Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder caused by a combination of events impairing normal neuronal function. Here we found a molecular bridge between key elements of primary and secondary pathogenic events in AD, namely the elements of the amyloid cascade and synaptic dysfunction associated with the glutamatergic system. In fact, we report that synapse-associated protein-97 (SAP97), a protein involved in dynamic trafficking of proteins to the excitatory synapse, is responsible for driving ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10, the most accredited candidate for α-secretase) to the postsynaptic membrane, by a direct interaction through its Src homology 3 domain. NMDA receptor activation mediates this event and positively modulates α-secretase activity. Furthermore, perturbing ADAM10/SAP97 association in vivo by cell-permeable peptides impairs ADAM10 localization in postsynaptic membranes and consequently decreases the physiological amyloid precursor protein (APP) metabolism. Our findings indicate that glutamatergic synapse activation through NMDA receptor promotes the non-amyloidogenic APP cleavage, strengthening the correlation between APP metabolism and synaptic plasticity.
Introduction
Molecular pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), is the result of a complex interplay of several crossing pathways, involving primary and secondary events (Bossy-Wetzel et al., 2004).
In the case of AD, accumulating evidence indicates the amyloid cascade as the primary pathogenic event (Selkoe, 2000). The production of amyloid β (Aβ) is mediated by the concerted action of two different secretases, namely β-secretase (BACE) (Vassar et al., 1999) and γ-secretase (De Strooper et al., 1998), showing a proteolytic action on the amyloid precursor protein (APP). Alternatively, APP can be subjected to the proteolytic cleavage by α-secretase [whose most accredited candidate is ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10)] (Lammich et al., 1999; Postina et al., 2004), which occurs within the sequence of Aβ, thus precluding the formation of the amyloidogenic fragments. These two processes are differentially segregated within the cells, being α-secretase activity localized in the trans-Golgi network or at the plasma membrane (Lammich et al., 1999; Gutwein et al., 2003), whereas BACE activity is mainly confined to the endoplasmic reticulum and the endosomal/lysosomal system (Kinoshita et al., 2003). Hence, the mechanism that regulates intracellular localization and trafficking to the neuronal membrane of the APP and secretases is central for AD pathogenesis.
Besides these processes, defined as primary pathogenic events in AD, synaptic abnormalities involving inhibitory and excitatory neurons occurring early in the course of the disease have been described (Selkoe, 2002). Among others, the glutamatergic circuitry has been shown to be implicated in the early phases of AD, and this is reflected in a loss of synaptic plasticity (Gylys et al., 2004).
At a molecular level, the glutamatergic synapse is characterized by a complex and finely tuned network of protein–protein interactions defining both the presynaptic cytomatrix (Garner et al., 2000) and the postsynaptic density (PSD) (Kim and Sheng, 2004). The PSD is a highly organized biochemical organelle that segregates, in a highly ordered array, membrane receptors and signaling elements clustered through a family of linker proteins, i.e., the membrane associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK). MAGUKs are characterized by a common multimodular motif including three PDZ (PSD-95/Discs large/zona occludens-1) domains, an Src homology domain 3 (SH3), and a guanylate kinase-like domain (Kim and Sheng, 2004). Among MAGUKs, synapse-associated protein-97 (SAP97) has been described to be involved in ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) trafficking (Gardoni et al., 2003; Mauceri et al., 2004). Interestingly, in AD brains, a reduced interaction between SAP97 and GluR1 subunits of AMPA receptor has been reported, suggesting a deficiency in SAP97 functioning in AD pathogenesis (Wakabayashi et al., 1999).
Here, we asked whether there would be a molecular link between key elements of primary pathogenic events, i.e., the amyloid cascade, and of secondary pathogenic events in AD, namely synaptic loss associated to the glutamatergic system. Thus, we checked for a link between SAP97, involved in the dynamic trafficking of key elements to the excitatory postsynaptic membrane, and the elements of the amyloid cascade. The results obtained demonstrate a clear interaction between ADAM10 and SAP97 that is instrumental for the intracellular localization and the activity of α-secretase.
Materials and Methods
Antibodies, DNA constructs, and cell-permeable peptide.
The following antibodies were used: monoclonal antibody (mAb) 22C11 (raised against N-terminal domain of APP), mAb 4G8 [against 17–24 amino acids (aa) of Aβ], mAb anti-α-calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase (CaMKII), and polyclonal antibody (pAb) anti-NR2A/B were purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA); pAb anti-SAP97, pAb anti-SAP102, pAb anti-BACE, and mAb anti-PSD-95 were purchased from Affinity BioReagents (Golden, CO); mAb anti-SAP97 was from Stressgen Biotechnologies (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada); pAb anti-ADAM10 and pAb anti-actin were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); mAb anti-hemagglutinin (HA) and anti-synaptophysin were purchased from Roche (Mannheim, Germany); pAb APP Ab-2, raised against 1–10 aa of Aβ, was from Lab Vision (Fremont, CA); pAb guinea pig Shank was a gift from M. Sheng (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA); pAb anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and AlexaFluor 488, 555, and 633 secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA); and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies from Pierce (Rockford, IL).
The stop codon resulting in the SAP97 construct (aa 547) was introduced using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), to obtain SAP97547.
Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide was obtained by linking the 11 aa human immunodeficiency virus Tat transporter sequence to the 21 aa sequence (Aarts et al., 2002) corresponding to ADAM10 proline rich domains (NH2-YGRKKRRQRRRPKLPPPKPLPGTLKRRRPPQP-COOH), Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (NH2-YGRKKRRQRRRAKLAAAKALAGTLKRRRAAQA-COOH) in which all proline residues were mutated into alanine was used as negative control. The peptides were synthesized and labeled with fluorescein at the N-terminal region by Primm (Milan, Italy).
Determination of Aβ42 release.
For the evaluation of Aβ42 released from control (C) and treated cells into the cell media, an ELISA kit was used (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan). The test was performed as indicated in the instructions of the manufacturer: a standard curve ranging from 1 to 100 pmol/L was obtained with each point corresponding to the average of two measurements. The release of Aβ42 was evaluated by reference to the standard curve.
Cloning, expression, and purification of glutathione S-transferase fusion protein.
SAP97 fragments or ADAM10 cytosolic tail were subcloned downstream of glutathione S-transferase (GST) in the BaMHI and HindIII sites of the expression plasmid pGEX–KG by PCR using the Pfu polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). GST-fusion proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli, purified on glutathione agarose beads (Sigma) as described previously (Gardoni et al., 2001).
Cell cultures and transfection.
Hippocampal neuronal cultures were prepared from embryonic day 18 (E18) to E19 rat hippocampi as described previously (Gardoni et al., 2002). Neurons were transfected using the calcium phosphate precipitation method at 10 d in vitro (DIV). COS-7 cells were transiently transfected by Superfect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) with cDNA expression constructs (1.5–2 μg of DNA per well) for 2–3 h at 5% CO2, 37°C, and, afterward, cells were washed twice with PBS. COS-7 cells were grown for 24 h before fixation for immunocytochemistry.
Soluble APPα and C-terminal fragments detection.
To detect soluble APPα (sAPPα) released from hippocampal neurons, neuronal cultures were incubated in HBSS (Sigma), and cell media were desalted by using DG10 columns (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), lyophilized, resuspended in sample buffer, and analyzed by Western blot (WB) with polyclonal APP Ab-2 antibody. The evaluation of sAPPα was achieved by loading the total lyophilisate and normalizing the optical density to the total proteins. Inhibition of ADAM10 was performed by incubation with 15 nm tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) (Calbiochem, Nottingham, UK) for 1 h.
To analyze APP C-terminal fragments (CTFs), Triton X-100-insoluble fractions (TIF) proteins were separated by 15% Tris-tricine SDS-PAGE, and WB analysis was performed with 4G8 antibody.
Immunofluorescence labeling, image acquisition.
Hippocampal neurons or transfected COS-7 cells were fixed in 100% methanol at −20°C for 15 min. Primary and secondary antibodies were applied in GDB buffer (30 mm phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.2% gelatin, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 0.8 m NaCl) (Sala et al., 2001). Fluorescence images were acquired using Bio-Rad Radiance 2100 confocal microscope. Confocal images were obtained using a Nikon (Tokyo, Japan) 60× objective with sequential acquisition setting at 1024 × 1024 pixels resolution. Each image was a z-series projection of ∼8–12 images taken at 0.5 μm depth intervals.
PSD preparation.
PSD from mouse brains were purified as described previously (Gardoni et al., 2001).
Immunoprecipitation.
Aliquots of either Tat-ProADAM10709–729 peptide or Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (10 μm, 2 h) treated neurons homogenate, human cortex homogenate, mouse brain homogenate, or PSD were incubated in RIA buffer (200 mm NaCl, 10 mm EDTA, 10 mm Na2HPO4, 0.5% NP-40, and 0.1% SDS) in a final volume of 200 μl with antibody against ADAM10 (Sigma) overnight at 4°C. Protein A-agarose beads were added, and incubation was continued for 2 h, at room temperature, with shaking. The beads were washed three times with RIA buffer. Sample buffer for SDS-PAGE was added, and the mixture was heated for 3 min. Beads were collected by centrifugation, and a volume of supernatants was applied onto 6% SDS-PAGE; immunocomplex precipitation was revealed by monoclonal anti-SAP97, polyclonal anti-SAP102, or pAb anti-NR2A/B antibodies.
Pull-down assay.
Aliquots of PSD were diluted with TBS (10 mm Tris and 150 mm NaCl) and 0.1% SDS to a final volume of 1 ml and incubated (1 h, 37°C) with glutathione agarose beads saturated with fusion proteins or GST alone. After the incubation period, the beads were extensively washed with TBS and 0.1% Triton X-100. Bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblot analysis with polyclonal anti-SAP97 or ADAM10 antibodies.
Neuronal cultures treatment, TIF preparation, and surface expression assay.
Hippocampal neuronal cultures at 14 DIV were incubated in HBSS (Sigma) in the presence or absence of 50 μm NMDA (Sigma). Cell viability was evaluated immediately after the treatment by the 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, as described previously (Gardoni et al., 2002). TIFs were isolated from neurons as described previously (Gardoni et al., 2001). Cross-linking experiments by means of bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) (Pierce) were performed as described previously (Hall and Soderling, 1997; Mauceri et al., 2004).
Lentiviral vectors preparation.
For the small interfering RNA (siRNA) expressing lentivirus vector, an RNA interference stem loop (Nakagawa et al., 2004) has been cloned in the lentivirus-based vector pLL3.7 (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Cancer Research, Cambridge, MA) (Rubinson et al., 2003), and an empty pLL3.7 vector has been used to generate the control lentivirus vectors. The ubiquitin promoter was replaced with the synapsin promoter. The lentiviral infecting particles were prepared as described previously (Lois et al., 2002). Neurons were infected with SAP97 siRNA (SAP97i) lentivirus at 6 DIV, and TIF preparation was performed at 10 DIV.
Animal treatment.
Adult C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Charles River (Calco, Italy) and received a single intraperitoneal injection of either Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide or Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (3 nmol/g) diluted in sterile saline or vehicle alone. Animals were killed 24 h after injection, and the brain was rapidly dissected.
Brains of control and treated mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (on ice), and, after 24 h, in 30% sucrose in 0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The brain was embedded and frozen in OCT (VWR International, West Chester, PA), and sections (50 μm) were cut on a cryostat and analyzed by fluorescence confocal microscopy.
TIF fractions were purified from one hemisphere of each either control or treated mouse, whereas the other hemisphere was homogenized by Potter homogenizer (Teflon/glass, 700 rpm) in HEPES/∼25 mm Na, containing 2 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, and 0.1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.4. Homogenates were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min to remove crude nuclear material, and supernatants were further centrifuged (60 min at 100,000 × g). Final supernatants were used to measure soluble APP (Caputi et al., 1997). Quantification of immunostaining is shown as fold of control animals in the same experiment. Values are means ± SEM for three independent experiments for a total of 18 animals.
All experimental procedures were performed with care to minimize discomfort and pain to treated animals, in accordance with the guidelines of the European Communities Council (Directive of November 24, 1986, 86/609/EEC).
Quantification and statistical analysis.
Colocalization analysis was performed using Laserpix software (Bio-Rad). Quantification of WB analysis was performed by means of computer-assisted imaging (Quantity-One System; Bio-Rad), and statistical evaluations were performed according to paired Student's t test or one-way ANOVA, when appropriate, followed by Bonferroni's as a post hoc test. Values are shown as means ± SEM.
Results
SAP97 colocalizes with ADAM10 in hippocampal neurons
The distribution pattern of SAP97 and key elements of the amyloid cascade (APP, BACE, and ADAM10) was investigated using a biochemical fractionation approach (Fig. 1 A). PSDs were purified from mouse brain tissue, and SAP97 as well as APP, BACE, and ADAM10 enrichment into different subcellular compartments was analyzed. ADAM10 displayed a high colocalization degree, with SAP97 being enriched in isolated PSD and showing a similar pattern of distribution in the different subcellular fractions (Fig. 1 A). Even if both APP and BACE were detected in the postsynaptic compartment, distribution pattern into the different subcellular fractions was not comparable with that of SAP97 (Fig. 1 A).
Immunocytochemical labeling of ADAM10 in 14 DIV cultured hippocampal neurons revealed a diffuse somatodendritic staining pattern in hippocampal neurons (Fig. 1 B, bottom row). Careful examination of dendritic ADAM10 staining showed a high colocalization degree with SAP97 in a punctuate “spine-like” structures (Fig. 1 B, top rows). Conversely, no visible colocalization of both APP (data not shown) and BACE (data not shown) with SAP97 was observed.
High colocalization degree between SAP97 and ADAM10 was further confirmed in hippocampal neurons transfected with wild-type SAP97, fixed, and stained for endogenous ADAM10 and transfected SAP97 (Fig. 1 C).
To investigate the localization of ADAM10 at either side of the synapse, we double labeled neurons for ADAM10 and PSD-95 (Fig. 2 A, a marker of postsynaptic structures) or synaptophysin (Fig. 2 B, a marker of presynaptic compartment). ADAM10 colocalized with PSD-95 but not with synaptophysin, indicating the presence of ADAM10 at the postsynaptic side of excitatory synapses. Furthermore, triple staining of neurons with ADAM10, SAP97, and Shank (a marker of postsynaptic structures) confirm the colocalization between ADAM10 and SAP97 in the postsynaptic compartment (Fig. 2 C).
SAP97 interacts with ADAM10 through the SH3 domain
The possible interaction between ADAM10 and SAP97 was investigated by means of coimmunoprecipitation experiments. SAP97 coprecipitated with ADAM10 in both homogenate and purified PSD fractions from brain tissue (Fig. 3 A, left column). In addition, a similar ADAM10–SAP97 interaction has been found in coimmunoprecipitation assay performed from human cortex homogenate (Fig. 3 A, right column).
To check for specificity, we evaluated a possible interaction between ADAM10 and SAP102, another member of the MAGUK family, showing the highest degree of sequence homology with SAP97. No signal corresponding to SAP102 was detectable in the immunocomplex in either homogenate or PSD fraction, indicating that SAP102 is not able to interact with ADAM10 (Fig. 3 A). Moreover, the absence of any NR2A/B signal in ADAM10 coimmunoprecipitates excludes that in our experimental conditions the coprecipitation of SAP97 reflects an unspecific immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3 A) (Gardoni et al., 2003).
We then evaluated the possibility of a direct interaction between SAP97 and ADAM10. Analysis of the amino acidic sequence of ADAM10 and SAP97 revealed the presence of two proline-rich domains in ADAM10 cytoplasmic tail, essential for ADAM10 sorting (Wild-Bode et al., 2006), which could interact with the SH3 domain of SAP97. To test this hypothesis, we used a pull-down approach. Fusion proteins of GST with SAP97–SH3–(580–650), SAP97–PDZ1–(217–318), SAP97–PDZ3–(465–545), and SAP97–N-terminal domain–(7–223) were purified and incubated with PSD proteins. GST–SAP97–SH3–(580–650) was solely able to pull down ADAM10, and neither GST alone nor the other SAP97 domains tested interacted with ADAM10 (Fig. 3 B, top).
To further confirm these results, solubilized PSD proteins were incubated with GST–ADAM10–(697–748) containing the two proline-rich sequences and submitted to pull-down experiments. Western blot analysis revealed a band corresponding to SAP97, indicating that ADAM10 cytoplasmic tail directly binds SAP97 (Fig. 3 B, bottom). This set of experiments demonstrated a direct interaction between SAP97 and ADAM10 occurring through SH3 and proline-rich domains.
To support these findings in intact living cells, we performed a clustering assay in heterologous cells. COS-7 cells were double transfected with ADAM10 and SAP97; both proteins showed a diffuse distribution throughout the cell with the presence of clusters in which ADAM10 immunoreactivity colocalized with SAP97 (Fig. 3 C). In contrast, cotransfection of ADAM10 with GFP–PSD-95 or with SAP97 deletion construct SAP97547, lacking the SH3 domain, showed a perinuclear accumulation of ADAM10 (Fig. 3 C) comparable with the staining observed in ADAM10 single transfection (data not shown). Therefore, ADAM10 proline stretches are responsible for interaction with SAP97 SH3 domain.
SAP97 drives ADAM10 to spines on NMDA receptor activation
Is ADAM10/SAP97 interaction relevant in influencing the localization of the enzyme inside the cell?
SAP97 has been implicated in the synaptic targeting of ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits (Gardoni et al., 2003; Mauceri et al., 2004). NMDA receptor activation is known to be sufficient to drive SAP97 to the PSD in cultured neurons (Gardoni et al., 2003); hence, we asked whether the same experimental conditions are capable of delivering also ADAM10 to this compartment.
Hippocampal neurons were incubated in the absence or presence of NMDA (50 μm, 1 h), and then ADAM10 trafficking to the postsynaptic membrane was analyzed. TIF, which is enriched in PSD proteins (Gardoni et al., 2001), was obtained from control and NMDA-treated neurons, and protein levels measured by Western blotting. NMDA treatment significantly increased both SAP97 (Fig. 4 A) (n = 9; p = 0.037; +73.4 ± 29.3%, NMDA vs C) and ADAM10 immunostaining (Fig. 4 A) (n = 9; p = 0.021; +73.8 ± 26.6%, NMDA vs C) in the TIF, without affecting the levels of the two proteins in the homogenate (Fig. 4 A) (n = 9; p > 0.05, ADAM10 and SAP97 NMDA vs C). As a negative control, CaMKII levels were not modified by the NMDA treatment (Fig. 4 A) (n = 9; p > 0.05, NMDA vs C). Thus, NMDA receptor activation affects the redistribution of ADAM10/SAP97 within the cell.
Biochemical data were further confirmed by immunocytochemical labeling of ADAM10 in cultured hippocampal neurons; as shown in Figure 4 B, NMDA treatment led to an increased punctuate staining of ADAM10 in spine-like structures and to a concomitant decrease of ADAM10 signal along the dendritic shafts (Fig. 4 B) (F spines/F dendrites, n = 40; C, 0.962 ± 0.061; NMDA, 1.325 ± 0.074; p = 0.8 10−3, NMDA vs C).
In parallel samples, cell viability by means of MTT test was checked (n = 9; p > 0.05, NMDA vs C), which excluded NMDA-dependent cell death in our experimental conditions.
We next examined the effects of NMDA treatment on ADAM10 surface expression. To this, control and NMDA hippocampal cultures were treated with the cross-linker BS3, a membrane-impermeable amine-reactive cross-linker reagent (Fig. 4 C). ADAM10 surface pool was not detectable because of the formation of high-molecular-weight aggregates that barely entered the gel (Fig. 4 C, top). Whereas no alteration of a cytosolic protein such as actin was detected, a significant decrease in the ADAM10 intracellular pool was observed (Fig. 4 C) (n = 3; p = 0.031; −31 ± 5.6%, NMDA vs C), indicating that NMDA receptor activation promotes ADAM10 insertion in the cell membranes.
ADAM10/SAP97 association positively modulates ADAM10 activity
The enzymatically active form of ADAM10 mainly exerts its effect of α-secretase cleavage of APP in the membrane compartment (Lammich et al., 1999). Thus, the functional consequences of SAP97-mediated trafficking of ADAM10 on ADAM10 activity and APP processing products were further investigated in hippocampal neuronal cultures after NMDA treatment. In these experimental conditions, both sAPPα release in the medium and APP CTFs, CTF99 for β-cleavage and CTF83 for α-cleavage, respectively (Kamenetz et al., 2003; Zimmermann et al., 2004; Adlard et al., 2005), were measured. Immunoblot experiments, performed with pAb APP Ab-2, raised against 1–10 amino acids of the Aβ sequence, showed that NMDA treatment increased sAPPα release from hippocampal neurons (Fig. 4 D, left) (n = 9; p = 0.04; +81.1 ± 35.8%, NMDA vs C). sAPPα release from hippocampal neurons is suggested to be attributable to ADAM10 activity because TIMP-1, an inhibitor of metalloproteinases (Amour et al., 2000; Brew et al., 2000), completely blocked sAPPα release (Fig. 4 D, right). Aβ42 release was measured by ELISA, and the results obtained show that NMDA treatment significantly reduces Aβ42 secretion in neuronal medium (n = 4; p = 0.006; −32.1 ± 4.6%, NMDA vs C).
TIF proteins from control and treated neurons were then separated by 15% Tris-tricine gel and subjected to Western blot analysis with mAb 4G8 to detect both CTF99 and CTF83. Quantitative analysis revealed that NMDA treatment determined a significant increase of CTF83/CTF99 ratio (Fig. 4 E) (n = 9; p = 0.015; +17.8 ± 5.8%, NMDA vs C), again indicating an enhancement of α-secretase activity. Therefore, NMDA receptor activation under physiological conditions induces ADAM10 trafficking, through association with SAP97, toward postsynaptic membranes and in turn enables APP cleavage at the α-secretase site.
Interaction with SAP97 is needed for ADAM10 trafficking to postsynaptic compartment
To further clarify the role of SAP97 in the modulation of ADAM10 targeting to the postsynaptic membranes, a fluorescein labeled cell-penetrating Tat peptide (Green and Loewenstein, 1988) fused to ADAM10 proline-rich domains (Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729) was used to disrupt ADAM10/SAP97 interaction. Peptide penetration into hippocampal neurons was first assessed by means of confocal microscopy (data not shown). Second, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 (10 μm) capability of interfering with ADAM10/SAP97 association in primary cultures was evaluated by coimmunoprecipitation experiments after 2 or 6 h of peptide treatment (Fig. 5 A). Treatments with Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (in which all proline residues were substituted with alanine) were always performed as control.
Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide was able to disrupt ADAM10/SAP97 interaction already after 2 h of incubation (Fig. 5 A) and proved this approach useful to verify SAP97 role in driving ADAM10 to the postsynaptic membrane. As expected, no effect on ADAM10/SAP97 interaction was induced by the Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (Fig. 5 B).
Cultures exposed or not exposed to Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide were then treated with NMDA (50 μm, 1 h) and double labeled for ADAM10 and PSD-95. Confocal microscopy showed that Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide incubation per se was not able to induce modifications of ADAM10 immunostaining, whereas NMDA treatment alone led to an increased punctuate staining of ADAM10 in spine-like structures (Fig. 5 C), confirming the above described data (Fig. 4 A,B). Quantification of ADAM10 staining revealed a significant increase in ADAM10 colocalization with PSD-95 as a marker for spine structure (Fig. 5 D) (n = 47; p = 0.048, NMDA vs C). Conversely, when neuronal cultures were preincubated with Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide, NMDA receptor activation failed to induce the increase of ADAM10 staining in spine-like structures (Fig. 5 D) (n = 47; p = 0.03; NMDA plus Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 vs NMDA). Therefore, the cell-permeable peptide, which interferes with ADAM10/SAP97 association, is able to prevent NMDA-induced ADAM10 trafficking to the postsynaptic compartment. No effect on ADAM10 localization in PSD-95-positive spine-like structure was induced by treatment with Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 control peptide (Fig. 5 D) (n = 47; p = 0.0001, NMDA plus Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 vs NMDA plus Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729).
To evaluate the effect on APP metabolism, cultures exposed or not exposed to Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 or Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide were then treated with NMDA (50 μm, 1 h), and Aβ42 release in the media was measured by ELISA. Treatment with NMDA/Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide markedly increases the amount of Aβ42 released into the medium (Fig. 5 E) (n = 3; p = 0.00015; +65.9 ± 4.7%, NMDA/Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 vs C), suggesting that disruption of the ADAM10/SAP97 complex entails a decreased ADAM10 activity and a shift toward amyloidogenic APP metabolism. As expected, the NMDA/Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 treatment does not differ from NMDA alone (Fig. 5 E) (n = 3; p = 0.038; −25.2 ± 7.5%, NMDA plus Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 vs C).
Effect of SAP97 siRNA on ADAM10 localization and APP metabolism
To further evaluate the role of SAP97 in the modulation of ADAM10 function in hippocampal neurons, primary cultures were infected with SAP97i expressing lentivirus. Nearly 100% of neurons in culture can be infected with lentivirus with minimal cytotoxicity; the effect of SAP97i could therefore be quantified at a biochemical level across the entire population of neurons in culture. Compared with empty virus infection at the same viral titer, lentivirus expressing SAP97i caused profound and specific knockdown of SAP97 as shown by immunoblotting of total homogenate of hippocampal cultures. No alterations of ADAM10 or SAP102 and CaMKII as control protein levels were observed in total lysates, confirming the specificity of SAP97i knockdown (Fig. 6 A). TIFs were obtained from hippocampal neurons infected with either empty lentivirus or SAP97i lentivirus, and protein levels were measured by Western blotting. siRNA knockdown of SAP97 decreases ADAM10 localization in the postsynaptic compartment (Fig. 6 A) (n = 3; p = 0.032; −50.7 ± 9.3%, SAP97i vs empty). A similar reduction is observed in SAP97 protein level in the TIFs. Again, no significant alteration of SAP102 and CaMKII levels were found (Fig. 6 A).
TIF proteins from control and SAP97i neurons were then analyzed to detect both CTF99 and CTF83. Quantitative analysis revealed that siRNA knockdown of SAP97 determined a significant decrease of the CTF83/CTF99 ratio (Fig. 6 B) (n = 3; p = 0.032; −26 ± 4.7%, SAP97i vs empty).
ADAM10/SAP97 interaction affects α-secretase activity in vivo
To determine whether the alteration of ADAM10/SAP97 interaction might affect ADAM10-mediated APP metabolism also in vivo, C57BL/6 mice were injected with the Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide or with the Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 control peptide. Indeed, both Tat-ADAM10709–729 peptides are able to cross the blood–brain barrier and penetrate neurons within 24 h after intraperitoneal injection (Aarts et al., 2002) (data not shown).
No effect of Tat peptides was detected in Western blotting performed from the whole-brain homogenate, indicating that the peptides did not affect ADAM10 as well as SAP97 expression (Fig. 7 A, left) (n = 18; p > 0.05, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide vs C). The interference of Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 with ADAM10/SAP97 association in vivo was assessed by means of coimmunoprecipitation experiments performed on brain homogenates. These experiments revealed that the administration of the peptide reduced ADAM10/SAP97 coprecipitation in treated animals compared with control mice (Fig. 7 A, right) (n = 18; p = 0.002; −67.4 ± 7.0%, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide vs C). As shown in the cultures above, no effect on ADAM10 interaction with SAP97 was induced by the Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide (Fig. 7 A, right) (n = 18; p > 0.05, Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide vs C).
In addition, we purified TIF from control, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 and Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide-treated mice. Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 but not Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide treatment significantly reduced ADAM10 immunostaining in TIF (Fig. 7 B) (n = 18; p = 0.0003; −28.8 ± 4.2%, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide vs C). Finally, because Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide proved to be effective in vivo, we investigated ADAM10 activity, measuring total sAPP and sAPPα in control and treated mice brains. Western blot experiments showed that the Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 but not Tat-Ala ADAM10709–729 peptide decreased sAPPα production (Fig. 7 C) (n = 18; p = 0.008; −38.3 ± 5.4%, Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide vs C) without affecting the release of total soluble APP, indicating a reduction of ADAM10 activity (Fig. 7 C) (n = 18; p > 0.05).
Discussion
In the last few years, a number of observations have reported a close relationship between cognitive impairment and synaptic failure within cortex and hippocampus of AD patients (DeKosky and Scheff, 1990; Bertoni-Freddari et al., 1996). Furthermore, data obtained in AD brains and APP transgenic mice revealed that synaptic dysfunction is an early event preceding physical deterioration of neuronal structures (Oddo et al., 2003; Palop et al., 2003). Although deficits in numerous neurotransmitters accrue as the disease progresses, the early symptoms appear to correlate with dysfunction of cholinergic and glutamatergic synapses (Selkoe, 2002).
In addition, although a clear dysfunction of nerve terminal has been reported (Hsia et al., 1999), preferential loss of postsynaptic compared with presynaptic elements in AD has been suggested based on decreases in drebrin, a postsynaptic actin-binding protein (Harigaya et al., 1996; Shim and Lubec, 2002). Nevertheless, a clear-cut relationship between postsynaptic elements and players of APP metabolism is not yet understood.
Here we report that a key element responsible for the correct assembly of the glutamatergic synapses, SAP97, which works as a cargo protein involved in trafficking iGluRs to the postsynaptic density (Gardoni et al., 2003; Mauceri et al., 2004), is also responsible for driving ADAM10 to the membrane. This event is primed by NMDA receptor activation, and it is mandatory for ADAM10 activity.
Recently, our laboratory demonstrated that drugs active on the cholinergic system, and used as therapy for dementia, are capable of inducing ADAM10 trafficking from the reticulum to the plasma membrane in a cholinergic receptor-independent manner (Zimmermann et al., 2004).
These results highlighted the importance of intracellular ADAM10 transport as a possible key process in shifting APP processing toward the non-amyloidogenic pathway. In fact, it is well known that ADAM10 can cleave APP in the α-secretase site only when the two proteins colocalize in either the plasma membrane or the late secretory vesicles (Lammich et al., 1999).
Even if potential α-secretase activity has been ascribed recently to other members of the ADAM family (Buxbaum et al., 1998) and BACE2 (Yan et al., 2001; Fluhrer et al., 2002), here we show that exposure of hippocampal neurons to TIMP-1 (Amour et al., 2000; Brew et al., 2000) totally abolished sAPPα release. These data suggest that α-secretase cleavage of APP in our experimental conditions can be ascribed to ADAM10.
Here we fully characterize the intracellular molecular events driving ADAM10 to the membrane in glutamatergic neurons. Indeed, SAP97 colocalizes in primary hippocampal neurons with ADAM10. The colocalization of the two proteins is further strengthened by immunoprecipitation experiments, because the immunoprecipitation performed with an antibody recognizing ADAM10 entails the precipitation of SAP97 in rodent brain homogenate, in purified PSD fraction, and in human cortex.
These results not only suggest a possible direct interaction in specific subcellular domains between ADAM10 and SAP97 but they also limit the colocalization of the two proteins in a specific fraction of the postsynaptic compartment, namely the PSD. Previous studies described APP processing as a presynaptic phenomenon (Marquez-Sterling et al., 1997; Lazarov et al., 2005). Nevertheless, APP has been also located by light and electron microscopy in the PSD (Shigematsu and McGeer, 1992). Furthermore, ADAM10 has been described to shed several substrates with a postsynaptic localization (Reiss et al., 2005), and a trans-synaptic cleavage exerted by ADAM10 has been claimed recently (Janes et al., 2005).
The PSD, a membrane specialization in which receptors and signaling molecules are segregated, plays a key role in tuning the response of the postsynaptic neurons to different stimuli (Kim and Sheng, 2004). Because it is responsible for modulating the calcium response through NMDA receptor in time and space, it may be considered a locus to express both plasticity and excitotoxicity (Sattler and Tymianski, 2001). The localization of ADAM10 to the PSD, in which it expresses its function, correlates APP metabolism and iGluRs function. This relationship between iGluRs and APP metabolism may be interpreted as bidirectional given the recent findings of a direct action of soluble/oligomeric Aβ on the postsynaptic membrane (Cleary et al., 2005).
A pulse of NMDA, which leads to postsynaptic activation with no neuronal death, is capable of driving both SAP97 and ADAM10 to the membrane and the translocation of the enzyme in the membrane compartment is necessary and instrumental for α-secretase activity. Interestingly, the same protocol of activation of ADAM10 has been used recently to promote the cleavage of N-cadherin (Reiss et al., 2005).
These data reinforce the evidence of a correlation between sAPPα production and synaptic plasticity; in fact, sAPPα is neuroprotective and neurotrophic and regulates cell excitability and synaptic plasticity, whereas Aβ appears to exert opposite effects (Turner et al., 2003).
The trafficking of ADAM10/SAP97 induced by NMDA occurs through a direct interaction between the proline-rich domains of ADAM10 and the SH3 domain of SAP97. Furthermore, this interaction is necessary for the NMDA-induced ADAM10 trafficking, because the treatment of hippocampal neurons with the cell-permeable Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide mimicking the proline-rich region of ADAM10 and disrupting SAP97/ADAM10 interaction counteracts the capability of NMDA of fostering SAP97/ADAM10 complex to the membrane and of promoting ADAM10 activity. Thus, ADAM10/SAP97 interaction positively modulates APP metabolism toward non-amyloidogenic processing. Interestingly, a disturbance of SAP97/GluR1 interaction has been reported in AD brain (Wakabayashi et al., 1999), suggesting a defect in trafficking and functioning of SAP97 in the course of the disease. In agreement with this finding, perturbing ADAM10/SAP97 interaction in vivo leads to a shifting of APP metabolism toward amyloidogenic products. In fact, a single intraperitoneal injection of Tat-Pro ADAM10709–729 peptide in mice led to a disruption of ADAM10/SAP97 interaction in vivo, a loss of membrane localization of ADAM10, and a strong decrease in α-secretase activity as revealed by a reduction of sAPPα formation in brain-soluble fraction of treated mice. These data imply that a loss of interaction between SAP97 and ADAM10 causes a strong impairment in physiological APP metabolism. Whether this mechanism entails a disturbance in the structural organization and the function of the glutamatergic synapse has still to be demonstrated, even if it is generally accepted that this synaptic circuitry is a target for toxic action of Aβ oligomers, in which they inhibit (Walsh et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2002) and disrupt normal expression of a synaptic immediate early gene essential for long-term memory formation (Lacor et al., 2004).
Recently, a close relationship between Aβ production and NMDA receptor activity in cultured neurons has been put forward (Snyder et al., 2005). Here we demonstrate that the glutamatergic synapse can intrinsically express a mechanism, driven by NMDA activation, at a postsynaptic level, that is responsible for shifting APP metabolism toward a non-amyloidogenic pathway. Thus, this represents a potential intrinsic additional mechanism of regulation of pathogenesis eventually driven by Aβ. According to this view, the presynaptic failure and the postsynaptic induced APP metabolism may equally contribute to express AD pathogenesis.
Finally, our data indicate SAP97 as a bridge between key elements of the primary pathogenic events of AD, such as ADAM10, and key elements of the secondary pathogenic events such, as the glutamatergic synaptic dysfunction, adding new pieces to the puzzle in the understanding of the complex and coordinated events leading to AD pathogenesis.
Footnotes
-
This work was supported by European Community Contract LSHM-CT-2004-511995 (Synaptic Scaffolding Proteins Orchestrating Cortical Synapse Organisation during Development), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ministry of Health and Progetto Alzheimer Regione Lombardia Ministry of Health, PRIN 2005 (all to M.D.), and by Alzheimer's Organization (F.G.). We thank A. Longhi for technical assistance, L. Riccioni, and I. Squellerio and M. Malinverno for excellent practical work. We are grateful to M. Passafaro for kindly providing SAP97 cDNA, F. Fahrenholz for cDNA of ADAM10, M. Sheng for GFP–PSD-95 cDNA, and Y. Hayashi for SAP97 siRNA construct.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Monica Di Luca, Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milan, Italy. monica.diluca{at}unimi.it