Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Knockdown of Human TCF4 Affects Multiple Signaling Pathways Involved in Cell Survival, Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Neuronal Differentiation

  • Marc P. Forrest,

    Affiliation Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Adrian J. Waite,

    Affiliation Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Enca Martin-Rendon,

    Affiliations Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Stem Cell Research Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

    ⨯
  • Derek J. Blake

    blakedj@cardiff.ac.uk

    Affiliation Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, MRC Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom

    ⨯

Abstract

Haploinsufficiency of TCF4 causes Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS): a severe form of mental retardation with phenotypic similarities to Angelman, Mowat-Wilson and Rett syndromes. Genome-wide association studies have also found that common variants in TCF4 are associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia. Although TCF4 is transcription factor, little is known about TCF4-regulated processes in the brain. In this study we used genome-wide expression profiling to determine the effects of acute TCF4 knockdown on gene expression in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. We identified 1204 gene expression changes (494 upregulated, 710 downregulated) in TCF4 knockdown cells. Pathway and enrichment analysis on the differentially expressed genes in TCF4-knockdown cells identified an over-representation of genes involved in TGF-β signaling, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and apoptosis. Among the most significantly differentially expressed genes were the EMT regulators, SNAI2 and DEC1 and the proneural genes, NEUROG2 and ASCL1. Altered expression of several mental retardation genes such as UBE3A (Angelman Syndrome), ZEB2 (Mowat-Wilson Syndrome) and MEF2C was also found in TCF4-depleted cells. These data suggest that TCF4 regulates a number of convergent signaling pathways involved in cell differentiation and survival in addition to a subset of clinically important mental retardation genes.

Citation: Forrest MP, Waite AJ, Martin-Rendon E, Blake DJ (2013) Knockdown of Human TCF4 Affects Multiple Signaling Pathways Involved in Cell Survival, Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition and Neuronal Differentiation. PLoS ONE 8(8): e73169. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169

Editor: Barbara Bardoni, CNRS UMR7275, France

Received: March 30, 2013; Accepted: July 18, 2013; Published: August 23, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Forrest et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Funding: This work was funded by a Medical Research Council (http://www.mrc.ac.uk/index.htm) studentship (MPF) and an MRC Centenary Award (DJB, MPF). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Transcription factor 4 (TCF4) is a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor involved in neurodevelopment and dendritic cell diversification in the immune system [1–5]. Mounting genetic and biological evidence supports a crucial role for TCF4 in healthy brain function. Mutations in TCF4 cause Pitt-Hopkins syndrome (PTHS); a severe mental retardation syndrome associated with a facial gestalt, breathing abnormalities, visual problems, delayed speech development and seizures [6–8]. PTHS is caused by deletions, nonsense and missense mutations in the TCF4 gene on human chromosome 18, resulting in haploinsufficiency [6–9]. The majority of TCF4 missense mutations cluster in the bHLH domain of the protein where they attenuate transcription and can impair protein–protein interactions [6,8,10–12]. In addition to PTHS, balanced chromosomal abnormalities disrupting TCF4 and copy number variants have been found in patients with autism and neurodevelopmental disorders that were previously undiagnosed with PTHS [13].

In addition to rare mutations, common variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNP) in TCF4 are associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia [14,15]. Genome-wide association studies found that a SNP (rs9960767) located in intron 3 of TCF4 was associated with schizophrenia (P = 4.1 x 10-9), surpassing the statistical threshold for genome-wide significance [14,15]. Additional TCF4 variants have also been associated with schizophrenia providing further support for TCF4 as a schizophrenia risk gene [1]. Interestingly, the rs9960767 risk allele is correlated with impaired sensorimotor gating and cognitive performance, mirroring established schizophrenia endophenotypes [16,17]. Recently, Wirgenes and colleagues found that psychosis was associated with elevated TCF4 transcript levels and that TCF4 risk variants were associated with a range of clinical, cognitive and brain morphological abnormalities [18]. Multiple alternatively spliced TCF4 isoforms have been described, however the role of the different spliced forms on transcription has not been extensively studied [19,20]. It is therefore possible that SNPs associated with schizophrenia may differentially regulate the expression of one or more TCF4 isoforms leading to subtle changes in critical neurodevelopmental pathways.

TCF4, TCF12 (HEB), TCF3 (E2A) form the class I bHLH transcription factors in humans [21]. TCF4 interacts with a potentially large repertoire of transcription factors including the products of proneural genes such as ASCL1, ATOH1 and NEUROD1 to regulate neurogenesis and cell type specification in the developing brain [5,15,22,23]. ASCL1, ATOH1 and NEUROD1 are bHLH transcription factors that form obligatory heterodimers with TCF4 (and other E-proteins) to regulate gene expression at E-box containing promoters. Heterodimers bind directly to E-boxes that have the consensus sequence “CANNTG” allowing them to regulate gene expression. Additionally, the structurally related ID (inhibitors of differentiation) proteins such as ID2, are dominant-negative regulators of TCF4. ID proteins form inactive heterodimers with TCF4 preventing the sequestered protein from binding E-boxes or interacting with other transcriptional activators thereby maintaining cells in an undifferentiated state. During neurodevelopment, the balance of E-proteins, proneural and ID proteins in a cell are therefore an important regulatory step in determining cell fate [24].

The role of TCF4 in brain development and behavior has also been studied in mouse models. Homozygous Tcf4 knockout mice do not survive past birth and although gross brain structure and size does not seem to be affected, there are specific regions of the pontine nucleus where cells fail to migrate to their correct positions [5]. Furthermore, adult mice moderately over-expressing TCF4 in the brain have behavioural abnormalities including deficits in sensory-motor gating and cognitive performance, reminiscent of certain schizophrenia endophenotypes [22].

Although TCF4 has been studied in the context of neurodevelopment and behavior, very little is known about TCF4 regulated genes and processes in the developing and adult nervous system. In this study we use small interfering RNA (siRNA) to acutely knockdown TCF4 in the SH-SY5Y neuronal cell line. Using microarrays and conservative pathway analysis we find that TCF4 knockdown is associated with robust gene expression changes in multiple, convergent signaling pathways.

Results

Knockdown of TCF4 in SH-SY5Y cells

To determine the effects of TCF4 depletion on gene expression in a cell line of neuronal origin, we tested a series of siRNA duplexes for their efficacy in knocking down TCF4 in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were chosen because they express high levels of TCF4 and can be efficiently transfected with single siRNA duplexes to achieve a robust knockdown. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and quantitative western blots were used to test the efficacy of each duplex to knockdown TCF4. qPCR analysis of each knockdown showed that KD1 (exon 12) caused an 80% reduction of the TCF4 transcript whereas KD2 (exon 19) reduced TCF4 expression by 62% compared to mock transfected cells (Figure 1A). Importantly, siRNAs targeting GAPDH (exons 1 and 2) and mock transfection had no significant effect on the level of the TCF4 transcript (Figure 1A). Reduced levels of the TCF4 protein was also verified by quantitative western blotting (Figure 1B and 1C). Knockdown of TCF4 with TCF4 KD1 and KD2 resulted in a greater than 80% reduction in proteins levels with both duplexes. KD2 was less effective than KD1 at knocking down the TCF4 protein reflecting the qPCR data.

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 1. siRNA-mediated knockdown of TCF4 in SH-SY5Y cells.

SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with siRNA oligonucleotides targeting TCF4 (KD1 and KD2) or GAPDH. After 72h, RNA and protein were extracted to assess the knockdown efficiency. (A) Primers complimentary to a constitutive exon present in all TCF4 isoforms (exon 13) were used to measure overall transcript abundance by qPCR in three biological replicates. TCF4 knockdown efficiency was similar with both KD1 and KD2 whereas the control GAPDH KD did not affect TCF4 transcript levels. (B) Western blots of protein lysates prepared from siRNA-treated SH-SY5Y cells demonstrated that KD1 and KD2 reduced TCF4 levels whilst GAPDH knockdown had no apparent effect. α-tubulin was used as a loading control and for normalization. (C) LI-COR quantitation of TCF4 protein levels in siRNA-treated cells. The levels of TCF4 in each experiment were quantified and normalized to α-tubulin as described previously [54,55]. In agreement with the qPCR results, siRNA treatment reduced TCF4 levels to approximately 20% of wild-type compared to mock or GAPDH KD-treated cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.g001

Microarray analysis of TCF4 knockdown

RNA prepared from siRNA-treated cells was converted to cDNA, labeled and hybridized to a Toray microarray for genome-wide transcript analysis. Two control groups, mock transfected and GAPDH siRNA transfected, were used for background correction. The GAPDH siRNA control was used because it has minimal off-target effects and is able to activate the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Since TCF4 KD1 produced more gene expression changes than knockdown with TCF4 KD2 (overlap 79%) both treatment groups were combined in the ANOVA. A one-way ANOVA comparing the control (mock and GAPDH) and TCF4 (TCF4 KD1 and KD2) knockdown groups was used to identify differentially expressed genes in TCF4-depleted cells. Gene expression changes clustered with the experimental treatment indicating that each siRNA had a distinct but overlapping gene expression signature (Figure S1). A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01 was used to generate a high confidence list of 1204 differentially expressed genes (494 upregulated, 710 downregulated). The top 40 up- and downregulated genes ranked by fold change are illustrated in Figure 2A. Initial examination of the most robust gene expression changes in TCF4-knockdown cells (Figure 2A) appeared to suggest a role for TCF4 in apoptosis or inflammasome function (up-regulation of CASP1 and CASP4), cell signaling (down-regulation of IGF2, BMP7 and LEFTY1) and neurodevelopment (down-regulation of NEUROG2, ASCL1 and MEF2C). Furthermore, several of the major gene expression changes in TCF4-knockdown cells involved transcription factors including ASCL1 and NEUROG2 that interact directly with TCF4 at E-boxes [6,10,11,25]. Finally, a number of imprinted genes, IGF2, H19 and CDKN1C were prominent amongst the most significantly downregulated genes in TCF4-knockdown cells (Figure 2A).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 2. Overview of differentially expressed genes after TCF4 knockdown.

(A) Top 40 upregulated (upper panel) and downregulated (lower panel) genes after FDR correction (0.01) ranked by fold change. (B) Functional characterization of all differentially expressed genes (upregulated and downregulated) (FDR 0.01) using GOSLIM annotations. All annotation categories representing less than 4% of the gene list were grouped and labeled as “other”.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.g002

qPCR was used to independently validate the gene expression changes detected on the microarray. We selected 5 up- (FAS, NTRK1, CASP8, NOTCH1, CASP1) and 5 down- regulated genes (IGF2, CDKN1C, NEUROG2, BMP7, CDK6) that had a fold change above or below 1.5. The genes were also selected on the basis of their known importance to developmental processes and their recurrent appearance in the downstream enrichment analyses (see below). Transcript abundance was measured from the same RNA samples used on the microarray, allowing a direct comparison of the inferred changes. Each of the 10 genes was confirmed as differentially expressed by qPCR and had similar fold changes to that detected in the microarray (Table 1).

MicroarrayqPCR
GeneFold changeP valueFold changeP value
FAS1.92.88E-052.93.58E-05
NTRK13.81.53E-054.13.58E-05
CASP83.01.38E-0510.42.40E-03
NOTCH12.31.02E-042.96.03E-05
CASP115.76.13E-059.88.06E-03
IGF2-5.21.52E-06-4.22.51E-05
CDKN1C-2.42.36E-06-2.31.02E-03
NEUROG2-3.01.50E-05-3.68.30E-07
BMP7-3.71.34E-04-2.45.46E-05
CDK6-2.92.87E-07-2.63.71E-06

Table 1. qPCR validation of differentially expressed genes.

Ten differentially expressed genes belonging to various functional categories were chosen for qPCR validation. All the genes selected for validation had similar fold changes by qPCR to that seen on the microarray. In both cases, the presented P values represent the statistical significance between the pooled control (mock treated, GAPDH KD) and TCF4 KD (KD1, KD2) groups.
CSV
Download CSV

Enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in TCF4-depleted cells

Initial functional annotations associated with the 1204 differentially expressed genes in TCF4-knockdown cells were found to span a range of biological functions that cluster around the broad themes of metabolism, development and cell signaling (Figure 2B). To ascertain whether any biological functions were enriched in our high confidence gene list, we selected all genes with Entrez gene IDs for enrichment analysis. Of the 1204 genes that passed FDR correction of 0.01, 1031 had corresponding Entrez IDs (425 upregulated, 606 downregulated) and were statistically tested for GO annotation enrichment using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) [26]. Functional annotations from up- and downregulated genes were compared separately to a background list of genes consisting of all expressed genes detected on the microarray. This analysis identified several biological processes that were significantly enriched (FDR 0.05) in TCF4 knockdown cells. These terms included non-coding RNA metabolic processes, apoptosis and regulation of NF-κB signaling (Table 2). Many of the terms in this analysis are related to apoptosis. Importantly, up- and down- regulated genes seemed to cluster by distinct functional annotations (Table 2). For example, regulation of the NF-κB and apoptotic signaling cascades and were significantly enriched in the upregulated genes whereas annotations relating to non-coding RNA metabolism, ribosome biogenesis and protein folding were downregulated as a consequence of TCF4 knockdown. Although not all the GO annotations listed in the downregulated gene category passed multiple test correction, they were nominally significant (P < 0.05) and functionally linked.

GO annotationGenesP value
  1. Corrected
Upregulated genes (423 DAVID IDs)
1GO:0043122~regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB cascadeCD40, TFG, TNFSF10, CASP1, TBK1, PLK2, TRIM38, NOD1, RHOC, HTR2B, WLS, CARD8, SHISA5, TRADD, ZDHHC174.87E-078.50E-04*
2GO:0042981~regulation of apoptosisMEF2C, LOC100289713, NGFRAP1, ARHGEF6, NOTCH1, SH3GLB1, TNFSF13B, B4GALT1, TNFSF10, IDO1, BNIP3, APH1A, NOD1, ADAM17, CARD8, NGFR, SOCS3, KALRN, TRADD, SOX9, MSX2, AEN, CADM1, BARD1, CASP4, CREB1, CD38, CASP1, AKT1, CASP3, MCL1, JAK2, DPF2, TXNIP, FAS, TIA1, ANGPTL4, EYA1, YWHAZ, NTRK1, SIRT1, BCL2L131.10E-051.92E-02*
3GO:0009967~positive regulation of signal transductionCD40, BMPR1A, TFG, HIF1A, FKBP8, TNFSF10, CASP1, JAK2, TBK1, PLK2, TRIM38, NOD1, HTR2B, ADAM17, JAG1, RHOC, WLS, RICTOR, SMAD4, SHISA5, TRADD, ZDHHC171.18E-052.06E-02*
Downregulated genes (598 DAVID IDs)
1GO:0034660~ncRNA metabolic processCARS2, FARSB, POP7, TSEN2, WDR12, EXOSC1, DUS3L, TARSL2, ADAT2, RPL35A, PDCD11, PIWIL1, IMP4, QTRTD1, TRMT10C, PUS3, EXOSC7, FTSJ1, MKI67IP, RPL7, DIMT12.42E-054.14E-02*
2GO:0022613~ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesisWDR12, GEMIN6, RRS1, EXOSC1, NCBP1, SURF6, RPL35A, TSR1, IMP4, PDCD11, GEMIN5, EXOSC7, FTSJ1, NUFIP1, MRTO4, RPL7, BYSL, DIMT13.72E-056.37E-02
3GO:0042254~ribosome biogenesisWDR12, RRS1, EXOSC1, SURF6, RPL35A, TSR1, IMP4, PDCD11, FTSJ1, EXOSC7, MRTO4, RPL7, BYSL, DIMT18.01E-051.37E-01
4GO:0006457~protein foldingBAG2, DNAJC12, SEC63, RUVBL2, FKBP7, GRPEL1, APCS, SACS, PFDN6, HSPBP1, PPIF, PPID, CCT6A, URI1, PPIH7.06E-041.20

Table 2. GO term enrichment analysis using DAVID.

The Entrez Gene IDs of upregulated and downregulated genes were analyzed separately for biological process enrichment using DAVID. Enriched GO terms are ranked in order of decreasing significance. The gene IDs in each GO category are listed alongside the corrected (FDR) and uncorrected P values. For clarity redundant terms were removed. * Pass FDR correction of 0.05.
CSV
Download CSV

To determine whether the apoptotic cell death pathway was indeed activated in TCF4-depleted cells, we examined cell viability and caspase activation after treatment with the different siRNAs (Figure 3). TCF4-knockdown was associated with significantly reduced cell viability compared to the control groups (P = 2.8x10-16). Reduced cell viability was also associated with increased caspase 3/7 activity (P = 1.3x10-3) in TCF4-depleted cells (Figure 3A). Caspase-3 cleavage, which occurs in cells undergoing apoptosis, was also detected by western blotting in TCF4-depleted cells (Figure 3B). Interestingly, cells treated with TCF4 KD2 showed more evidence of apoptotic cell death and reduced viability compared to TCF4 KD1. In control experiments, acute staurosporine-treatment was associated with a robust increase in apoptotic cell death in untransfected SH-SY5Y cells. Although no gross differences in cellular morphology were evident between siRNA-treated cells and controls, condensed pyknotic nuclei were frequently observed in TCF4-depleted cells (Figure S2).

thumbnail
Download:
Figure 3. Knockdown of TCF4 induces apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells.

Cells were treated with siRNAs for 72h after which cell viability and caspase activity were measured (A). In addition to the siRNA treatment groups, untransfected SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to staurosporine (1µM in DMSO) and vehicle for 3h to induce apoptosis. Knockdown of TCF4 leads to a significant reduction in cell viability (P = 2.8x10-16, blue bars). Furthermore, TCF4-knockdown is also associated with an increase in caspase 3/7 activity compared to controls (P = 1.3x10-3, red bars). Although GAPDH knockdown is associated with reduced cell viability and elevated caspase 3/7 activity compared to mock-treated cells, both assays showed statistical significant differences between the control groups (mock and GAPDH) compared to TCF4-knockdown (TCF4 KD1 and KD2) supporting the microarray data. As expected, staurosporine treatment also reduced cell viability and increased caspase 3/7 activity in untransfected cells. Western blot analysis of caspase 3 processing after 72h knockdown shows that caspase 3 cleavage products are detected in siRNA treated cells (B). β-actin was used as a loading control for all treatment groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.g003

Differential expression of genes in the TGF-β signaling and EMT pathways in TCF4-knockdown cells

To refine the analysis of downstream gene expression changes due to TCF4 knockdown, we utilized the MetaCoreTM (GeneGo) analytical suite which provides a manually curated database of “process networks” which detail more specific biological processes than GO annotations alone. In this analysis, the full list of up- and downregulated genes with Entrez IDs (1031 genes) were interrogated to reveal the concerted function of the top differentially expressed genes. This analysis identified a number of cellular processes in TCF4-knockdown cells including TGF-β signaling, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), hedgehog signaling, apoptosis and neurogenesis (Table 3). These data corroborate the findings using DAVID, as process networks relating to apoptosis (“Death Domain receptors and caspases in apoptosis” and “Apoptosis stimulation by external signals”) appeared in the list (Table 3).

CategoryProcess NetworkGenesP valueFDR
Signal TransductionTGF-β, GDF and Activin signalingPTPRK, PTGER2, CREB1, GATA3, CCND1, INHBA, SMAD4, FOS, SP1, SMAD2, HIF1A, ATF2, SMAD7, LEFTY1, MYC, TOB1, NOTCH1, CDK63.54E-040.044*
Signal TransductionBMP and GDF signalingCREB1, MSX2, BMPR1A, AKT1, BMP7, SMAD4, TLE1, ATF2, SMAD7, MYC, NODAL, SOX9, TOB1, CDK68.02E-040.044*
DevelopmentRegulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitionNOTCH1, CREB1, ACTA2, JAK2, BMP7, TRADD, SMAD4, FOS, SP1, SMAD2, HIF1A, ATF2, ABBP1, JAG1, SMAD7, ADAM17, SNAI2, IGF2, TJP1, SOX98.38E-040.044*
DevelopmentRegulation of telomere lengthTINF2, MAX, TEP1, SP1, HNRNPC, MYC, PTGES3, CDK65.35E-030.190
DevelopmentHedgehog signalingNOTCH1, CREB1, HESX1, CCND1, SIRT1, INHBA, AKT1, BMP7, RBX1, SMAD4, ASCL1, ZIC1, SP1, ROCK2, PBX1. CDKN1C, HES1, JAG1, MYC, ADAM17, SOX96.06E-030.190
ApoptosisDeath Domain receptors and caspases in apoptosisNGFRAP1, NGFR, TRADD, CD40, TIMP3, TNFSF10, CASP1, TRAF4, NOD1, PDCD5, CASP3, BIRC8, FAS, CASP4, CARD87.26E-030.190
ApoptosisApoptosis stimulation by external signalsNGFRAP1, JAK2, BID, NGFR, NTRK1, TRADD, SMAD4, TNFSF10, FOS, SMAD2, ADAM17, CASP3, FAS, BID9.66E-030.217
DevelopmentNeurogenesis in generalNOTCH1, CREB1, HESX1, GFRA3, INHBA, RCAN1, ASCL1, ZIC1, PBX1, NEUROG2, HES1, JAG1, ADAM17, CHRM3, MEF2C, SERPINI11.24E-020.237
DNA damageCheckpointYWHAQ, CCND1, TLK2, BRIP1, CCND3, RUVBL2, ATF2, ATF3, RAD1, BARD1, MYC, YWHAZ, CDK61.51E-020.237
Cardiac developmentBMP and TGF-β signalingMSX2, ISL1, BMPR1A, BMP7, SMAD4, PDLIM3, MYH7, SMAD2, SMAD7, NODAL, SNAI2, SOX9, MEF2C1.51E-020.237

Table 3. Process network enrichment in MetaCore.

The Entrez gene IDs derived from the high-confidence list of 1031 differentially expressed genes in TCF4-knockdown cells were analyzed for enrichment using MetaCoreTM. Each term is presented with its functional category, network and corresponding P value. * Pass FDR correction of 0.05.
CSV
Download CSV

Novel terms relating to particular signal transduction pathways and developmental processes were identified using MetaCore (Table 3). Specifically, three process networks passed stringent FDR correction (FDR 0.05). In the signal transduction category we identified process networks associated with “TGF-β, GDF and activin signaling” and “BMP and GDF signaling” to be over-represented. These terms refer to signaling through the TGF-β superfamily of ligands [27]. TGF-β ligands operate through the activation of transmembrane serine–threonine receptor kinases that phosphorylate SMAD proteins to coordinate cell-type specific gene expression. MetaCore analysis revealed that several elements of the TGF-β signaling pathway where differentially expressed after TCF4 knockdown. Differentially expressed genes included two ligands of the TGF-β family (INHBA and BMP7), the BMPR1A receptor, and several of the SMAD proteins (SMAD2, SMAD4, SMAD7), demonstrating that each level of the pathway was affected (Table 4).

GeneFCP valueDescription
TGF-β signaling pathway
BMP7-3.941.34E-04BMP Ligand
BMPR1A2.461.81E-05Tyrosine kinase receptor (BMP)
SMAD2-2.154.38E-04R-SMAD (TGF/Nodal)
SMAD41.494.71E-04co-SMAD
SMAD71.383.97E-04I-SMAD
SMAD61.231.04E-02*I-SMAD
SMAD11.289.59E-03*R-SMAD (BMPR1)
NODAL-1.252.27E-04Ligand (Nodal)
INHBA-2.382.68E-07Ligand (Activin A)
LEFTY1-2.813.37E-04Ligand (Inhibitor of Nodal)
Notch signaling pathway
NOTCH12.401.02E-04Ligand receptor
NOTCH2-1.438.48E-03*Ligand receptor
JAG12.594.61E-04Ligand receptor (inhibitor of Notch)
ADAM171.443.83E-04metallopeptidase (Notch-cleavage)
APH1A1.641.57E-04γ-secretase complex (Notch-cleavage)
HES11.654.67E-05Notch effector
HES7-1.546.40E-03*Notch effector

Table 4. Gene expression changes associated with TGF-β and Notch signaling pathways in TCF4-knockdown cells.

Gene expression changes in manually curated signaling pathways in TCF4-knockdown cells. The data are presented as statistically significant (FDR 0.01) gene expression changes (fold change) for the genes in the TGF-β and Notch signaling pathways. * Pass FDR correction of 0.05.
CSV
Download CSV

The third term that remained statistically significant after FDR correction was in the development category and relates to EMT (Table 3). EMT is a developmental process whereby cells loose their adhesive properties and become more motile. EMT is essential for neural tube formation and is thought to be a key step regulating cancer cell metastasis [28]. Two important EMT regulators, SNAI2 and DEC1 (BHLHB2 in Figure 2A) are differentially expressed in response to TCF4 depletion. SNAI2 promotes EMT and is downregulated in TCF4-knockdown cells whereas DEC1 is upregulated in TCF4-knockdown cells (Figure 2A). It is also noteworthy that differentially expressed genes associated to the EMT category are also of general importance to development as they include elements of the Notch, BMP and IGF signaling pathways.

RT-PCR was used to gain further support for the differential expression of EMT genes in TCF4-depleted cells (Figure S3). These data confirm the gene expression changes detected on the microarray and show that in addition to SNAI2, SNA11 is also downregulated in TCF4-depleted cells. Importantly, expression of the closely related class I bHLH gene TCF3/E47 was unaltered in TCF4-depleted cells suggesting the alterations in the EMT gene expression pathway occurred independently of E47.

The IGF-signaling pathway also appears to be altered in TCF4-depleted SH-SY5Y cells [29]. Specifically, IGF2 and GRB14 are among the most significantly downregulated genes whereas IGFBP5 and the genes encoding other IGF-binding proteins are upregulated in our dataset (Figure 2 and Table 5). These alterations in gene expression are also evident in downstream elements of the IGF-signaling pathway and include down-regulation of several kinases and adaptor molecules such as AKT1 and RPS6KB1 that encodes the p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (Table 5).

GeneFold changeP valueDescription
IGF2-5.222351.52E-06IGF ligand
IGFBP54.906592.35E-05IGF carrier protein
IGFBP31.288341.17E-02*IGF carrier protein
IGFBP42.593483.09E-03*IGF carrier protein
IGFBPL1-1.437558.52E-05
GRB14-3.081261.79E-05Receptor-bound protein (inhibitor)
GRB7-1.225781.95E-04Receptor-bound protein (inhibitor)
PIK3CG-1.753779.67E-03*Signal transduction (kinase)
PIK3CA1.582226.16E-04*Signal transduction (kinase)
PIK3C2B-1.452935.42E-03*Signal transduction (kinase)
PIK3CD-1.305427.37E-03*Signal transduction (kinase)
PDPK1 (PDK1)-1.987478.88E-05AKT inhibition (kinase)
AKT11.360453.53E-04Signal transduction (kinase)
YWHAG-1.97877.64E-05Regulatory co-factor
YWHAZ1.26743.63E-04Regulatory co-factor
FOXO1A1.60643.75E-03*Transcription factor
FOXO3B-1.726563.65E-03*Transcription factor
RPS6KB1 (S6K1)-1.28983.83E-03*Ribosomal subunit kinase
RPS6KC11.783944.15E-03*Ribosomal subunit kinase
RPS6KA31.473676.83E-03*Ribosomal subunit kinase
RPS6KA1-1.328842.57E-03*Ribosomal subunit kinase

Table 5. Gene expression changes associated with the IGF signaling pathway in TCF4-knockdown cells.

Gene expression changes in the manually curated IGF signaling pathway in TCF4-knockdown cells. The data are presented as statistically significant (FDR 0.01) gene expression changes sorted by fold change for the genes in the IGF signaling pathway [29]. * Pass FDR correction of 0.05.
CSV
Download CSV

Altered expression of neurogenic and neurological disease genes in TCF4-depleted cells

One of the initial aims of this study was to identify gene expression changes in neurodevelopmental genes. Accordingly, we found that the proneural genes ASCL1 and NEUROG2 were downregulated in TCF4-depleted cells (Figure 2A). In addition to the proneural genes, a number of genes implicated in rare Mendelian forms of mental retardation were differentially expressed in TCF4 knockdown cells (Table 6). Interestingly, these differentially expressed genes are mutated in disorders that resemble Rett syndrome and have phenotypic similarities to PTHS. For example, MEF2C is found in the top 40 most significantly upregulated genes in TCF4-knockdown cells (Figure 2A). Furthermore, UBE3A (mutated in AS) is downregulated in TCF4 knockdown cells whereas the MWS gene and EMT regulator ZEB2, is upregulated (Table 6).

GeneDiseaseOMIMInheritanceFCP valueReference
TCF4PTHS610954AD-3.102.02 E-05 [9]
MEF2CSyndromic MR613443AD3.731.37 E-05 [50]
UBE3AAS105830imprinted-1.391.56 E-03* [59]
ZEB2MWS235730AD1.483.60 E-03* [60]
FMR1Fragile X syndrome300624X-linked1.941.51 E-02** [61]

Table 6. Altered expression of several mental retardation (MR) genes in TCF4-knockdown cells.

Data presented are the fold change and the corrected P value (FDR 0.01) derived from the microarray. Pass FDR correction of 0.05, pass FDR correction of 0.1. Abbreviations: PTHS, Pitt-Hopkins syndrome; AS, Angelman Syndrome; MWS, Mowat-Wilson syndrome.
CSV
Download CSV

Discussion

It is now well established that rare, highly penetrant TCF4 alleles are associated with neurodevelopmental phenotypes whereas common variants are associated with disorders such as schizophrenia [6–8,13,14]. Recent cognitive and imaging studies have also shown that TCF4 is important for normal brain function [1,15]. However, knowledge of TCF4-regulated genes and pathways in the brain is comparatively sparse. Using genome-wide transcriptional profiling of SH-SY5Y cells where TCF4 was knocked down with siRNAs, we demonstrate that TCF4 reduction affects the expression of genes involved in cell signaling, cell survival and neurodevelopment. By deconstructing the top gene expression changes, we also show that genes controlling apoptosis tend to be upregulated whilst genes that support processes involving non-coding RNA metabolism are downregulated. Process network enrichment analysis also suggests that the TGF-β, Notch and IGF signaling pathways may converge on the EMT pathway in TCF4-depleted cells.

GO enrichment analysis implicates TCF4 in apoptosis and non-coding RNA metabolism

We used several bioinformatics tools to search for processes and pathways that may be altered in TCF4-depleted cells. Initial results from GO term enrichment analysis using DAVID showed that apoptosis and NF-κB signaling were statistically significant processes among the upregulated genes. Shared terms in GO categories between NF-κB signaling and cell death categories show that many of the genes in each pathway are the same, indicating some degree of convergence between NF-κB signaling and apoptosis (Table 2). In neurons, NF-κB regulates the expression of genes participating in seemingly diverse aspects of neurodevelopment, learning and memory [30]. NF-κB signaling has also been implicated in enhancing neuronal apoptosis associated with neurodegenerative disease, brain injury and inflammatory conditions [31]. Similarly in neurons, caspase activation is known to be important for axon pruning and synapse elimination and can mediate some of the chronic neuropathological events associated with brain injury or neurodegeneration [32]. Since acute knockdown of TCF4 over a period of 72h reduced cell viability and increased caspase 3/7 activity, up-regulation of some caspases and components of the NF-κB pathway in TCF4-depleted cells may induce cell death (Figure 3). It is therefore possible that TCF4 may regulate the expression of some caspase genes and other components of the pro-apoptotic signaling pathway in SH-SY5Y cells.

TCF4-knockdown affects genes in the TGF-β signaling pathway

To gain further insight in to TCF4-regulated pathways, we used MetaCore to identify network processes that were altered in TCF4-depleted cells. Enrichment analysis on the top 1031 differentially expressed genes, demonstrated that several components of the TGF-β signaling pathway are affected. Specifically, we found robust down-regulation of the TGF-β superfamily ligands (BMP7, NODAL, LEFTY1 and INHBA) and altered expression of several downstream components of the TGF-β signaling cascade including BMPR1A, and some of the SMAD transcription factors (Table 4). TGF-β signaling regulates many aspects of cell proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis [27]. In the nervous system, TGF-β signaling regulates neural crest formation and in also required for neurogenesis, neurite outgrowth and synaptogenesis [33,34]. Interestingly, Bmp7 regulates the survival and proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the developing neocortex of mice and maintains Ngn2 (the murine orthologue of NEUROG2) in ventricular and subventricular zones of the cortex [35]. Notably, both BMP7 (FC, -3.93) and NEUROG2 (FC, -3.10) are robustly downregulated in TCF4-depleted cells suggesting that TCF4 may coordinately regulate each gene (Figure 2A).

TCF4-knockdown affects EMT regulators

In addition to driving developmental programs, TGF-β signaling is also involved in EMT.

Process network enrichment identified genes in the EMT pathway to be differentially expressed in TCF4-knockdown cells compared to controls (Table 4). This pathway governs the transition between epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes known to be important during development and in cancer metastasis [36]. TGF-β activates SMADs 3 and 4 to transcribe SNAI1 that represses expression of critical epithelial cell genes such as CDH1 (E-cadherin, a commonly used molecular marker of the epithelial phenotype) allowing activated cells to switch to the mesenchymal phenotype [27]. In addition to components of the TGF-β signaling pathway, the EMT regulators SNAI1/2 and DEC1 (BHLHB2 on the array) were differentially expressed in TCF4-knockdown cells (Figure 2A and Figure S3). SNAI1 and 2 are transcriptional repressors that bind to E-boxes in the promoter regions of genes including Cdh1 [37]. Similarly, DEC1 is another transcriptional repressor that regulates EMT in pancreatic cancer cells in response to TGF-β stimulation [38]. Our data are therefore consistent with findings in other cell types showing that the E-proteins TCF4 and E47 are involved in EMT [39–41].

Gene expression changes in the IGF signaling pathway

In addition to changes in gene expression associated with the TGF-β and Nodal signaling, TCF4-knockdown also alters the expression of components of the IGF signaling pathways (Table 5). TCF4-knockdown is associated with a 5.2 fold down-regulation of IGF2 and up-regulation of the genes encoding IGF binding proteins, IGFBP3, -4 and -5 (Figure 2A and Table 5). In the brain, IGF2 is required for memory consolidation and enhancement [42], adult hippocampal neurogenesis [43], synapse formation and dendritic spine maturation [44]. Since IGF2 has a role in learning and memory and PTHS patients have profound intellectual disability [45], TCF4 regulation of IGF2 expression may be a determinant of cognitive dysfunction. IGF1 treatment has been shown to reverse some of the neurophysiological abnormalities in a mouse model of Rett Syndrome lacking methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (Mecp2 [46]). Because IGF1 and IGF2 activate the same receptor, IGF2 may have some utility in reversing some of the cognitive deficits in PTHS patients. Another component of the IGF pathway RPS6KB1 (encoding a member of the ribosomal protein S6 kinase family), is also downregulated in TCF4-depleted cells (Table 5). RPS6KB1 may be particularly important in the context of neurodevelopment because genetic ablation of this gene rescues multiple physiological and behavioural phenotypes in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome, caused by aberrant synaptic translation [47].

Altered expression of neurodevelopmental genes in TCF4-knockdown cells

ASCL1 and NEUROG2 are important neurogenic bHLH transcription factors that interact directly with TCF4 and appear among the top downregulated genes in TCF-depleted cells (Figure 2A and Table 2 respectively). Since both of these proneural genes are downregulated, this may indicate that as well as regulating proneural activity through protein: protein interactions, TCF4 may also regulate proneural gene expression. In addition to ASCL1 and NEUROG2, other neurodevelopmental transcriptional regulators such as, MEF2C (syndromic mental retardation) and ZEB2 (MWS) were also differentially expressed in TCF4-depleted cells.

PTHS, MWS and AS are sometimes classified as Rett-like syndromes because of their similar clinical presentation and genetics [9,48]. Furthermore, haploinsufficiency of MEF2C also results in a form of severe mental retardation, with absent speech, hypotonia and epilepsy [49,50]. Importantly, we found that the genes for each of these phenotypically similar disorders (MEF2C, ZEB2 and UBE3A) were differentially expressed in TCF4-depleted cells (Table 6). From a mechanistic perspective, TCF4, ZEB2 and MEF2C can all regulate gene expression at E-boxes in the promoter regions of certain genes [51,52]. These data, allied with the phenotypic overlap between these disorders, suggest that each of these genes may participate in a similar neurodevelopmental transcriptional pathway. Thus, alterations in the activity or levels of TCF4 as seen in PTHS, autism and possibly schizophrenia, may be associated with dysregulation of several transcription factors that control neurodevelopmental gene expression programs at E-box containing promoters.

In summary, microarray analysis of SH-SY5Y cells where TCF4 has been acutely knocked down with siRNAs identifies gene expression changes in pathways associated with apoptosis, signaling, EMT and neurodevelopment. These data provide an important insight in to the cellular processes that are regulated by TCF4. Our data also suggest a novel shared mechanism in a subset of neurodevelopmental disorders that regulate aspects of normal brain function and may also contribute to the molecular pathology of common diseases such as autism and schizophrenia.

Methods

RNA interference and transfection

27 mer RNA oligonucleotide duplexes were designed using predictive algorithms (siDESIGN Center, http://www.thermoscientificbio.com/design-center/; siMAXTM Design Tool, http://www.eurofinsdna.com) and were selected for their predicted efficacy scores and homology to regions of interest. Two duplexes (KD1 (exon 12), 5’-GGGACAGACAGUAUAAUGGCAAAUAGA; KD2 (exon19), 5’-AUAAUGACGAUGAGGACCUGACACCAG) were designed to target constitutive exons found in all the published human TCF4 transcripts [19]. The GAPDH siRNA 5’- CGGAGUCAACGGAUUUGGUCGUAUUGG was used in control experiments to identify transcripts that were altered by RNA interference having minimal off-target affects. siRNAs (Eurofins MWG Operon) were stored as a 50mM stock in siMAX Universal Buffer (30mM HEPES, 100mM KCl, 1mM MgCl2; pH 7.3) at -80°C.

SH-SY5Y (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum (FCS, PAA laboratories) without antibiotics. 24h after seeding, cells were transfected with the different siRNA duplexes (TCF4 KD1 and KD2, GAPDH or mock) using Lipofectamine® RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 10nM. 48h after the first transfection the cells were re-transfected using the same conditions. The following day (72h after the first transfection), RNA and protein were prepared from each experimental condition. Each transfection was performed in quadruplicate and three biological replicates were used for gene expression analysis whilst the remaining sample was used for western blotting.

Western blotting

For quantitation of protein levels after siRNA treatment, transfected SH-SY5Y cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and the resulting lysates were clarified by centrifugation. 10µg of each lysate was separated on a 12% gel polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose as described previously [53]. Membranes were blocked overnight in blocking buffer (5% (w/v) milk powder in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBST)) and then incubated with anti-TCF4 (Abnova) and anti-α-tubulin antibodies (12G10, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, The University of Iowa) diluted in blocking buffer. After extensive washing in TBST, blots were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody prior to imaging on a LI-COR Odyssey infrared scanner. Proteins levels were quantified using the Odyssey software version 2.1 as described previously [54,55].

Quantitative and reverse transcriptase PCR (qPCR and RT-PCR)

RNA was extracted from siRNA-treated cells using RNeasy Plus Mini Kits (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was treated with Ambion® TURBO DNA-free™ DNase I (Invitrogen) before being converted to cDNA using the ProtoScript® M-MuLV First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (NEB). Triplicate 25µl qPCR reactions were prepared on a Corbett robot (Corbett Robotics CAS1200/QIAGEN) using 10ng of cDNA as a template, SensiMixTM SYBR No-ROX (Bioline) and an optimized concentration of gene-specific primers. qPCR was then performed on a Qiagen Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Robotics/QIAGEN). GAPDH, TCF4 and 18S primer efficiencies were all optimized prior to use on experimental samples. Gene expression was quantified using the ΔCT method and 18S rRNA as an internal control. Primer sequences are listed in Table S1A.

TaqMan® gene expression assays were used to validate gene expression changes (NOTCH1, FAS, CASP8, CASP1, NTRK1, NEUROG2, CDK6, BMP7, IGF2 and CDKN1C) after knockdown using pre-optimized reagents (Table S1B). Briefly, 1-10ng of cDNA was used as template in 20µl reactions with the TaqMan® Fast Advanced Master Mix depending on transcript abundance (Applied Biosystems/Life technologies). All samples were run in triplicate according to the Fast Advanced Master Mix protocol using the ABI 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems/Life technologies). Results were then analyzed on the RQ Manager 1.2 (Applied Biosystems/Life technologies). All genes were normalized to 18S rRNA using the ΔCT method. To calculate fold change, the relative transcript abundance from mock and GAPDH KD samples were pooled and compared to the values of pooled KD1 and KD2 samples. A two-tailed t-test was performed on these two groups to determine statistical significance.

For semi-quantitative RT-PCR, 10ng of cDNA was amplified (30 cycles) in a 25µl reaction with REDTaq® DNA Polymerase according to manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma). The sequences of the gene-specific primer pairs are listed in Table S1C. 20µl of the PCR reaction was separated on a 2.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. PCR products were imaged with a GelDoc-It® TS Imaging System (UVP).

Toray Microarray

Three biological replicates from four treatment groups (TCF4 KD1and KD2, GAPDH KD and mock) were sent for microarray analysis (Central Biotechnology Services, School of Medicine, Cardiff University). Briefly, the RNA concentration and quality was assessed on a RNA Nano Chip using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies). RNA was labeled, fragmented then hybridized to 3D-gene Human Oligo chip 25 k (Toray Industries Inc., Japan). Chips were scanned three times at different intensities and normalized. The resulting signal intensity data was then analyzed in-house. Data was imported into Partek Genomics Suite 6.6 (Partek Inc.) and analyzed. As there were only three replicates in each group, probe sets with more than one missing value in any group were removed from the analysis. A one-way ANOVA comparing control (mock and GAPDH) and TCF4 knockdown (KD1, KD2) groups was then performed to identify differentially expressed genes. A false discovery rate (FDR) was used to correct for multiple testing (FDR < 0.01, 1204 differentially expressed genes; FDR < 0.05, 5374 differentially expressed genes). The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [56] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE48367 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE48367).

Enrichment Analysis

The Entrez Gene IDs from the high confidence (FDR 0.01, 1031 IDs) gene list was used as the initial dataset for enrichment analysis. In addition, a background list consisting of Entrez Gene IDs from all genes detected by the microarray was also generated (18966 IDs). Biological process GO term enrichment (GOTERM_BP_FAT) was performed using DAVID v 6.7 [26]. 425 upregulated and 606 downregulated genes were analyzed separately using the same background list. Process Network term enrichment was performed using MetaCoreTM (GeneGo, Thomson Reuters). Here, the full FDR corrected list (1031 IDs) was uploaded and compared to the background list of genes. An FDR cut off of 0.05 was used to determine significant enrichment from both analyses. Manually curated pathways were annotated using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) Pathways and WikiGenes (http://www.wikigenes.org) web resources [57,58]. Please note that we have used the HGNC (Human Genome Nomenclature Committee) nomenclature for each gene but provide common synonyms for some of the genes that were followed up in this study.

Cell viability and caspase assays

SH-SY5Y cells were plated in 96 well plates and treated with the appropriate siRNAs for 72h as described above. Cell viability and caspase 3/7 activation were measured in the same plate using the CellTiter-Fluor™ Cell Viability (Promega) and the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 (Promega) assays. Staurosporine-treated (1µM in DMSO, 3h at 37°C) SH-SY5Y cells were used as a positive control for each assay. Cell viability was measured in 24 replicates of each condition whereas 12 biological replicates were used to assay caspase 3/7 activity. The data were normalized to the levels in the mock-transfected cells, nominally 100%, and represented as the mean and standard error. T-tests were used to compare treatment groups. In addition to the microplate assays, caspase 3 cleavage was assessed by western blotting. After treatment, dead cells were collected from the media by centrifugation and lysed with the remaining live cells. 15μg of each lysate was used for western blotting with a caspase 3 (#9662, Cell Signaling) and β-actin (AC-15, Sigma) antibodies.

Immunocytochemistry

SH-SY5Y cells were processed for immunocytochemistry as described previously [53,54]. Briefly, siRNA-treated cells grown on coverslips were fixed in 4% (v/v) formaldehyde, permeabilised with 0.01% (v/v) Triton-X100 and blocked with 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum. Cells were labeled at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (165nM, Invitrogen), Hoechst (1µg/ml, Invitrogen) and an anti-TCF4 polyclonal antibody (Covalab, UK) for 1h followed by Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) for a further 30min. After washing in PBS, coverslips were mounted in Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc.) and images were captured on a Leica SP2 confocal microscope using a 63X oil immersion objective lens. Images were assembled using Adobe Photoshop CS4 and only adjusted for brightness and contrast.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Hierarchical clustering of the top differentially expressed genes. The top 1204 differentially expressed genes (FDR 0.01) cluster by treatment group as evident from the dendrogram to left of the heatmap. Samples from the control treatments (mock and GAPDH KD) and TCF4 KD treatment (KD1 and KD2) are shown to cluster into defined groups (white and black respectively). The top section of the heat map displays differential expression relative to controls: up-regulated genes are shown in red while down-regulated genes are coloured blue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.s001

(EPS)

Figure S2.

Cellular imaging of siRNA-treated SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were treated with siRNAs for 72h as described above. Fixed cells were stained with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (F-actin), Hoescht-33342 (nuclei) and with an anti-TCF4 polyclonal antibody. Although there is a marked reduction in TCF4 immunoreactivity in TCF4 KD cells, no apparent morphological differences are observed between treatment groups after 3 days knockdown. A few condensed pyknotic nuclei, indicative of apoptosis were observed after TCF4 KD treatment (arrow heads).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis of EMT-regulating transcription factors in TCF4-knockdown cells. RT-PCR was used to confirm differential expression of several transcription factors that drive EMT. SNAI1 and SNAI2 transcripts are down-regulated in TCF4-knockdown cells whereas BHLHE40 (DEC1) and MEF2C transcripts are up-regulated. These data also show that TCF3/E47 transcripts, which encode a paralogue of TCF4 that is required for EMT, are unaltered in TCF4-depleted cells. Note that alterations in SNAI1 were not evident on the microarray possibly due to its low expression in SH-SY5Y cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.s003

(TIF)

Table S1.

Primer sequences and TaqMan probes.

(A) qPCR primers used for knockdown quantification (SYBR Green).

(B) TaqMan probe IDs used for microarray validation.

(C) Primers used for semi-quantitative RT-PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073169.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dominic Sweeney and Ria Chapman for help with the cellular assays and statistical analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MPF DJB. Performed the experiments: MPF. Analyzed the data: MPF AJW EMR DJB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AJW. Wrote the manuscript: MPF EMR DJB.

References

  1. 1. Navarrete K, Pedroso I, De Jong S, Stefansson H, Steinberg S et al. (2013) TCF4 (e2-2; ITF2): A schizophrenia-associated gene with pleiotropic effects on human disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 162: 1-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32109. PubMed: 23129290.
  2. 2. Reizis B (2010) Regulation of plasmacytoid dendritic cell development. Curr Opin Immunol 22: 206-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.005. PubMed: 20144853.
  3. 3. Murre C (2005) Helix-loop-helix proteins and lymphocyte development. Nat Immunol 6: 1079-1086. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1260. PubMed: 16239924.
  4. 4. Henthorn P, Kiledjian M, Kadesch T (1990) Two distinct transcription factors that bind the immunoglobulin enhancer microE5/kappa 2 motif. Science 247: 467-470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2105528. PubMed: 2105528.
  5. 5. Flora A, Garcia JJ, Thaller C, Zoghbi HY (2007) The E-protein Tcf4 interacts with Math1 to regulate differentiation of a specific subset of neuronal progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 15382-15387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707456104. PubMed: 17878293.
  6. 6. Zweier C, Peippo MM, Hoyer J, Sousa S, Bottani A et al. (2007) Haploinsufficiency of TCF4 causes syndromal mental retardation with intermittent hyperventilation (Pitt-Hopkins syndrome). Am J Hum Genet 80: 994-1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/515583. PubMed: 17436255.
  7. 7. Amiel J, Rio M, de Pontual L, Redon R, Malan V et al. (2007) Mutations in TCF4, encoding a class I basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, are responsible for Pitt-Hopkins syndrome, a severe epileptic encephalopathy associated with autonomic dysfunction. Am J Hum Genet 80: 988-993. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/515582. PubMed: 17436254.
  8. 8. Brockschmidt A, Todt U, Ryu S, Hoischen A, Landwehr C et al. (2007) Severe mental retardation with breathing abnormalities (Pitt-Hopkins syndrome) is caused by haploinsufficiency of the neuronal bHLH transcription factor TCF4. Hum Mol Genet 16: 1488-1494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddm099. PubMed: 17478476.
  9. 9. Peippo M, Ignatius J (2012) Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome. Mol Syndromol 2: 171-180. PubMed: 22670138.
  10. 10. Sepp M, Pruunsild P, Timmusk T (2012) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome-associated mutations in TCF4 lead to variable impairment of the transcription factor function ranging from hypomorphic to dominant-negative effects. Hum Mol Genet 21: 2873-2888. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/dds112. PubMed: 22460224.
  11. 11. Forrest M, Chapman RM, Doyle AM, Tinsley CL, Waite A et al. (2012) Functional analysis of TCF4 missense mutations that cause Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Hum Mutat 33: 1676-1686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22160. PubMed: 22777675.
  12. 12. de Pontual L, Mathieu Y, Golzio C, Rio M, Malan V et al. (2009) Mutational, functional, and expression studies of the TCF4 gene in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Hum Mutat 30: 669-676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20935. PubMed: 19235238.
  13. 13. Talkowski ME, Rosenfeld JA, Blumenthal I, Pillalamarri V, Chiang C et al. (2012) Sequencing chromosomal abnormalities reveals neurodevelopmental loci that confer risk across diagnostic boundaries. Cell 149: 525-537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.028. PubMed: 22521361.
  14. 14. Stefansson H, Ophoff RA, Steinberg S, Andreassen OA, Cichon S et al. (2009) Common variants conferring risk of schizophrenia. Nature 460: 744-747. PubMed: 19571808.
  15. 15. Blake DJ, Forrest M, Chapman RM, Tinsley CL, O’Donovan MC et al. (2010) TCF4, schizophrenia, and Pitt-Hopkins Syndrome. Schizophr Bull 36: 443-447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbq035. PubMed: 20421335.
  16. 16. Zhu X, Gu H, Liu Z, Xu Z, Chen X et al. (2013) Associations between TCF4 gene polymorphism and cognitive functions in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Neuropsychopharmacology 38: 683-689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.234. PubMed: 23249814.
  17. 17. Quednow BB, Ettinger U, Mössner R, Rujescu D, Giegling I et al. (2011) The schizophrenia risk allele C of the TCF4 rs9960767 polymorphism disrupts sensorimotor gating in schizophrenia spectrum and healthy volunteers. J Neurosci 31: 6684-6691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0526-11.2011. PubMed: 21543597.
  18. 18. Wirgenes KV, Sønderby IE, Haukvik UK, Mattingsdal M, Tesli M et al. (2012) TCF4 sequence variants and mRNA levels are associated with neurodevelopmental characteristics in psychotic disorders. Transl Psychiatry 2: e112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2012.39. PubMed: 22832956.
  19. 19. Sepp M, Kannike K, Eesmaa A, Urb M, Timmusk T (2011) Functional diversity of human basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor TCF4 isoforms generated by alternative 5' exon usage and splicing. PLOS ONE 6: e22138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022138. PubMed: 21789225.
  20. 20. Liu Y, Ray SK, Yang XQ, Luntz-Leybman V, Chiu IM (1998) A splice variant of E2-2 basic helix-loop-helix protein represses the brain-specific fibroblast growth factor 1 promoter through the binding to an imperfect E-box. J Biol Chem 273: 19269-19276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.30.19269. PubMed: 9668116.
  21. 21. Massari ME, Murre C (2000) Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms. Mol Cell Biol 20: 429-440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.2.429-440.2000. PubMed: 10611221.
  22. 22. Brzózka MM, Radyushkin K, Wichert SP, Ehrenreich H, Rossner MJ (2010) Cognitive and sensorimotor gating impairments in transgenic mice overexpressing the schizophrenia susceptibility gene Tcf4 in the brain. Biol Psychiatry 68: 33-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.026. PubMed: 20434134.
  23. 23. Bertrand N, Castro DS, Guillemot F (2002) Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 517-530. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn874. PubMed: 12094208.
  24. 24. Powell LM, Jarman AP (2008) Context dependence of proneural bHLH proteins. Curr Opin Genet Dev 18: 411-417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2008.07.012. PubMed: 18722526.
  25. 25. Li S, Mattar P, Zinyk D, Singh K, Chaturvedi CP et al. (2012) GSK3 temporally regulates neurogenin 2 proneural activity in the neocortex. J Neurosci 32: 7791-7805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1309-12.2012. PubMed: 22674256.
  26. 26. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44-57. PubMed: 19131956.
  27. 27. Massagué J (2012) TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13: 616-630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3434. PubMed: 22992590.
  28. 28. Acloque H, Adams MS, Fishwick K, Bronner-Fraser M, Nieto MA (2009) Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: the importance of changing cell state in development and disease. J Clin Invest 119: 1438-1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38019. PubMed: 19487820.
  29. 29. Fernandez AM, Torres-Alemán I (2012) The many faces of insulin-like peptide signalling in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 225-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3209. PubMed: 22430016.
  30. 30. Gutierrez H, Davies AM (2011) Regulation of neural process growth, elaboration and structural plasticity by NF-kappaB. Trends Neurosci 34: 316-325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.03.001. PubMed: 21459462.
  31. 31. Qin ZH, Tao LY, Chen X (2007) Dual roles of NF-kappaB in cell survival and implications of NF-kappaB inhibitors in neuroprotective therapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin 28: 1859-1872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00741.x. PubMed: 18031598.
  32. 32. Hyman BT, Yuan J (2012) Apoptotic and non-apoptotic roles of caspases in neuronal physiology and pathophysiology. Nat Rev Neurosci 13: 395-406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3228. PubMed: 22595785.
  33. 33. Bond AM, Bhalala OG, Kessler JA (2012) The dynamic role of bone morphogenetic proteins in neural stem cell fate and maturation. Dev Neurobiol 72: 1068-1084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22022. PubMed: 22489086.
  34. 34. Panchision DM, Pickel JM, Studer L, Lee SH, Turner PA et al. (2001) Sequential actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell production and fate. Genes Dev 15: 2094-2110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.894701. PubMed: 11511541.
  35. 35. Segklia A, Seuntjens E, Elkouris M, Tsalavos S, Stappers E et al. (2012) Bmp7 regulates the survival, proliferation, and neurogenic properties of neural progenitor cells during corticogenesis in the mouse. PLOS ONE 7: e34088. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034088. PubMed: 22461901.
  36. 36. Nieto MA (2011) The ins and outs of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in health and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27: 347-376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154036. PubMed: 21740232.
  37. 37. Cobaleda C, Pérez-Caro M, Vicente-Dueñas C, Sánchez-García I (2007) Function of the zinc-finger transcription factor SNAI2 in cancer and development. Annu Rev Genet 41: 41-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130146. PubMed: 17550342.
  38. 38. Wu Y, Sato F, Yamada T, Bhawal UK, Kawamoto T et al. (2012) The BHLH transcription factor DEC1 plays an important role in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer. Int J Oncol 41: 1337-1346. PubMed: 22825629.
  39. 39. Sobrado VR, Moreno-Bueno G, Cubillo E, Holt LJ, Nieto MA et al. (2009) The class I bHLH factors E2-2A and E2-2B regulate EMT. J Cell Sci 122: 1014-1024. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.028241. PubMed: 19295128.
  40. 40. Moreno-Bueno G, Cubillo E, Sarrió D, Peinado H, Rodríguez-Pinilla SM et al. (2006) Genetic profiling of epithelial cells expressing E-cadherin repressors reveals a distinct role for Snail, Slug, and E47 factors in epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res 66: 9543-9556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0479. PubMed: 17018611.
  41. 41. Bolós V, Peinado H, Pérez-Moreno MA, Fraga MF, Esteller M et al. (2003) The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors. J Cell Sci 116: 499-511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00224. PubMed: 12508111.
  42. 42. Chen DY, Stern SA, Garcia-Osta A, Saunier-Rebori B, Pollonini G et al. (2011) A critical role for IGF-II in memory consolidation and enhancement. Nature 469: 491-497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09667. PubMed: 21270887.
  43. 43. Bracko O, Singer T, Aigner S, Knobloch M, Winner B et al. (2012) Gene expression profiling of neural stem cells and their neuronal progeny reveals IGF2 as a regulator of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J Neurosci 32: 3376-3387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-11.2012. PubMed: 22399759.
  44. 44. Schmeisser MJ, Baumann B, Johannsen S, Vindedal GF, Jensen V et al. (2012) IkappaB kinase/nuclear factor kappa B-dependent insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) expression regulates synapse formation and spine maturation via Igf2 receptor signaling. J Neurosci 32: 5688-5703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0111-12.2012. PubMed: 22514330.
  45. 45. Van Balkom ID, Vuijk PJ, Franssens M, Hoek HW, Hennekam RC (2012) Development, cognition, and behaviour in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 54: 925-931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04339.x. PubMed: 22712893.
  46. 46. Tropea D, Giacometti E, Wilson NR, Beard C, McCurry C et al. (2009) Partial reversal of Rett Syndrome-like symptoms in MeCP2 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2029-2034. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812394106. PubMed: 19208815.
  47. 47. Bhattacharya A, Kaphzan H, Alvarez-Dieppa AC, Murphy JP, Pierre P et al. (2012) Genetic removal of p70 S6 kinase 1 corrects molecular, synaptic, and behavioral phenotypes in fragile X syndrome mice. Neuron 76: 325-337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.022. PubMed: 23083736.
  48. 48. Armani R, Archer H, Clarke A, Vasudevan P, Zweier C et al. (2012) Transcription factor 4 and myocyte enhancer factor 2C mutations are not common causes of Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 158A: 713-719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.34206. PubMed: 22383159.
  49. 49. Le Meur N, Holder-Espinasse M, Jaillard S, Goldenberg A, Joriot S et al. (2010) MEF2C haploinsufficiency caused by either microdeletion of the 5q14.3 region or mutation is responsible for severe mental retardation with stereotypic movements, epilepsy and/or cerebral malformations. J Med Genet 47: 22-29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2009.069732. PubMed: 19592390.
  50. 50. Zweier M, Rauch A (2012) The MEF2C-Related and 5q14.3q15 Microdeletion Syndrome. Mol Syndromol 2: 164-170. PubMed: 22670137.
  51. 51. Remacle JE, Kraft H, Lerchner W, Wuytens G, Collart C et al. (1999) New mode of DNA binding of multi-zinc finger transcription factors: deltaEF1 family members bind with two hands to two target sites. EMBO J 18: 5073-5084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.18.5073. PubMed: 10487759.
  52. 52. Molkentin JD, Olson EN (1996) Combinatorial control of muscle development by basic helix-loop-helix and MADS-box transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 9366-9373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.18.9366. PubMed: 8790335.
  53. 53. Esapa CT, Waite A, Locke M, Benson MA, Kraus M et al. (2007) SGCE missense mutations that cause myoclonus-dystonia syndrome impair epsilon-sarcoglycan trafficking to the plasma membrane: modulation by ubiquitination and torsinA. Hum Mol Genet 16: 327-342. PubMed: 17200151.
  54. 54. Waite A, De Rosa MC, Brancaccio A, Blake DJ (2011) A gain-of-glycosylation mutation associated with myoclonus-dystonia syndrome affects trafficking and processing of mouse epsilon-sarcoglycan in the late secretory pathway. Hum Mutat 32: 1246-1258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21561. PubMed: 21796726.
  55. 55. Locke M, Tinsley CL, Benson MA, Blake DJ (2009) TRIM32 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for dysbindin. Hum Mol Genet 18: 2344-2358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddp167. PubMed: 19349376.
  56. 56. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE (2002) Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 207-210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.207. PubMed: 11752295.
  57. 57. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M (2004) The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D277-D280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh063. PubMed: 14681412.
  58. 58. Hoffmann R (2008) A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters. Nat Genet 40: 1047-1051. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.f.217. PubMed: 18728691.
  59. 59. Mabb AM, Judson MC, Zylka MJ, Philpot BD (2011) Angelman syndrome: insights into genomic imprinting and neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Trends Neurosci 34: 293-303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.04.001. PubMed: 21592595.
  60. 60. Garavelli L, Mainardi PC (2007) Mowat-Wilson syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2: 42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-2-42. PubMed: 17958891.
  61. 61. Bhakar AL, Dölen G, Bear MF (2012) The pathophysiology of fragile X (and what it teaches us about synapses). Annu Rev Neurosci 35: 417-443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153138. PubMed: 22483044.