MEDLINE search resulted in 56 papers published by August 31, 2006 with the following key words: “geriatric depression” AND “clinical trial” AND “antidepressant.” The meta-analysis on studies of antidepressants in geriatric population4 listed more than 160 papers as references. The experts in geriatric antidepressants trials

Study Characteristics

The application of selection criteria resulted in 12 geriatric antidepressant trials published since 1992.6., 7., 8., 9., 10., 11., 12., 13., 14., 15., 16., 17. However, we excluded one study17 that used a scale of 0–3 for MADRS rating. Table 1 presents a summary of study characteristics over 11 studies. The total number of groups was 25 out of the remaining 11 studies, with 1,874 total subjects. Among these, 1,284 (68.5%) were females. Five studies6., 7., 11., 12., 13. used the 17 items for

DISCUSSION

The relatively high correlations between HDRS17 and MADRS in both the model building sample (r = 0.80) and the validation sample (r = 0.88) shows that they are highly comparable. This finding is notable given that the two instruments emphasize different symptoms. The correlation from the validation sample in particular is higher than those reported in a review by Bagby et al.,18 where the convergent validity of these was reported to range between 0.68 and 0.85 in mixed-aged adult samples. In

References (22)

  • C Geretsegger et al.

    Multicenter double blind study of paroxetine and amitriptyline in elderly depressed inpatients

    Psychopharmacology

    (1995)
  • Cited by (81)

    • Time-course of the tDCS antidepressant effect: An individual participant data meta-analysis

      2023, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
    • Sex-specifics of ECT outcome

      2023, Journal of Affective Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health (grants P30MH068638, U01MH62518, and K23MH67702).

    View full text