Intended for healthcare professionals

Practice Practice Pointer

Lithium and chronic kidney disease

BMJ 2009; 339 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2452 (Published 03 July 2009) Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2452
  1. Mukesh Kripalani, specialist registrar1,
  2. James Shawcross, speciality registrar2,
  3. Joe Reilly, professor of mental health3,
  4. John Main, consultant renal physician2
  1. 1Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, St Luke’s Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3AF
  2. 2South Tees Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW
  3. 3Durham University, School for Medicine and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Stockton on Tees TS17 6BH
  1. Correspondence to: J Reilly j.g.reilly{at}durham.ac.uk
  • Accepted 16 March 2009

Lithium use is associated with renal disorder and renal failure; this article offers guidance on monitoring, drug interactions, and when to consider stopping the drug

Lithium remains a key drug in the treatment of bipolar disorder1 and recurrent depressive disorder, and renal monitoring is essential for safe prescribing. The recent guidance from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on early identification and management of chronic kidney disease mentions lithium as a nephrotoxin and emphasises active management of hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors.2 Lithium prescribers in the United Kingdom already receive estimated glomerular filtration rate results when monitoring renal function in lithium users,3 and the inclusion of lithium monitoring in the primary care quality and outcomes framework has raised awareness about its importance. This article discusses the effects of lithium on the kidney and looks at existing evidence to guide treatment when incidental chronic kidney disease is detected in those in whom lithium is being considered or when long term lithium users develop chronic kidney disease.

What do we know about the effect of lithium on the kidney?

Lithium use is associated with a range of glomerular and tubular disorders resulting in chronic kidney disease and more rarely established renal failure.4 5 (see the web table on bmj.com) Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is commonly observed and may predispose to acute lithium toxicity, but it does not directly lead to progressive renal impairment. In clinical practice some lithium users have a stable reduction in glomerular filtration rate or a slowly progressive decline, for which a biopsy is rarely carried out; hence the histopathology is poorly characterised. The existing evidence from a small cohort study shows a “creeping creatinine” phenomenon (a progressive increase in the serum creatinine concentration over time), with some evidence of improvement on discontinuation.6 It remains uncertain who is at risk of either milder degrees of renal impairment or specific renal lesions, and the influence of other factors such as age, mental illness (which may in itself be a risk factor for chronic kidney disease), hypertension, and diabetes remains unclear. Hence little evidence exists to guide prescribing at the early stages of chronic kidney disease.

Renal health in people with severe mental illness as a whole is unresearched, but given that cardiovascular risk factors, which also increase the risk of chronic kidney disease, are more prevalent in this population, chronic kidney disease is probably also more common. Once chronic kidney disease is established in the general population, individuals are more likely to develop life limiting cardiovascular disease than to develop end stage renal failure,7 so the management of cardiovascular risk factors in lithium associated chronic kidney disease may be of at least equal importance as renal monitoring for the prevention of adverse physical health outcomes. Even if it is not possible to say with certainty whether a specific case of chronic renal impairment is due primarily to lithium exposure or other factors, it remains necessary to manage those with reduced renal function appropriately. For prescribers, the clinical importance of lithium associated chronic kidney disease depends on the renal and psychiatric consequences of starting or continuing lithium compared with the consequences of choosing an alternative drug or switching from lithium.

What pretreatment screening is necessary?

Cross sectional studies showing increased rates of chronic kidney disease compared with the general population, and biopsy studies showing a range of pathology, suggest it is prudent to screen for renal risk before starting lithium therapy (figure). Although measuring the albumin to creatinine ratio is not a requirement included by NICE in its guidelines on pretreatment screening for chronic kidney disease, it does provide a useful baseline for distinguishing incidental proteinuria from proteinuria that results from lithium treatment. Box 1 outlines how to asses the risk factors for chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease.

Figure1

Flowchart for renal screening before starting lithium, after results of estimated glomerular filtration rate and ratio of albumin to creatinine

Box 1 Clinical assessment of risk factors for chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease

  • History—structural kidney disease, hereditary factors, diabetes, hypertension, drug interactions (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors)

  • Electrocardiography, blood pressure, body mass index

  • Investigations—blood glucose, lipids, calcium, estimated glomerular filtration rate, thyroid stimulating hormone (with ongoing monitoring for risk of drug induced thyroid disorder), urinary albumin to creatinine ratio

How should renal function be monitored in lithium therapy?

Although our recommendations extrapolate evidence from high quality diagnostic studies used to develop the NICE guideline on chronic kidney disease, it remains uncertain how lithium users differ from those at risk of the disease because of hypertension, diabetes, or use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Well patients with stable therapeutic lithium concentrations should have annual measurement of blood pressure and calculation of estimated glomerular filtration rate, with urine analysis for blood and protein. Rising serum concentrations of lithium (monitored every three months) should prompt additional calculation of estimated glomerular filtration rate, as should clinical features of possible lithium toxicity (nausea, diarrhoea, coarse tremor, ataxia, and confusion). The onset of lithium associated nephrogenic diabetes insipidus may increase the risk of raised lithium concentrations and toxicity. Vigilance should therefore be maintained for its main features (excessive thirst and polyuria), with dose reduction or a switch to alternative treatment if symptoms are persistent, as lithium associated nephrogenic diabetes insipidus is usually reversible when detected early in the treatment.

Above a rate of 60 ml/min/1.732 body surface, the estimated glomerular filtration rate is inaccurate, but this is unimportant in this context because the recommended renal monitoring for lithium users with stage 1 or 2 of chronic kidney disease is the same as for those with normal kidney function. In these three groups, dipstick proteinuria should be quantified by measuring the ratio of albumin to creatinine on a spot urine sample, and values of >70 mg/mmol should be discussed with a nephrologist.

Increased monitoring is needed for patients with stage 3 of chronic kidney disease or worse (table).2 Lithium has a narrow therapeutic index (ratio of therapeutic dose to toxic dose), and acute toxicity is more likely in those with an already diminished glomerular filtration rate.8 Full discussion of the management of lithium concentrations outside the therapeutic range and acute lithium toxicity9 is outside the remit of this article. NICE’s guidelines on bipolar disorder recommend monitoring lithium serum concentrations every three months, with additional monitoring one week after any change in dose. Concentrations should be measured 12-14 hours after the last dose to obtain a reliable estimate to guide treatment.

Renal monitoring in established lithium treatment (based on NICE guidelines on chronic kidney disease2)

View this table:

Which drug interactions are important?

Active management of cardiovascular risk factors, and blood pressure in particular, is just as appropriate in lithium users as in any other high risk group, but lithium’s propensity to interact with diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs must be borne in mind (box 2). Lithium users who start taking an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor will become more susceptible to an acute decline in their glomerular filtration rate, which may in turn markedly increase their serum lithium concentration.10

Box 2 Drugs known to interact with lithium

Diuretics
  • Avoid thiazides as they will raise serum lithium concentrations

  • Use extreme caution with loop diuretics

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors
  • Use closer monitoring: measure serum lithium concentration and estimated glomerular filtration rate after starting lithium treatment and after any increases in dose

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Avoid prescribing them for long term use if possible

  • Consider closer monitoring of serum lithium concentration depending on dose and other risk factors

  • No evidence exists that low dose aspirin confers any additional risk

When should lithium be stopped?

No systematic evidence exists on which to base a decision to stop lithium, particularly for moderate degrees of chronic kidney disease. We recommend not trying to decide whether progressive chronic kidney disease results specifically from lithium—and no evidence exists that renal biopsy is useful in the decision making. Box 3 outlines possible considerations in decision making about stopping lithium.

Box 3 Decision making about stopping lithium

Renal factors (table)
  • A fall in the estimated glomerular filtration rate to below 45 ml/min/1.732 body surface (or a rapidly falling rate) or heavy proteinuria requires nephrology advice or opinion

  • Change over time is more important than a single measurement (intercurrent illness can upset kidney function in chronic kidney disease)

  • Graphical monitoring of the estimated glomerular filtration rate or reciprocal serum creatinine over time is a useful decision aid

  • Consider stopping lithium if clear evidence exists of persistent decline over time

  • Lithium will normally be stopped in stages 4 and 5 of chronic kidney disease

Psychiatric factors
  • At the earlier stages of chronic kidney disease, the decision to continue or stop requires an individual clinical assessment of the impact on mental health, particularly if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is stable over time

  • Stopping may be appropriate at an early stage if mood disorder has been stable for some years

  • Monitored continuation may be appropriate if consequences of past relapse have been severe or lithium has proved to be the most effective drug

Many users believe lithium is critical to their freedom from affective episodes, and evidence is accumulating for its antisuicidal effect. Any decision to stop lithium must take into account the likely effects on both renal and mental health, neither of which can be accurately predicted. Stopping or replacing lithium should be done gradually over three to six months to reduce the risk of rebound mania in bipolar disorder, although lithium can be withdrawn over a month (if switching to another agent) or immediately (if lithium concentrations are toxic or acute renal failure is present). The other commonly used agents for bipolar disorder (such as valproate, carbamazepine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and aripiprazole) are not nephrotoxic and so present a safer treatment, but without a guarantee that they will be similarly effective.

What does this mean for lithium users?

Lithium users rely on the information given to them by their prescriber, balanced against fears and misapprehensions about treatment that they may share with family members and other users. The factors influencing a personal decision to start and adhere to lithium treatment are poorly understood but may be heavily influenced by the education and advice from prescribers.11 The fact that progressive chronic kidney disease is asymptomatic until most kidney function has been lost underlines the need to engage users in an ongoing education and monitoring process.

Conclusion

Lithium use is associated with glomerular and tubular disease resulting in chronic kidney disease and more rarely established renal failure. It remains unclear which patients will develop milder and potentially reversible degrees of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate and which will develop more severe chronic kidney disease. NICE’s guidelines identify lithium exposure as a risk factor triggering screening for chronic kidney disease and ongoing monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate.

In the UK, the provision of renal monitoring of lithium varies. Traditionally, monitoring was split between secondary psychiatric care based lithium clinics and primary care, depending on local custom and preference. The introduction of the targets in the quality and outcomes framework, however, may be shifting monitoring more to primary care (figures for 2007-8 show 97% achievement on a target to measure creatinine in lithium users in the previous 15 months).12 This shift is appropriate given the increased need to manage cardiovascular risk factors and hypertension in a coordinated way. Lithium safety must be supported by good communication, recording, and action on biochemistry results, with rapid access to specialist nephrology and psychiatric advice when withdrawal is considered.

The decision to stop lithium or switch to an alternative drug remains a careful judgment of risk versus benefit, in partnership with an informed patient who is fully committed to regular monitoring and understands the need to seek help early when problems arise. No evidence exists to support hasty cessation of the drug in those with mildly reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the consequence of stopping lithium is a high risk of relapse in bipolar disorder. Larger epidemiological studies are needed to offer prescribers more precise evidence on which to base these important decisions. Longer term prospective cohort studies are needed to determine which individuals are prone to develop renal impairment while on lithium.

Summary points

  • Lithium use is associated with renal disorder and renal failure, but the magnitude of risk is uncertain

  • Screening for risk of renal disease is essential before prescribing lithium

  • Close monitoring is needed when the estimated glomerular filtration rate falls below 60 ml/min/1.732 body surface

  • In some patients lithium may still be the only suitable mood stabiliser despite an abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate

Methods

We searched the literature for cohort and case-control studies including histopathology studies of lithium and renal function as part of a wider systematic review. Databases searched were Medline, Pubmed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane.

Advice for non-specialists

  • Where the estimated glomerular filtration rate is <60 ml/min/1.732 body surface in those using lithium, prescribers should check for proteinuria and monitor for more rapid reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, as a guide to whether nephrology referral is needed

  • At stages 4 and 5 of chronic kidney disease, nephrology referral is essential

  • Closer monitoring is needed when an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug is coprescribed

  • Education and partnership with users are essential to ensure safety

  • Lithium should be discontinued gradually with specialist psychiatric advice

Resources

For health professionals
Information resources for patients

Notes

Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2452

Footnotes

  • Contributors: MK and JS searched literature for relevant articles. All authors participated in writing the text and revisions. Baxi Sinha supplied the flowchart for renal screening and commented on revisions. John Drury and Helen Close supplied comments and changes to revisions of this paper. JR is the guarantor for this article.

  • Funding: No special funding.

  • Competing interests: JR has received a speaker’s fee from Janssen-Cilag, which makes an antimanic agent.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References