Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
JPN
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
JPN

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Issues
    • Issue in progress
    • Issues by date
  • Sections
    • Editorial
    • Review
    • Research
    • Commentary
    • Psychopharmacology for the Clinician
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Topic Collections
  • Instructions for Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission checklist
    • Editorial policies
    • Publication fees
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Dr. Francis Wayne Quan Memorial Prize
    • Open access
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • About
    • General information
    • Staff
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact
  • Subscribe to our alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow JPN on Twitter
Research Paper

Altered intrinsic functional brain architecture in female patients with bulimia nervosa

Li Wang, Qing-Mei Kong, Ke Li, Xue-Ni Li, Ya-Wei Zeng, Chao Chen, Ying Qian, Shi-Jie Feng, Ji-Tao Li, Yun’Ai Su, Christoph U. Correll, Philip B. Mitchell, Chao-Gan Yan, Da-Rong Zhang and Tian-Mei Si
J Psychiatry Neurosci November 01, 2017 42 (6) 414-423; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.160183
Li Wang
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qing-Mei Kong
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ke Li
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xue-Ni Li
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ya-Wei Zeng
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao Chen
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Qian
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shi-Jie Feng
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji-Tao Li
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yun’Ai Su
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph U. Correll
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip B. Mitchell
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chao-Gan Yan
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Da-Rong Zhang
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tian-Mei Si
From Peking University Sixth Hospital, Institute of Mental Health, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the National Clinical Research Center for Mental Health Disorders & Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Peking University, Beijing, China (Wang, Kong, Li Xue-Ni, Chen, Qian, Li Ji-Tao, Su, Zhang, Si); the Department of Radiology, 306 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Beijing, China (Li Ke, Zeng); the Shanxi Mental Health Center, Shanxi, China (Feng); the Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, North Shore — Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY (Correll); the Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (Correll); the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY (Correll); the School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales and Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia (Mitchell); the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China (Yan); the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (Yan); and the Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (Yan).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Bulimia nervosa is a severe psychiatric syndrome with uncertain pathogenesis. Neural systems involved in sensorimotor and visual processing, reward and impulsive control may contribute to the binge eating and purging behaviours characterizing bulimia nervosa. However, little is known about the alterations of functional organization of whole brain networks in individuals with this disorder.

Methods: We used resting-state functional MRI and graph theory to characterize functional brain networks of unmedicated women with bulimia nervosa and healthy women.

Results: We included 44 unmedicated women with bulimia nervosa and 44 healthy women in our analyses. Women with bulimia nervosa showed increased clustering coefficient and path length compared with control women. The nodal strength in patients with the disorder was higher in the sensorimotor and visual regions as well as the precuneus, but lower in several subcortical regions, such as the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus and orbitofrontal cortex. Patients also showed hyperconnectivity primarily involving sensorimotor and unimodal visual association regions, but hypoconnectivity involving subcortical (striatum, thalamus), limbic (amygdala, hippocampus) and paralimbic (orbitofrontal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus) regions. The topological aberrations correlated significantly with scores of bulimia and drive for thinness and with body mass index.

Limitations: We reruited patients with only acute bulimia nervosa, so it is unclear whether the topological abnormalities comprise vulnerability markers for the disorder developing or the changes associated with illness state.

Conclusion: Our findings show altered intrinsic functional brain architecture, specifically abnormal global and local efficiency, as well as nodal- and network-level connectivity across sensorimotor, visual, subcortical and limbic systems in women with bulimia nervosa, suggesting that it is a disorder of dysfunctional integration among large-scale distributed brain regions. These abnormalities contribute to more comprehensive understanding of the neural mechanism underlying pathological eating and body perception in women with bulimia nervosa.

Introduction

Bulimia nervosa is a severe psychiatric syndrome that usually begins during adolescence in girls. It is characterized by episodic binge eating followed by purging behaviours to avoid weight gain. The disorder was thought to be the product of a variety of sociocultural, psychological and biological factors;1 however, its neurobiological underpinnings remain largely unknown, hindering the development of new evidence-based treatments.

Neuroimaging techniques, especially functional MRI (fMRI), provide powerful tools to explore the pathophysiology of bulimia nervosa. Researchers have mainly used task-based paradigms, such as stimuli related to food/state, body and impulsive control, to elicit the neural processes associated with bulimia nervosa. The neural profile observed in patients with bulimia nervosa appears to be subserved by dysfunctions of a variety of cortical and subcortical regions.

Specifically, reported abnormalities primarily pointed to the ventral limbic and paralimbic systems, particularly for the ventral striatum, amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), which are important for reward and emotional processing and interoception;2–8 the occipital cortex, which mediates visual perception and processing;9–11 the dorsal and medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), which subserve impulsive inhibition function;12,13 and the somatosensory regions.8 Dysfunction in these regions has been proposed to comprise key neural mechanisms underlying altered reward and emotional sensitivity,2,4–7 interoceptive deficits3 and self-regulatory difficulties,12,13 especially in response to eating- and body-related stimuli. These multidimensional pathological features collectively induce the body image distortion and binge eating and purging behaviours characteristic of bulimia nervosa. A few studies have highlighted an involvement of abnormal intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) of the somatosensory network,14 ACC and precuneus15 in the disturbances of body image processing of bulimia nervosa.

Despite increased knowledge of neuroimaging patterns, little is known regarding possible disruptions of the topological organization of whole-brain functional networks in bulimia nervosa. The brain is composed of complex biological systems that integrate signals from multiple regions to facilitate effective information processing.16,17 Graph theory provides a powerful means of quantitatively describing the topological organization of brain connectivity. A number of topological properties, including small-worldness, network hubs and modularity, have been characterized in the human brain.17 These network properties are disrupted under pathological conditions, such as schizophrenia,18 depression19 and anorexia nervosa.20 Although a few studies14,15 have used resting-state fMRI to map the brain connectivity in patients with bulimia nervosa, they all adopted a seed-based analysis strategy examining connectivity between predefined regions — a potentially biased approach lacking a global brain perspective. Because bulimia nervosa involves disturbances of a broad range of neural processes from basic sensory and visual processing to higher-level cognition functions,21 it is likely that this disorder affects information exchange across large-scale brain networks. A network-based statistics (NBS) analysis22 that incorporates multiple brain networks could facilitate the examination of neurobiological alteration in a broader context, which may contribute to a better understanding of the behavioural complexity of bulimia nervosa.

With these knowledge gaps in mind, the present study was undertaken to determine if patients with bulimia nervosa would show disrupted topological organization of functional brain networks. Specifically, we collected resting-state fMRI data from patients with bulimia nervosa and healthy controls and systematically analyzed their topological properties and network interactions using graph theory and NBS. We hypothesized that patients with bulimia nervosa would show abnormal topological properties in functional brain networks and that the functional disturbances would be apparent in the cortical and subcortical regions involved in reward and emotional processing, sensorimotor and visual perception, and interoception, based on potential relevance of these neural functions to bulimia nervosa.2–15 We also examined the behavioural/symptom correlates of these network properties.

Methods

Participants

We recruited women with bulimia nervosa and healthy control women. Those with bulimia nervosa were recruited from the outpatient and inpatient services of Peking University Sixth Hospital. Controls were recruited via local advertisements. The diagnosis of bulimia nervosa was made according to DSM-IV criteria. Patients were required to be 16–30 years old, to currently have both binge eating and compensatory behaviours and to have been free of any psychotropic medications for at least 1 month before the study. We excluded those with current comorbid psychiatric disorders according to DSM-IV criteria, including depressive disorder and anxiety, in order to avoid potential confounding effects on the results. Healthy controls were required to have a body mass index (BMI) of 17.5–25 kg/m2, normal menstrual cycles and no lifetime history of any psychiatric disorder. We conducted a face-to-face interview for each healthy control participant using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) to exclude those with any psychiatric disorder.23

All participants completed the Eating Disorder Inventory-1 (EDI-1) questionnaire, the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) on the day of scanning. The EDI-1 is a 64-item self-report questionnaire of psychological traits that are clinically relevant in individuals with eating disorders.24 Participants respond on a 6-point Likert scale (with responses ranging from “always” to “never”). This study reports the scores of EDI-1 subscales of drive for thinness, bulimia, body dissatisfaction and interoceptive deficits. The Institutional Review Board of Peking University Sixth Hospital approved this study, and all participants provided written informed consent.

MRI acquisition

Images were acquired using a Siemens 3 T scanner. The resting-state functional images were obtained using an echo- planar imaging sequence with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) 2000 ms, echo time (TE) 30 ms, flip angle 90°, 64 × 64 matrix, slice thickness 4.0 mm, gap 0.8 mm, 30 slices, duration 7 minutes. In addition, we obtained T1-weighted images using a magnetization-prepared rapidly acquired gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence under the following parameters: TR 2300 ms, TE 3.01 ms, 256 × 256 matrix, flip angle 9°. We asked the participants to keep their eyes closed without falling asleep and to move as little as possible. Through confirmation after scanning, no participants reported discomfort or falling asleep during scanning, and no participants showed obvious structural damage based on conventional MRI scans.

Data preprocessing

The resting state fMRI images were preprocessed using Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF; http://rfmri.org/DPARSF), which is based on Statistical Parametric Mapping version 12 (SPM12; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm). After removing the first 10 volumes, we corrected the remaining 200 volumes for different signal acquisition times. The functional volumes were motion-corrected using a 6-parameter rigid-body transformation. Then, the nuisance signals (including Friston 24-parameter model25,26 of head-motion parameters, cerebrospinal fluid signal, white matter signal and linear trend) were regressed out. Derived images were normalized to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space (3 mm3 isotropic) using the Diffeomorphic Anatomic Registration with the Exponentiated Lie (DARTEL) algebra tool. Then, the transformed images were band-pass filtered (0.01–0.1 Hz).

Given a possible confounding effect of micromovements on iFC,27 we calculated the framewise displacement (FD) values for each participant using the Jenkinson fomula,28 which could reflect the temporal derivative of the movement parameters.26

Network construction

The connectome graph is composed of distinct brain regions (nodes) and their functional interactions (edges). The whole brain was first parcellated into 90 cortical and subcortical regions of interest (45 for each hemisphere; Appendix 1, Table S1, available at jpn.ca/160183-a1), as defined by the automated anatomic labelling (AAL) atlas.29 The mean time series of each region was extracted by averaging the time series of all voxels within that region. We estimated Pearson correlation coefficients for each pair of regions, and they were transformed to Fisher z-scores to create the connectivity matrix for each participant. The correlation matrices were further thresholded into binary networks by applying a density threshold (the number of edges divided by the maximum possible number of edges; also called “sparsity threshold” in some studies) to normalize the number of edges among the graphs. Applying a 10% threshold to a correlation matrix means assigning the top 400 edges (10% of the maximum 4005 edges) to 1 and assigning the remaining edges to 0.

Network analysis

Based on the constructed brain networks, we examined both the global and regional topological properties of brain graphs. At the global level, we examined the small-world parameters involving the clustering coefficient (Cp), characteristic path length (Lp), and their normalized versions using a random network (γ, λ). At the regional level, we examined the degree centrality and efficiency for each node. A wide range of density thresholds (10% ≤ density ≤ 34%, step of 1%) was chosen to allow prominent small-world properties in brain networks to be observed, similar to a previous study.19 For each metric, the area under the curve (AUC) for this density range was calculated as representative to avoid the results being dependent on a few densities. See Appendix 1, Table S2, and the study by Rubinov and Sporns30 for the definitions and interpretations of these network measures.

Statistical analysis

Between-group differences

To determine whether there are significant group differences in the network properties, we performed 2-sample t tests on AUC values of each network metric (small-world parameters and regional centrality measures), with age, education and mean values of FD as covariates. We used MATLAB’s Lilliefors test (i.e., lillietest) to determine if the measures were normally distributed and found none of them rejected the null hypothesis (normally distributed) at the 5% significance level. Thus, using a t test is appropriate in such a condition. We identified the brain regions showing significant between-group differences in at least 1 nodal metric (node degree or efficiency; p < 0.05, uncorrected, as an exploratory analysis). Further, we used NBS to localize specific pairs of brain regions in which iFC was altered in patients with bulimia nervosa. To facilitate data interpretation, we sorted connections based on functional hierarchy31 (i.e., primary sensorimotor, unimodal, heteromodal, paralimbic, limbic and subcortical).

Associations between network measures and clinical variables

The partial correlation analysis was performed between the network measures showing between-group differences and clinical variables, including current BMI, illness duration, HAMD and HAM-A scores, and EDI-1 scores for body dissatisfaction, bulimia, drive for thinness and interoceptive awareness, in patients with bulimia nervosa, using age, education and mean FD as covariates.

Validation: reproducibility

We addressed possible concerns regarding the generalizability of our findings to other studies by varying several factors:1 network types, head-motion scrubbing and brain parcellation approach. First, we implemented weighted-network analyses to assess the stability of our findings across different network types.2 In regards to head-motion scrubbing, in the main analysis, we added motion parameters from the Friston 24-parameter model into regression at the individual level and mean FD as a covariate in group analysis to control for head motion. To assess whether residual motion biased group differences, we reprocessed data with individual-level head motion scrubbing instead of group-level motion covariation. “Bad” time points were identified using a threshold of FD > 0.2 mm as well as 1 back and 2 forward neighbours, as performed previously.32 Then each “bad” time point was modelled as a separate regressor in the nuisance covariate regression models. Topological properties and network connectivity were compared based on the scrubbed data; we excluded 6 patients and 9 controls from this validation analysis because more than 50% of the time points were scrubbed.3 For the brain parcellation approach, we redefined nodes using a high-resolution atlas33 with 1024 nodes to examine the reproducibility of our results across different parcellation strategies. We mainly examined the reproducibility of the results of small-world parameters and nodal strength measures.4 We also tested our results using nonparametric permutation tests. Briefly, we calculated the between-group difference in the mean value of each network metric. For each network metric, we then randomly reallocated all the values into 2 groups and recomputed the mean differences between the 2 randomized groups. This randomization procedure was repeated 10 000 times, and the 95th percentile points of each distribution were used as the critical values for a 1-tailed test of the null hypothesis with a probability of type I error of 0.05. Multiple regression analyses were applied to remove the confounding effects of age, education and mean values of FD for each network metric.

Results

Participant characteristics

We recruited 48 women with bulimia nervosa (mean age 22.0 ± 3.4 yr) and 45 healthy control women (mean age 23.1 ± 3.4 yr). Of those recruited, 4 patients and 1 control participant had a mean FD > 0.2 mm, translation > 2 mm, or rotation > 2° and were excluded, leaving data from 44 patients and 44 controls for further analysis. There were no significant differences in age, years of education, or current BMI between patients with bulimia nervosa and healthy controls; however, those with bulimia nervosa showed significantly higher scores than controls on the EDI-1, HAMD-17 and HAM-A (Table 1). Among the 44 women with bulimia nervosa, 17 had a history of anorexia nervosa.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Demographic data in patients with bulimia nervosa and healthy controls

Small-world properties

For the AUC across density range of 10% to about 34%, we found significantly increased local clustering (indexed by Cp) in patients with bulimia nervosa compared with healthy controls, which was contributed mostly by higher densities (20% to about 34%; Fig. 1A), whereas the difference in local clustering was not significant after the Cp was normalized by matched random networks (indexed by γ; Fig. 1B). For shortest path length, patients with bulimia nervosa showed a trend of increased Lp, mostly contributed by lower densities (12% to about 24%; Fig. 1C). Interestingly, after being normalized by matched random networks, the increase in path length (indexed by λ) became significant (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1

Between-group differences in small-world properties of functional brain networks across a wide range of density thresholds. The inserts represent the differences of the area under curve (AUC) for each topological parameter across the density range of 10% to about 34%. Error bars denote standard deviations. Black asterisks indicate where the differences between groups are significant at a given density threshold (t test, p < 0.05). A) Clustering coefficient (Cp); B) normalized clustering coefficient, γ; C) shortest path length (Lp); D) normalized shortest path length, λ.

Nodal characteristics

Compared with the healthy controls, patients with bulimia nervosa showed increased nodal strength in the primary sensorimotor (left precentral gyrus, right postcentral gyrus) and unimodal visual association (bilateral superior occipital cortex, bilateral middle occipital cortex, left cuneus, bilateral lingual gyrus and right inferior temporal gyrus) regions, as well as the right precuneus, but decreased nodal strength in the medial orbital frontal gyrus (right middle OFC, left olfactory cortex), medial temporal lobe (left hippocampus, bilateral parahippocampal gyrus [PHG]) and several subcortical regions (left insula, left amygdala, left putamen and left thalamus; Fig. 2 and Appendix 1, Table S3).

Fig. 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2

Between-group differences in nodal strength (nodal degree or efficiency) and their associations with clinical variables in patients with bulimia nervosa. A) The medium grey areas indicate increased nodal strength in patients with bulimia nervosa compared with healthy controls, and the darker grey areas represent the opposite. B) Scatter plots of nodal metrics against clinical variables.

Network connectivity

The NBS analysis identified a significantly altered network comprising seemingly disparate themes of both hyper- and hypoconnectivity in women with bulimia nervosa. Analyses sorting abnormal iFC based on functional hierarchy31 showed that the hyperconnectivity extended across the functional divisions of the primary sensorimotor, unimodal association and heteromodal association systems, with primary sensorimotor and unimodal visual association regions having the highest proportions of affected connections (Fig. 3 and Appendix 1, Table S4), whereas the hypoconnectivity was associated with subcortical (caudate, putamen, thalamus), limbic (amygdala, hippocampus) and paralimbic (OFC, ACC, PHG) system regions, particularly for connectivity between subcortical regions and sensorimotor and unimodal visual association regions (Fig. 3 and Appendix 1, Table S5).

Fig. 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3

Between-group differences in whole-brain functional connectivity. A) Both hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity in patients with bulimia nervosa (BN) compared with healthy controls (HC). The size of the spheres indicates the number of increased or decreased connectivities with a node. B) The table summarizes the absolute number and percentage of intrinsic functional connectivity within and between functional divisions showing significant differences between patients and controls. White cells represent the absence of significant intrinsic functional connectivity. Hyper cells represent hyperconnectivity (bulimia nervosa > healthy control), whereas Hypo cells represent bulimia nervosa–related hypoconnectivity (bulimia nervosa < healthy control). Shading decreases proportionally from the highest percentage (21%) to the lowest (0%). SM = sensorimotor.

Clinical associations

There were no significant correlations between small-world measures and clinical variables. For the nodes showing altered degree or efficiency, we found significant positive correlations between nodal strength of several occipital and temporal lobe regions and bulimia (Fig. 2B). The significant positive correlation was also detected between nodal strength of the bilateral lingual gyrus and drive for thinness, but we can see from Figure 2 that the correlations might be driven by an outlier, which may indicate that the inference of clinical significance of this finding in the following discussion should be taken cautiously. The iFC in a number of the connectivity pairs between the subcortical (thalamus, putamen, caudate) and paralimbic (ACC) regions and sensorimotor and unimodal visual regions showed significant negative correlations with bulimia and drive for thinness, whereas several connectivity pairs between the thalamus and unimodal visual regions were significantly positively correlated with BMI (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Significant correlations observed between the intrinsic functional connectivity aberrations and clinical variables in women with bulimia nervosa

Reproducibility of the findings

For the measures of small-world properties, the results of increased clustering and path length could also be observed after scrubbing and accounting for the effects of parcellation strategies. Specifically, patients with bulimia nervosa showed significant increases in the AUC of both Cp and λ with head-motion scrubbing as well as significant increases in the AUC of λ and an increased trend in Cp with the 1024-nodes atlas (Appendix 1, Fig. S1). Notably, we observed an increased trend in λ, but no significant group differences in clustering measures during the analysis with weighted networks (Appendix 1, Fig. S1). However, we thought that the results of binary networks in the main analysis may be more reliable, given previous findings showing a trend of greater reliability of the binary node definition of a network compared with its weighted node definition.34,35 The results of group differences of the small-world properties could also be repeated after nonparametric permutation tests (Cp: p = 0.005; γ: p = 0.61; Lp: p = 0.07; γ: p = 0.023).

For the measures of nodal degree or efficiency, most of the results were preserved after scrubbing and accounting for the effects of parcellation strategies and network types (Appendix 1, Fig. S2A–C). Of note, we found nodal abnormalities in broader regions with the 1024-nodes atlas (Appendix 1, Fig. S2C). A possible reason may be that the topological organizations are largely dependent on spatial parcellation strategies; analysis with high-resolution templates could provide more detailed information about the network changes.36 The results of group differences of nodal degree or efficiency after nonparametric permutation tests were very similar to those obtained with 2-sample t tests (Appendix 1, Table S4).

Discussion

The present study examined the topological organization of whole brain networks in women with bulimia nervosa. Basically consistent with the previous hypothesis, we found altered topological properties and networks in women with the disorder, mainly including increased clustering and path length; higher nodal strength in sensorimotor and visual regions and the precuneus, but lower nodal strength in several subcortical regions (insula, amygdala, putamen, thalamus), hippocampus, PHG and OFC; and both hyper- and hypoconnectivity, with the hyperconnectivity primarily involving sensorimotor and unimodal visual association regions and the hypoconnectivity being associated with subcortical, limbic and paralimbic system regions, particularly for connectivity between subcortical regions and sensorimotor and unimodal visual regions.

The human brain is a complex network with some fundamental organizational principles;17 among them, the small-worldness is a very important attribute.17 According to 2 basic properties, the clustering coefficient and path length, a network can be classified into regular, random and small-world networks.17 Regular networks are characterized by high clustering and long path length, indicating good local but poor global efficiency,37 whereas random networks have low clustering and short path length, indicating the opposite situation.37 A small-world network possesses a combination of high clustering and short path length. This economical yet efficient communication architecture is crucial for normal brain functions,38 such as cognitive abilities.38 We found increased clustering and path length in women with bulimia nervosa, suggesting increased local but decreased global efficiency and a shift toward regular network, which has been characterized in several other psychiatric diseases.39,40 Although the exact mechanism remains unclear, the regularized process has been associated with reduced signal transmission speed and coordination,41 which may be compensated by higher local efficiency to preserve efficient communication.42

Further analysis of regional and network measures revealed both increased and decreased patterns of nodal strength and iFC in women with bulimia nervosa. The increased nodal strength and iFC primarily involved sensorimotor and unimodal visual (mainly in the occipital cortex) regions. The sensorimotor cortex provides an obligatory portal for the entry of sensory information into the cortical circuitry and is important for awareness of body sensations, size and spatial positions,31 whereas the occipital cortex mediates visual perception of body shape and/or size.43 The sensorimotor and occipital regions are thus potentially relevant to the behavioural manifestation of distorted body image (i.e., overestimation of body size, body dissatisfaction and body weight control), which has an important role in the onset and maintenance of eating disorders44 and seems to be more pronounced in patients with bulimia nervosa than in those who have anorexia nervosa.45

The relevance of the sensorimotor and occipital regions to distorted body image has been emphasized in several previous studies.9–11,14 For instance, reduced occipitotemporal responses during presentations of underweight or overweight human bodies were observed in patients with bulimia nervosa;9 the lateral occipital activation was sensitive to stimuli of body size distortions in healthy people, whereas such a modulation was not observed in those with bulimia nervosa.10 At rest, patients with bulimia nervosa showed abnormal iFC within the somatosensory network and between the paracentral lobule and 2 occipital regions.14 In the present study, we provide evidence for bulimia nervosa–related dysfunctions in the sensorimotor and visual regions within a larger whole brain context. The strengthened coupling between sensorimotor and occipital regions may reflect a dysfunctional processing of sensorimotor information about perceived body size; such an anomalous multisensory integration might be also explained by the inclination of patients with bulimia nervosa to use somatosensory means to check and hide their body size (e.g., repeated weighing, wearing bulky clothes, etc.). The clinical implication of our findings is further strengthened by significant positive correlations observed between nodal strength in several unimodal visual regions and scores of bulimia and drive for thinness.

We also found increased nodal strength in the left precuneus and increased iFC between the precuneus and several sensorimotor and unimodal association regions. The precuneus, a core component within the default mode network, is involved in self-oriented processes,46 such as describing one’s physical appearance and personality trait.47 Preliminary evidence has indicated aberrant precuneus iFC with the somatosensory regions14 and dorsal ACC.15 We therefore speculate that altered precuneus connectivity may be a candidate mechanism for the core features of bulimia nervosa (i.e., overestimation of the importance of their bodily appearance instead of other aspects of performance and personality).48

Conversely, we found bulimia nervosa–related decreases in nodal strength in the OFC, medial temporal lobe (hippocampus and PHG) and subcortical regions (insula, amygdala, putamen and thalamus) and in iFC extending across subcortical (striatum, thalamus), limbic (amygdala, hippocampus) and paralimbic (ACC, PHG and OFC) systems, particularly for connectivity between subcortical regions and sensorimotor and unimodal visual regions. The striatum, thalamus, ACC, OFC, amygdala and hippocampus are associated with reward function,49 which has been disturbed in individuals with eating disorders.50 As reported previously, patients with bulimia nervosa showed reduced neural responses to a task paradigm generating reward values across a large network covering the insula, striatum, amygdala and OFC;2 such a response was predicted by binge/purge frequency.2 The abnormal response to food versus nonfood images in reward regions has been shown to differentiate anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.8 Based on these studies, our findings of decreased nodal strength in these reward-related regions and their iFC with sensorimotor and visual regions might indicate a reward hyposensitivity to disorder-specific signals, such as taste and bodily stimuli, in patients with bulimia nervosa. The downregulated reward system may drive the individuals to binge eating to compensate, followed by purging behaviours to prevent weight gain. Such a behavioural explanation could be further confirmed by our findings of significant negative correlations in iFC between several subcortical regions and sensorimotor and visual regions with bulimia scores of the EDI-1.

Given that the reward function involves a series of neural processes, it is of interest to speculate on more specific behavioural implications of our findings. The amygdala, striatum and OFC have been thought to mediate response to a reinforcing stimulus, reward learning and evaluation, respectively,51 whereas the ACC and PFC are responsible for reward-related decision-making.52 Preliminary evidence has implicated these regions in bulimia nervosa–related dysfunction in several reward-related behavioural domains. Specifically, patients with bulimia nervosa showed exaggerated response to food stimuli in the striatum and OFC5 and reduced amygdala response to disgusted facial expressions.4 Altered activity in the ACC and OFC has been observed in patients with bulimia nervosa during impulse-control tasks, which has been associated with self-regulatory deficits12,13 (i.e., an inability to inhibit impulses in favour of a delayed reward). Although it plays an important role in the processing of interoception-reward signals,53 disturbed insula response to sucrose taste has been implicated in interoceptive deficits (i.e., reduced ability to feel full or hungry) in individuals with bulimia nervosa.3,53 It could be speculated that patients with bulimia nervosa may be impaired in a series of reward-related processes, which contributes to an inability to accurately identify emotional significance, generate appropriate behaviours and make decisions concerning eating and bodily stimuli.22

Our findings also pointed to a less commonly considered region in patients with bulimia nervosa — the thalamus. The thalamus relays communication among subcortical and cortical regions and plays a central role in the integration of sensory information.54 A recent study has shown abnormal structural integrity in the thalamic radiation tract of patients with bulimia nervosa.55 Our study confirmed that the thalamus functional connectivity was also impaired, as reduced iFC between the thalamus and sensorimotor and unimodal visual regions and negative associations between the thalamus connectivity and BMI were found in patients with bulimia nervosa. The finding might suggest impaired transmission processes of sensory and visual signals. In addition, given the knowledge that the hippocampus and PHG are involved in visuospatial perception and contextual memory processes,56,57 we speculate that our findings of reduced nodal strength in the hippocampus and PHG and PHG–OFC connectivity may contribute to the coexisting impairment of visuospatial ability and visual memory in women with bulimia nervosa.58

Limitations

Strengths of our study include the large unmedicated sample of patients with acute bulimia nervosa who had a short duration of illness. However, several issues need to be further addressed. It is unclear whether the topological abnormalities comprise vulnerability markers for the disorder developing or whether they are the results of disorder-specific symptoms and behaviours. Studying patients after recovery will be necessary to disentangle these trait and state effects. Future studies might also examine the effects of cognitive behavioural or pharmacological therapies on neural processes in patients with bulimia nervosa. Such an intervention design may provide deeper insights into the neural mechanisms of the disorder and allow for the identification of predictors of treatment outcome. In addition, the disorder specificity of our findings remains to be clarified, given that the dysfunctions in some of the regions, such as the striatum, thalamus and OFC, have also been detected in patients with a range of other mental disorders.59–62 Finally, as this is, to our knowledge, the first study of topological organization of bulimia nervosa and as so far only a few resting-state fMRI studies have been conducted in patients with this disorder, the results and their interpretation are still tentative. A combined design of resting-state and task-based paradigms would be helpful for strengthening the understanding of the behavioural implications of our findings.

Conclusion

We found women with bulimia nervosa to have altered intrinsic functional brain architecture: specifically, altered global and local efficiency and nodal- and network-level connectivity involving the sensorimotor and visual, limbic, paralimbic and subcortical systems. These findings support the proposal that bulimia nervosa is a disorder of dysfunctional integration among large-scale, distributed brain regions/networks. The characteristic abnormalities may contribute to more comprehensive understanding of the behavioural complexities of bulimia nervosa and further help identify potential novel therapeutic targets for this disorder.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for funding from the National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAI13B01), Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (D121100005012002 and Z161100000216152), Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20130001110106), National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2013CB531305), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671774), and the Hundred Talents Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Competing interests: C. Correll is on the boards of Alkermes, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sunovion and Teva; a consultant for Alkermes, Allergan, the Gerson Lehrman Group, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, Medscape, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sunovion, Takeda and Teva; has been paid by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Otsuka for expert testimony; has received speaker fees from Alkermes, Allergan, the Gerson Lehrman Group, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, Medscape, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sunovion, Takeda and Teva; and has received payment from Medscape for manuscript preparation. No other competing interests declared.

  • Contributors: Q. Kong, K. Li, X. Li, D. Zhang and T. Si designed the study. L.Wang, Y. Zeng, C. Chen, Y. Qian, S. Feng, J. Li and Y. Su acquired the data, which C. Correll, P. Mitchell and C. Yan analyzed. L. Wang wrote the article, which all authors reviewed and approved for publication.

  • Received September 13, 2016.
  • Revision received November 7, 2016.
  • Revision received February 6, 2017.
  • Accepted March 8, 2017.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Culbert KM,
    2. Racine SE,
    3. Klump KL
    .Research review: what we have learned about the causes of eating disorders — a synthesis of socio-cultural, psychological, and biological research.J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015;56:1141–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Frank GK,
    2. Reynolds JR,
    3. Shott ME,
    4. et al
    .Altered temporal difference learning in bulimia nervosa.Biol Psychiatry 2011;70:728–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Oberndorfer TA,
    2. Frank GK,
    3. Simmons AN,
    4. et al
    .Altered insula response to sweet taste processing after recovery from anorexia and bulimia nervosa.Am J Psychiatry 2013;170:1143–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Ashworth F,
    2. Pringle A,
    3. Norbury R,
    4. et al
    .Neural response to angry and disgusted facial expressions in bulimia nervosa.Psychol Med 2011;41:2375–84.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Radeloff D,
    2. Willmann K,
    3. Otto L,
    4. et al
    .High-fat taste challenge reveals altered striatal response in women recovered from bulimia nervosa: a pilot study.World J Biol Psychiatry 2014;15:307–16.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wagner A,
    2. Aizenstein H,
    3. Venkatraman VK,
    4. et al
    .Altered striatal response to reward in bulimia nervosa after recovery.Int J Eat Disord 2010;43:289–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Miyake Y,
    2. Okamoto Y,
    3. Onoda K,
    4. et al
    .Neural processing of negative word stimuli concerning body image in patients with eating disorders: an fMRI study.Neuroimage 2010;50:1333–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Brooks SJ,
    2. O’Daly OG,
    3. Uher R,
    4. et al
    .Differential neural responses to food images in women with bulimia versus anorexia nervosa.PLoS One 2011;6:e22259
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Uher R,
    2. Murphy T,
    3. Friederich HC,
    4. et al
    .Functional neuroanatomy of body shape perception in healthy and eating-disordered women.Biol Psychiatry 2005;58:990–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Mohr HM,
    2. Roder C,
    3. Zimmermann J,
    4. et al
    .Body image distortions in bulimia nervosa: investigating body size overestimation and body size satisfaction by fMRI.Neuroimage 2011;56:1822–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Van den Eynde F,
    2. Giampietro V,
    3. Simmons A,
    4. et al
    .Brain responses to body image stimuli but not food are altered in women with bulimia nervosa.BMC Psychiatry 2013;13:302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lock J,
    2. Garrett A,
    3. Beenhakker J,
    4. et al
    .Aberrant brain activation during a response inhibition task in adolescent eating disorder subtypes.Am J Psychiatry 2011;168:55–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Marsh R,
    2. Steinglass JE,
    3. Gerber AJ,
    4. et al
    .Deficient activity in the neural systems that mediate self-regulatory control in bulimia nervosa.Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:51–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lavagnino L,
    2. Amianto F,
    3. D’Agata F,
    4. et al
    .Reduced resting-state functional connectivity of the somatosensory cortex predicts psychopathological symptoms in women with bulimia nervosa.Front Behav Neurosci 2014;8:270
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Lee S,
    2. Ran Kim K,
    3. Ku J,
    4. et al
    .Resting-state synchrony between anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus relates to body shape concern in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.Psychiatry Res 2014;221:43–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Sporns O
    .The human connectome: a complex network.Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011;1224:109–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Bullmore E,
    2. Sporns O
    .Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems.Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:186–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. van den Heuvel MP,
    2. Mandl RC,
    3. Stam CJ,
    4. et al
    .Aberrant frontal and temporal complex network structure in schizophrenia: a graph theoretical analysis.J Neurosci 2010;30:15915–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Zhang J,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Wu Q,
    4. et al
    .Disrupted brain connectivity networks in drug-naive, first-episode major depressive disorder.Biol Psychiatry 2011;70:334–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Geisler D,
    2. Borchardt V,
    3. Lord AR,
    4. et al
    .Abnormal functional global and local brain connectivity in female patients with anorexia nervosa.J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016;41:6–15.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Frank GK,
    2. Kaye WH
    .Current status of functional imaging in eating disorders.Int J Eat Disord 2012;45:723–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zalesky A,
    2. Fornito A,
    3. Bullmore ET
    .Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks.Neuroimage 2010;53:1197–207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Sheehan DV,
    2. Lecrubier Y,
    3. Sheehan KH,
    4. et al
    .The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:22–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Garner DM
    .Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.Int J Eat Disord 1983;2:15–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Williams S,
    3. Howard R,
    4. et al
    .Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series.Magn Reson Med 1996;35:346–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Yan CG,
    2. Cheung B,
    3. Kelly C,
    4. et al
    .A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics.Neuroimage 2013;76:183–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Power JD,
    2. Barnes KA,
    3. Snyder AZ,
    4. et al
    .Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion.Neuroimage 2012;59:2142–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Bannister P,
    3. Brady M,
    4. et al
    .Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.Neuroimage 2002;17:825–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tzourio-Mazoyer N,
    2. Landeau B,
    3. Papathanassiou D,
    4. et al
    .Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.Neuroimage 2002;15:273–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Rubinov M,
    2. Sporns O
    .Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations.Neuroimage 2010;52:1059–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Mesulam MM
    .From sensation to cognition.Brain 1998;121:1013–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Power JD,
    2. Barnes KA,
    3. Snyder AZ,
    4. et al
    .Steps toward optimizing motion artifact removal in functional connectivity MRI; a reply to Carp.Neuroimage 2013;76:439–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Zalesky A,
    2. Fornito A,
    3. Harding IH,
    4. et al
    .Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter?.Neuroimage 2010;50:970–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Braun U,
    2. Plichta MM,
    3. Esslinger C,
    4. et al
    .Test-retest reliability of resting-state connectivity network characteristics using fMRI and graph theoretical measures.Neuroimage 2012;59:1404–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Liao XH,
    2. Xia MR,
    3. Xu T,
    4. et al
    .Functional brain hubs and their test-retest reliability: a multiband resting-state functional MRI study.Neuroimage 2013;83:969–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Zang Y,
    4. et al
    .Parcellation-dependent small-world brain functional networks: a resting-state fMRI study.Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30:1511–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Watts DJ,
    2. Strogatz SH
    .Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks.Nature 1998;393:440–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. van den Heuvel MP,
    2. Stam CJ,
    3. Kahn RS,
    4. et al
    .Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance.J Neurosci 2009;29:7619–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Wang X,
    4. et al
    .Disrupted small-world brain networks in moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a resting-state FMRI study.PLoS One 2012;7:e33540
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Suo X,
    2. Lei D,
    3. Li K,
    4. et al
    .Disrupted brain network topology in pediatric posttraumatic stress disorder: a resting-state fMRI study.Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:3677–86.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Strogatz SH
    .Exploring complex networks.Nature 2001;410:268–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Caeyenberghs K,
    2. Leemans A,
    3. Heitger MH,
    4. et al
    .Graph analysis of functional brain networks for cognitive control of action in traumatic brain injury.Brain 2012;135:1293–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Favaro A,
    2. Santonastaso P,
    3. Manara R,
    4. et al
    .Disruption of visuospatial and somatosensory functional connectivity in anorexia nervosa.Biol Psychiatry 2012;72:864–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Killen JD,
    2. Taylor CB,
    3. Hayward C,
    4. et al
    .Weight concerns influence the development of eating disorders: a 4-year prospective study.J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:936–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Cash TF,
    2. Deagle EA
    .The nature and extent of body-image disturbances in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: a meta-analysis.Int J Eat Disord 1997;22:107–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Cavanna AE
    .The precuneus and consciousness.CNS Spectr 2007;12:545–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Kircher TT,
    2. Senior C,
    3. Phillips ML,
    4. et al
    .Towards a functional neuroanatomy of self processing: effects of faces and words.Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2000;10:133–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Treasure J,
    2. Claudino AM,
    3. Zucker N
    .Eating disorders.Lancet 2010;375:583–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. McClure SM,
    2. York MK,
    3. Montague PR
    .The neural substrates of reward processing in humans: the modern role of FMRI.Neuroscientist 2004;10:260–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Frank GK
    .Altered brain reward circuits in eating disorders: Chicken or egg?.Curr Psychiatry Rep 2013;15:396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Elliott R,
    2. Friston KJ,
    3. Dolan RJ
    .Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems.J Neurosci 2000;20:6159–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Gottfried JA,
    2. O’Doherty J,
    3. Dolan RJ
    .Encoding predictive reward value in human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.Science 2003;301:1104–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Klabunde M,
    2. Acheson DT,
    3. Boutelle KN,
    4. et al
    .Interoceptive sensitivity deficits in women recovered from bulimia nervosa.Eat Behav 2013;14:488–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Sherman SM
    .Thalamic relays and cortical functioning.Prog Brain Res 2005;149:107–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. He X,
    2. Stefan M,
    3. Terranova K,
    4. et al
    .Altered white matter microstructure in adolescents and adults with bulimia nervosa.Neuropsychopharmacology 2016;41:1841–8.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Muzzio IA,
    2. Levita L,
    3. Kulkarni J,
    4. et al
    .Attention enhances the retrieval and stability of visuospatial and olfactory representations in the dorsal hippocampus.PLoS Biol 2009;7:e1000140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Mallow J,
    2. Bernarding J,
    3. Luchtmann M,
    4. et al
    .Superior memorizers employ different neural networks for encoding and recall.Front Syst Neurosci 2015;9:128
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Weider S,
    2. Indredavik MS,
    3. Lydersen S,
    4. et al
    .Neuropsychological function in patients with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa.Int J Eat Disord 2015;48:397–405.
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. Anticevic A,
    2. Hu S,
    3. Zhang S,
    4. et al
    .Global resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis identifies frontal cortex, striatal, and cerebellar dysconnectivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Biol Psychiatry 2014;75:595–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Meng C,
    2. Brandl F,
    3. Tahmasian M,
    4. et al
    .Aberrant topology of striatum’s connectivity is associated with the number of episodes in depression.Brain 2014;137:598–609.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Anand A,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. et al
    .Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study.Biol Psychiatry 2005;57:1079–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Anticevic A,
    2. Haut K,
    3. Murray JD,
    4. et al
    .Association of thalamic dysconnectivity and conversion to psychosis in youth and young adults at elevated clinical risk.JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72:882–91.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience: 42 (6)
J Psychiatry Neurosci
Vol. 42, Issue 6
1 Nov 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on JPN.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Altered intrinsic functional brain architecture in female patients with bulimia nervosa
(Your Name) has sent you a message from JPN
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the JPN web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Altered intrinsic functional brain architecture in female patients with bulimia nervosa
Li Wang, Qing-Mei Kong, Ke Li, Xue-Ni Li, Ya-Wei Zeng, Chao Chen, Ying Qian, Shi-Jie Feng, Ji-Tao Li, Yun’Ai Su, Christoph U. Correll, Philip B. Mitchell, Chao-Gan Yan, Da-Rong Zhang, Tian-Mei Si
J Psychiatry Neurosci Nov 2017, 42 (6) 414-423; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160183

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Altered intrinsic functional brain architecture in female patients with bulimia nervosa
Li Wang, Qing-Mei Kong, Ke Li, Xue-Ni Li, Ya-Wei Zeng, Chao Chen, Ying Qian, Shi-Jie Feng, Ji-Tao Li, Yun’Ai Su, Christoph U. Correll, Philip B. Mitchell, Chao-Gan Yan, Da-Rong Zhang, Tian-Mei Si
J Psychiatry Neurosci Nov 2017, 42 (6) 414-423; DOI: 10.1503/jpn.160183
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Investigating resting brain perfusion abnormalities and target-engagement by intranasal oxytocin in women with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder and healthy controls
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Authors & Reviewers

  • Overview for Authors
  • Submit a manuscript
  • Manuscript Submission Checklist

About

  • General Information
  • Staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Reprints
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibility
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1180-4882.

All editorial matter in JPN represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.
To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected].
View CMA's Accessibility policy.

Powered by HighWire