Abstract
Between-study comparisons of benzodiazepine and anticholinergic drugs on working memory suggest that anticholinergics may produce greater impairment in maintenance processes, whereas benzodiazepines may produce greater impairment in manipulation processes. This study directly compared acute effects of the benzodiazepine lorazepam (1.0 and 2.0 mg/70 kg, orally administered) and the anticholinergic scopolamine (0.25 and 0.50 mg/ 70 kg, subcutaneously administered) on working memory maintenance (storage and rehearsal) and manipulation processes in a placebo-controlled, double-dummy, double-blind, crossover design in 20 healthy volunteers. Using a modified Sternberg paradigm, storage, rehearsal, and manipulation processes were parametrically manipulated by varying memory load, delay between stimulus presentation and test, and number of operations performed on the letter strings, respectively, while controlling for drug effects on nonmemory processes. As predicted, the results suggested greater impairment in maintenance processes (rehearsal) with scopolamine than with lorazepam and greater impairment in manipulation processes with lorazepam than with scopolamine. In addition, the results suggested greater overall slowing of working memory processes with lorazepam.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 281–288.
Barch, D. M. (2004). Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory. Psychopharmacology, 174, 126–135.
Barde, L. H., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2002). Models of functional organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex in verbal working memory: Evidence in favor of the process model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1054–1063.
Berman, K. F., Austin-Lane, J. L., Esposito, G., Van Horn, J. D., & Weinberger, D. R. (1996). Dissecting the “working” and the “memory” in a PET study of working memory using graded tasks and isomorphic stimuli. NeuroImage, 3, S529.
Bishop, K. I., Curran, H. V., & Lader, M. (1996). Do scopolamine and lorazepam have dissociable effects on human memory systems? A dose-response study with normal volunteers. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 4, 292–299.
Chrobak, J. J., & Napier, T. C. (1992). Delayed-non-match-to-sample performance in the radial arm maze: Effects of dopaminergic and gabaergic agents. Psychopharmacology, 108, 72–78.
Coull, J. T., Middleton, H. C., Robbins, T. W., & Sahakian, B. J. (1995). Contrasting effects of clonidine and diazepam on tests of working memory and planning. Psychopharmacology, 120, 311–321.
Curran, H. V. (1991). Benzodiazepines, memory, and mood: A review. Psychopharmacology, 105, 1–8.
Curran, H. V. (2000). Psychopharmacological approaches to human memory. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 797–804). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Curran, H. V., Schifano, F., & Lader, M. (1991). Models of memory dysfunction? A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on memory, psychomotor performance and mood. Psychopharmacology, 103, 83–90.
D’Esposito, M. (2001). Functional neuroimaging of working memory. In R. Cabeza & A. Kingstone (Eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition (pp. 293–327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
D’Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (1999). The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1303–1315.
D’Esposito, M., Postle, B. R., Ballard, D., & Lease, J. (1999). Maintenance versus manipulation of information held in working memory: An event-related fMRI study. Brain & Cognition, 41, 66–86.
D’Esposito, M., Postle, B. R., & Rypma, B. (2000). Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: Evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 3–11.
Duka, T., Curran, H. V., Rusted, J. M., & Weingartner, H. J. (1996). Perspectives on cognitive psychopharmacology research. Behavioural Pharmacology, 7, 401–410.
Furey, M. L., Pietrini, P., Alexander, G. E., Schapiro, M. B., & Horwitz, B. (2000). Cholinergic enhancement improves performance on working memory by modulating the functional activity in distinct brain regions: A positron emission tomography regional cerebral blood flow study in healthy humans. Brain Research Bulletin, 51, 213–218.
Furey, M. L., Pietrini, P., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Cholinergic enhancement and increased selectivity of perceptual processing during working memory. Science, 290, 2315–2319.
Furey, M. L., Pietrini, P., Haxby, J. V., Alexander, G. E., Lee, H. C., VanMeter, J., et al. (1997). Cholinergic stimulation alters performance and task-specific regional cerebral blood flow during working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 6512–6516.
Glahn, D. C., Kim, J., Cohen, M. S., Poutanen, V. P., Therman, S., Bava, S., et al. (2002). Maintenance and manipulation in spatial working memory: Dissociations in the prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 17, 201–213.
Glasky, A. J., Melchior, C. L., Pirzadeh, B., Heydari, N., & Ritzmann, R. F. (1994). Effect of AIT-082, a purine analog, on working memory in normal and aged mice. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 47, 325–329.
Hironaka, N., Miyata, H., & Ando, K. (1992). Effects of psychoactive drugs on short-term memory in rats and rhesus monkeys. Japanese Journal of Pharmacology, 59, 113–120.
Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J., & Passannante, A. (2002). Midazolam amnesia and dual process models of the word frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 499–516.
Hirshman, E., Passannante, A., & Arndt, J. (2001). Midazolam amnesia and conceptual processing in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 453–465.
Honey, R. A., Turner, D. C., Honey, G. D., Sharar, S. R., Kumaran, D., Pomarol-Clotet, E., et al. (2003). Subdissociative dose ketamine produces a deficit in manipulation but not maintenance of the contents of working memory. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28,2037–20444.
Ingles, J. L., Beninger, R. J., Jhamandas, K., & Boegman, R. J. (1993). Scopolamine injected into the rat amygdala impairs working memory in the double Y-maze. Brain Research Bulletin, 32, 339–344.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ketchum, J. S., Sidell, F. R., Crowell, E. G., Aghajanian, G. K., & Haines, A. H. (1973). Atropine, scopolamine, and ditran: Comparative pharmacology and antagonists in man. Psychopharmacologia, 28, 121–145.
Kim, J., Glahn, D. C., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Cannon, T. D. (2004). Maintenance and manipulation of information in schizophrenia: Further evidence for impairment in the central executive component of working memory. Schizophrenia Research, 68, 173–187.
Kopelman, M. D. (1986). The cholinergic neurotransmitter system in human memory and dementia: A review. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 535–573.
Levy, A., Brandeis, R., Treves, T. A., Meshulam, Y., Vawassi, F., Feiler, D., et al. (1994). Transdermal physostigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 8, 15–21.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Mintzer, M. Z. (2003). Triazolam-induced amnesia and the word-frequency effect in recognition memory: Support for a dual process account. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 596–602.
Mintzer, M. Z., Frey, J. M., Yingling, J. E., & Griffiths, R. R. (1997). Triazolam and zolpidem: A comparison of their psychomotor, cognitive, and subjective effects in healthy volunteers. Behavioural Pharmacology, 8, 561–574.
Mintzer, M. Z., & Griffiths, R. R. (2001a). Acute dose-effects of scopolamine on false recognition. Psychopharmacology, 153, 425–433.
Mintzer, M. Z., & Griffiths, R. R. (2001b). False recognition in triazolam-induced amnesia. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 475–492.
Mintzer, M. Z., & Griffiths, R. R. (2003). Lorazepam and scopolamine: A single-dose comparison of effects on human memory and attentional processes. Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 56–72.
Mohler, H., & Okada, T. (1977). Benzodiazepine receptor: Demonstration in the central nervous system. Science, 198, 849–851.
Müller, U., Mottweiler, E., & Bublak, P. (2005). Noradrenergic blockade and numeric working memory in humans. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 19, 21–28.
Müller, U., Steffenhagen, N., Regenthal, R., & Bublak, P. (2004). Effects of modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology, 177, 161–169.
Petrides, M. (1994). Frontal lobes and behavior. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 207–211.
Polster, M. R. (1993). Drug-induced amnesia: Implications for cognitive neuropsychological investigations of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 477–493.
Postle, B. R., Berger, J. S., & D’Esposito, M. (1999). Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Psychology, 96, 12959–12964.
Reder, L. M., Oates, J. M., Thornton, E. R., Quinlan, J. J., Kaufer, A., & Sauer, J. (2006). Drug-induced amnesia hurts recognition, but only for memories that can be unitized. Psychological Science, 17, 562–567.
Robbins, T. W., Semple, J., Kumar, R., Truman, M. I., Shorter, J., Ferraro, A., et al. (1997). Effects of scopolamine on delayedmatching-to-sample and paired associate’s tests of visual memory and learning in human subjects: Comparison with diazepam and implications for dementia. Psychopharmacology, 134, 95–106.
Rusted, J. M. (1988). Dissociative effects of scopolamine on working memory in healthy young volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 96, 487–492.
Rusted, J. M., Eaton-Williams, P., & Warburton, D. M. (1991). A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and diazepam on working memory. Psychopharmacology, 105, 442–445.
Rusted, J. M., & Warburton, D. M. (1988). The effects of scopolamine on working memory in healthy young volunteers. Psychopharmacology, 96, 145–152.
Sano, M., Bell, K., Marder, K., Stricks, L., Stern, Y., & Mayeux, R. (1993). Safety and efficacy of oral physostigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer disease. Clinical Neuropharmacology, 16, 61–69.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 12061–12068.
Squires, R. F., & Braestrup, C. (1977). Benzodiazepine receptors in rat brain. Nature, 266, 732–734.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Terry, A. V., Jr., Jackson, W. J., & Buccafusco, J. J. (1993). Effects of concomitant cholinergic and adrenergic stimulation on learning and memory performance by young and aged monkeys. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 304–312.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Wesnes, K., Simpson, P., & Kidd, A. (1988). An investigation of the range of cognitive impairments induced by scopolamine 0.6 mg s.c. Human Psychopharmacology, 3, 27–41.
White, A. M., Simson, P. E., & Best, P. J. (1997). Comparison between the effects of ethanol and diazepam on spatial working memory in the rat. Psychopharmacology, 133, 256–261.
Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Scientific Research, 2, 149–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This project was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Grants DA-03889 and DA-11936.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mintzer, M.Z., Griffiths, R.R. Differential effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on working memory maintenance versus manipulation processes. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 7, 120–129 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.2.120
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.2.120