Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
JPN
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
JPN

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow JPN on Twitter
Letters

Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models

Martin Alda and Flavio Kapczinski
J Psychiatry Neurosci November 01, 2016 41 (6) E84-E85; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.160197
Martin Alda
From the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (Alda); and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada (Kapczinski)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Flavio Kapczinski
From the Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada (Alda); and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada (Kapczinski)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We are thankful to Drs. Shah and Scott for their comments on our editorial. Their letter gives us an opportunity to expand on and clarify the most relevant points. Our main argument has been that the staging model may not be as fully developed as to be ready for clinical application, but it has had healthy stimulating effect on our field, and we see the letter by Shah and Scott as a testimony to that.

It was not our intention to focus just on stages in fully manifest illness. The importance of recognizing clinical heterogeneity of bipolar disorder is supported by studies of prodromal stages as well. We have been involved in some of the longitudinal high-risk studies of young people at risk for bipolar disorder.1–3 These studies, among others, described early stages of the illness and their comorbidities4 as well as neuropsychological functioning5 and structural brain findings.6 Based on these studies as well as on observations of other authors, we believe that the point of heterogeneity of bipolar disorder and the need to separate it from the concept of uniformly progressing illness are equally applicable in the early stages as in the latter ones. The prodromes may appear non-specific and uninformative with respect to future illness trajectories when viewed through the prism of current diagnostic classification. But an alternate phenotypic characterization may identify well circumscribed and more homogeneous subgroups of illness that are continuous with the later stages. This is exemplified by the studies of children of lithium-responsive and nonresponsive parents, showing concordance of the patterns of clinical course (as well as treatment response) between generations.4,7

Another point raised by Shah and Scott pertains to the risk:benefit ratio of treatments in different stages, considered more favourable early on. We agree that this is a reasonable assumption, but it remains to be tested, and such testing may not be easy to carry out. A recent review lists a handful of studies, some showing short-term relief of clinical symptoms in young people (frequently treated with medication).8 However, the lower risk:benefit ratio of these mostly psychosocial treatments is implicitly assumed rather than derived from appropriate comparisons.

We agree with Drs. Shah and Scott that more attention needs to be paid to the early stages of major psychiatric disorders. We also believe that the staging concept is important for psychiatry heuristically as it challenges some of the basic concepts of bipolar disorder. However, before it can be applied clinically, the staging model deserves deeper scrutiny and more support from longitudinal studies.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Duffy A,
    2. Alda M,
    3. Kutcher S,
    4. et al
    .Psychiatric symptoms and syndromes among adolescent children of parents with lithium-responsive or lithium-nonresponsive bipolar disorder.Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:431–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Duffy A,
    2. Alda M,
    3. Hajek T,
    4. et al
    .Early stages in the development of bipolar disorder.J Affect Disord 2010;121:127–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Uher R,
    2. Cumby J,
    3. MacKenzie LE,
    4. et al
    .A familial risk enriched cohort as a platform for testing early interventions to prevent severe mental illness.BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:344
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Duffy A,
    2. Alda M,
    3. Kutcher S,
    4. et al
    .A prospective study of the offspring of bipolar parents responsive and non-responsive to lithium treatment.J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:1171–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. MacQueen GM,
    2. Grof P,
    3. Alda M,
    4. et al
    .A pilot study of visual backward masking performance among affected versus unaffected offspring of parents with bipolar disorder.Bipolar Disord 2004;6:374–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Hajek T,
    2. Cullis J,
    3. Novak T,
    4. et al
    .Brain structural signature of familial predisposition for bipolar disorder: replicable evidence for involvement of the right inferior frontal gyrus.Biol Psychiatry 2013;73:144–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Duffy A,
    2. Alda M,
    3. Milin R,
    4. et al
    .A consecutive series of treated affected offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: Is response associated with the clinical profile?.Can J Psychiatry 2007;52:369–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Vallarino M,
    2. Henry C,
    3. Etain B,
    4. et al
    .An evidence map of psychosocial interventions for the earliest stages of bipolar disorder.Lancet Psychiatry 2015;2:548–63.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience: 41 (6)
J Psychiatry Neurosci
Vol. 41, Issue 6
1 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JPN.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JPN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JPN web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models
Martin Alda, Flavio Kapczinski
J Psychiatry Neurosci Nov 2016, 41 (6) E84-E85; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160197

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models
Martin Alda, Flavio Kapczinski
J Psychiatry Neurosci Nov 2016, 41 (6) E84-E85; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160197
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • Concepts and misconceptions regarding clinical staging models
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1180-4882.

All editorial matter in JPN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.
To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].
View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire